Cargando…
Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data
Non-parametric linkage methods have had limited success in detecting gene by gene interactions. Using affected sibling-pair (ASP) data from all replicates of the simulated data from Problem 3, we assessed the statistical power of three approaches to identify the gene × gene interaction between two l...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2367530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18466567 |
_version_ | 1782154313856974848 |
---|---|
author | Larkin, Emma K Morris, Nathan J Li, Yali Nock, Nora L Stein, Catherine M |
author_facet | Larkin, Emma K Morris, Nathan J Li, Yali Nock, Nora L Stein, Catherine M |
author_sort | Larkin, Emma K |
collection | PubMed |
description | Non-parametric linkage methods have had limited success in detecting gene by gene interactions. Using affected sibling-pair (ASP) data from all replicates of the simulated data from Problem 3, we assessed the statistical power of three approaches to identify the gene × gene interaction between two loci on different chromosomes. The first method conditioned on linkage at the primary disease susceptibility locus (DR), to find linkage to a simulated effect modifier at Locus A with a mean allele sharing test. The second approach used a regression-based mean test to identify either the presence of interaction between the two loci or linkage to the A locus in the presence of linkage to DR. The third method applied a conditional logistic model designed to test for the presence of interacting loci. The first approach had decreased power over an unconditional linkage analysis, supporting the idea that gene × gene interaction cannot be detected with ASP data. The regression-based mean test and the conditional logistic model had the lowest power to detect gene × gene interaction, possibly because of the complex recoding of the tri-allelic DR locus for use as a covariate. We conclude that the ASP approaches tested have low power to successfully identify the interaction between the DR and A loci despite the large sample size, which may be due to the low prevalence of the high-risk DR genotypes. Additionally, the lack of data on discordant sibships may have decreased the power to identify gene × gene interactions. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2367530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23675302008-05-06 Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data Larkin, Emma K Morris, Nathan J Li, Yali Nock, Nora L Stein, Catherine M BMC Proc Proceedings Non-parametric linkage methods have had limited success in detecting gene by gene interactions. Using affected sibling-pair (ASP) data from all replicates of the simulated data from Problem 3, we assessed the statistical power of three approaches to identify the gene × gene interaction between two loci on different chromosomes. The first method conditioned on linkage at the primary disease susceptibility locus (DR), to find linkage to a simulated effect modifier at Locus A with a mean allele sharing test. The second approach used a regression-based mean test to identify either the presence of interaction between the two loci or linkage to the A locus in the presence of linkage to DR. The third method applied a conditional logistic model designed to test for the presence of interacting loci. The first approach had decreased power over an unconditional linkage analysis, supporting the idea that gene × gene interaction cannot be detected with ASP data. The regression-based mean test and the conditional logistic model had the lowest power to detect gene × gene interaction, possibly because of the complex recoding of the tri-allelic DR locus for use as a covariate. We conclude that the ASP approaches tested have low power to successfully identify the interaction between the DR and A loci despite the large sample size, which may be due to the low prevalence of the high-risk DR genotypes. Additionally, the lack of data on discordant sibships may have decreased the power to identify gene × gene interactions. BioMed Central 2007-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2367530/ /pubmed/18466567 Text en Copyright © 2007 Larkin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Proceedings Larkin, Emma K Morris, Nathan J Li, Yali Nock, Nora L Stein, Catherine M Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data |
title | Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data |
title_full | Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data |
title_fullStr | Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data |
title_short | Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data |
title_sort | comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in gaw15 simulated data |
topic | Proceedings |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2367530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18466567 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT larkinemmak comparisonofaffectedsiblingpairlinkagemethodstoidentifygenegeneinteractioningaw15simulateddata AT morrisnathanj comparisonofaffectedsiblingpairlinkagemethodstoidentifygenegeneinteractioningaw15simulateddata AT liyali comparisonofaffectedsiblingpairlinkagemethodstoidentifygenegeneinteractioningaw15simulateddata AT nocknoral comparisonofaffectedsiblingpairlinkagemethodstoidentifygenegeneinteractioningaw15simulateddata AT steincatherinem comparisonofaffectedsiblingpairlinkagemethodstoidentifygenegeneinteractioningaw15simulateddata |