Cargando…

A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation

In Vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated that there are detectable differences between inhaled corticosteroids commonly used to treat asthma. However, controversy still remains as to whether these differences translate into clinical benefits. This 12-week, international, randomized, doubleblind,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ringdal, N., Swinburn, P., Backman, R., Plaschke, P., Sips, A. P., Kjaersgaard, P., Bratten, G., Harris, T. A. J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2365805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18475734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0962935196000555
_version_ 1782154221565509632
author Ringdal, N.
Swinburn, P.
Backman, R.
Plaschke, P.
Sips, A. P.
Kjaersgaard, P.
Bratten, G.
Harris, T. A. J.
author_facet Ringdal, N.
Swinburn, P.
Backman, R.
Plaschke, P.
Sips, A. P.
Kjaersgaard, P.
Bratten, G.
Harris, T. A. J.
author_sort Ringdal, N.
collection PubMed
description In Vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated that there are detectable differences between inhaled corticosteroids commonly used to treat asthma. However, controversy still remains as to whether these differences translate into clinical benefits. This 12-week, international, randomized, doubleblind, parallel-group study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) 800 μg daily, administered as a powder via the Diskhaler(®), and budesonide (BUD) 1600 μg daily, administered using the Turbuhaler(®), in adult patients with moderate-tosevere asthma. A total of 518 patients participated in the study, 256 of whom received FP and 262 BUD. Assessment of mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the 12-week treatment period revealed a statistically significant difference in efficacy between FP 800 μg daily and BUD 1600 μg daily in favour of FP (p = 0.003), with an overall improvement of 20.9 l/min with FP compared with 12.4 l/min on BUD. Statistically significant differences in favour of FP were seen over the 12 weeks for mean evening PEF (p = 0.04), diurnal PEF variation (p = 0.03) and percentage predicted PEF (p = 0.003), as well as forced expiratory volume (p = 0.008), forced vital capacity (p = 0.02) and PEF (p = 0.005) measured at clinic visits. The median percentage of symptom-free nights increased over the 12-week study period in both treatment groups, with similar changes seen for the median percentage of days with symptom score < 2, rescue medication use and exacerbations of asthma. The incidence of adverse events was found to be comparable in the two treatment groups. The geometric mean ratios of serum cortisol levels were found to be 1.03 for FP, indicating no mean hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression from baseline, and 0.93 for BUD (p = 0.0002 compared with FP). In summary, FP 800 μg daily showed a greater efficacy/safety ratio in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma than BUD 1600 μg daily.
format Text
id pubmed-2365805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1996
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23658052008-05-12 A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation Ringdal, N. Swinburn, P. Backman, R. Plaschke, P. Sips, A. P. Kjaersgaard, P. Bratten, G. Harris, T. A. J. Mediators Inflamm Research Article In Vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated that there are detectable differences between inhaled corticosteroids commonly used to treat asthma. However, controversy still remains as to whether these differences translate into clinical benefits. This 12-week, international, randomized, doubleblind, parallel-group study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) 800 μg daily, administered as a powder via the Diskhaler(®), and budesonide (BUD) 1600 μg daily, administered using the Turbuhaler(®), in adult patients with moderate-tosevere asthma. A total of 518 patients participated in the study, 256 of whom received FP and 262 BUD. Assessment of mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the 12-week treatment period revealed a statistically significant difference in efficacy between FP 800 μg daily and BUD 1600 μg daily in favour of FP (p = 0.003), with an overall improvement of 20.9 l/min with FP compared with 12.4 l/min on BUD. Statistically significant differences in favour of FP were seen over the 12 weeks for mean evening PEF (p = 0.04), diurnal PEF variation (p = 0.03) and percentage predicted PEF (p = 0.003), as well as forced expiratory volume (p = 0.008), forced vital capacity (p = 0.02) and PEF (p = 0.005) measured at clinic visits. The median percentage of symptom-free nights increased over the 12-week study period in both treatment groups, with similar changes seen for the median percentage of days with symptom score < 2, rescue medication use and exacerbations of asthma. The incidence of adverse events was found to be comparable in the two treatment groups. The geometric mean ratios of serum cortisol levels were found to be 1.03 for FP, indicating no mean hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression from baseline, and 0.93 for BUD (p = 0.0002 compared with FP). In summary, FP 800 μg daily showed a greater efficacy/safety ratio in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma than BUD 1600 μg daily. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1996-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2365805/ /pubmed/18475734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0962935196000555 Text en Copyright © 1996 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ringdal, N.
Swinburn, P.
Backman, R.
Plaschke, P.
Sips, A. P.
Kjaersgaard, P.
Bratten, G.
Harris, T. A. J.
A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
title A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
title_full A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
title_fullStr A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
title_full_unstemmed A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
title_short A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
title_sort blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2365805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18475734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0962935196000555
work_keys_str_mv AT ringdaln ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT swinburnp ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT backmanr ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT plaschkep ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT sipsap ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT kjaersgaardp ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT bratteng ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT harristaj ablindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT ringdaln blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT swinburnp blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT backmanr blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT plaschkep blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT sipsap blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT kjaersgaardp blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT bratteng blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation
AT harristaj blindedcomparisonoffluticasonepropionatewithbudesonideviapowderdevicesinadultpatientswithmoderatetosevereasthmaaclinicalevaluation