Cargando…
Comparing strategies for evaluation of candidate genes in case-control studies using family data
The goal of this analysis is to compare different test strategies for genetic association in case-control studies using related individuals. The first test is the trend test that is corrected for related individuals on the basis of identity-by-descent information. The second approach is to use gener...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2367598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18466529 |
_version_ | 1782154330494730240 |
---|---|
author | Tian, Xin Joo, Jungnam Wu, Colin O Lin, Jing-Ping |
author_facet | Tian, Xin Joo, Jungnam Wu, Colin O Lin, Jing-Ping |
author_sort | Tian, Xin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The goal of this analysis is to compare different test strategies for genetic association in case-control studies using related individuals. The first test is the trend test that is corrected for related individuals on the basis of identity-by-descent information. The second approach is to use generalized estimating equations to adjust for the correlation between relatives, and the third is the multiple outputation method. We compare the power of these test strategies in a simulation study, and apply these methods to a candidate gene dataset of Genetic Analysis Workshop 15 from the North American Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2367598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23675982008-05-06 Comparing strategies for evaluation of candidate genes in case-control studies using family data Tian, Xin Joo, Jungnam Wu, Colin O Lin, Jing-Ping BMC Proc Proceedings The goal of this analysis is to compare different test strategies for genetic association in case-control studies using related individuals. The first test is the trend test that is corrected for related individuals on the basis of identity-by-descent information. The second approach is to use generalized estimating equations to adjust for the correlation between relatives, and the third is the multiple outputation method. We compare the power of these test strategies in a simulation study, and apply these methods to a candidate gene dataset of Genetic Analysis Workshop 15 from the North American Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium. BioMed Central 2007-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2367598/ /pubmed/18466529 Text en Copyright © 2007 Tian et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Proceedings Tian, Xin Joo, Jungnam Wu, Colin O Lin, Jing-Ping Comparing strategies for evaluation of candidate genes in case-control studies using family data |
title | Comparing strategies for evaluation of candidate genes in case-control studies using family data |
title_full | Comparing strategies for evaluation of candidate genes in case-control studies using family data |
title_fullStr | Comparing strategies for evaluation of candidate genes in case-control studies using family data |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing strategies for evaluation of candidate genes in case-control studies using family data |
title_short | Comparing strategies for evaluation of candidate genes in case-control studies using family data |
title_sort | comparing strategies for evaluation of candidate genes in case-control studies using family data |
topic | Proceedings |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2367598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18466529 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tianxin comparingstrategiesforevaluationofcandidategenesincasecontrolstudiesusingfamilydata AT joojungnam comparingstrategiesforevaluationofcandidategenesincasecontrolstudiesusingfamilydata AT wucolino comparingstrategiesforevaluationofcandidategenesincasecontrolstudiesusingfamilydata AT linjingping comparingstrategiesforevaluationofcandidategenesincasecontrolstudiesusingfamilydata |