Cargando…

Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data

Non-parametric linkage methods have had limited success in detecting gene by gene interactions. Using affected sibling-pair (ASP) data from all replicates of the simulated data from Problem 3, we assessed the statistical power of three approaches to identify the gene × gene interaction between two l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larkin, Emma K, Morris, Nathan J, Li, Yali, Nock, Nora L, Stein, Catherine M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2367530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18466567
_version_ 1782154313856974848
author Larkin, Emma K
Morris, Nathan J
Li, Yali
Nock, Nora L
Stein, Catherine M
author_facet Larkin, Emma K
Morris, Nathan J
Li, Yali
Nock, Nora L
Stein, Catherine M
author_sort Larkin, Emma K
collection PubMed
description Non-parametric linkage methods have had limited success in detecting gene by gene interactions. Using affected sibling-pair (ASP) data from all replicates of the simulated data from Problem 3, we assessed the statistical power of three approaches to identify the gene × gene interaction between two loci on different chromosomes. The first method conditioned on linkage at the primary disease susceptibility locus (DR), to find linkage to a simulated effect modifier at Locus A with a mean allele sharing test. The second approach used a regression-based mean test to identify either the presence of interaction between the two loci or linkage to the A locus in the presence of linkage to DR. The third method applied a conditional logistic model designed to test for the presence of interacting loci. The first approach had decreased power over an unconditional linkage analysis, supporting the idea that gene × gene interaction cannot be detected with ASP data. The regression-based mean test and the conditional logistic model had the lowest power to detect gene × gene interaction, possibly because of the complex recoding of the tri-allelic DR locus for use as a covariate. We conclude that the ASP approaches tested have low power to successfully identify the interaction between the DR and A loci despite the large sample size, which may be due to the low prevalence of the high-risk DR genotypes. Additionally, the lack of data on discordant sibships may have decreased the power to identify gene × gene interactions.
format Text
id pubmed-2367530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23675302008-05-06 Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data Larkin, Emma K Morris, Nathan J Li, Yali Nock, Nora L Stein, Catherine M BMC Proc Proceedings Non-parametric linkage methods have had limited success in detecting gene by gene interactions. Using affected sibling-pair (ASP) data from all replicates of the simulated data from Problem 3, we assessed the statistical power of three approaches to identify the gene × gene interaction between two loci on different chromosomes. The first method conditioned on linkage at the primary disease susceptibility locus (DR), to find linkage to a simulated effect modifier at Locus A with a mean allele sharing test. The second approach used a regression-based mean test to identify either the presence of interaction between the two loci or linkage to the A locus in the presence of linkage to DR. The third method applied a conditional logistic model designed to test for the presence of interacting loci. The first approach had decreased power over an unconditional linkage analysis, supporting the idea that gene × gene interaction cannot be detected with ASP data. The regression-based mean test and the conditional logistic model had the lowest power to detect gene × gene interaction, possibly because of the complex recoding of the tri-allelic DR locus for use as a covariate. We conclude that the ASP approaches tested have low power to successfully identify the interaction between the DR and A loci despite the large sample size, which may be due to the low prevalence of the high-risk DR genotypes. Additionally, the lack of data on discordant sibships may have decreased the power to identify gene × gene interactions. BioMed Central 2007-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2367530/ /pubmed/18466567 Text en Copyright © 2007 Larkin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Larkin, Emma K
Morris, Nathan J
Li, Yali
Nock, Nora L
Stein, Catherine M
Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data
title Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data
title_full Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data
title_fullStr Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data
title_short Comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in GAW15 simulated data
title_sort comparison of affected sibling-pair linkage methods to identify gene × gene interaction in gaw15 simulated data
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2367530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18466567
work_keys_str_mv AT larkinemmak comparisonofaffectedsiblingpairlinkagemethodstoidentifygenegeneinteractioningaw15simulateddata
AT morrisnathanj comparisonofaffectedsiblingpairlinkagemethodstoidentifygenegeneinteractioningaw15simulateddata
AT liyali comparisonofaffectedsiblingpairlinkagemethodstoidentifygenegeneinteractioningaw15simulateddata
AT nocknoral comparisonofaffectedsiblingpairlinkagemethodstoidentifygenegeneinteractioningaw15simulateddata
AT steincatherinem comparisonofaffectedsiblingpairlinkagemethodstoidentifygenegeneinteractioningaw15simulateddata