Cargando…

Radical hysterectomy in the elderly

BACKGROUND: The considerable increase in life expectancy on one hand and an increase in cervical cancer among Iranian patients on the other, brings out the importance of investigating whether radical surgery can be performed safely and effectively on patients above 60 years of age. METHODS: In a stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mousavi, Azamsadat, Karimi Zarchi, Mojgan, Modares Gilani, Mitra, Behtash, Nadereh, Ghaemmaghami, Fatemeh, Shams, Maryam, Irvanipoor, Maryam
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2373299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18394193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-6-38
_version_ 1782154365678649344
author Mousavi, Azamsadat
Karimi Zarchi, Mojgan
Modares Gilani, Mitra
Behtash, Nadereh
Ghaemmaghami, Fatemeh
Shams, Maryam
Irvanipoor, Maryam
author_facet Mousavi, Azamsadat
Karimi Zarchi, Mojgan
Modares Gilani, Mitra
Behtash, Nadereh
Ghaemmaghami, Fatemeh
Shams, Maryam
Irvanipoor, Maryam
author_sort Mousavi, Azamsadat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The considerable increase in life expectancy on one hand and an increase in cervical cancer among Iranian patients on the other, brings out the importance of investigating whether radical surgery can be performed safely and effectively on patients above 60 years of age. METHODS: In a study of historical cohort, all 22 patients 60 years and above who have undergone a Wertheim radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer from 1999 to 2005 were compared with 128 matched cases under 60 years of age who had undergone a Wertheim hysterectomy during the same calendar year. All patients were analyzed for preexisting medical comorbidities, length of postoperative stay, morbidity, and postoperative mortality. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality in either group, morbidity (minor, p = 0.91; major, p = 0.89) were statistically not different in the two groups despite the patient's above 60 years having significantly higher comorbidity prior to surgery than the younger cohort (minor, P < 0.05; major, P < 0.05). The mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the older patients (5 days vs. 3 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Wertheim Radical hysterectomy is a safe surgical procedure in the selected population of patients 60 years and over. No differences in operative mortality or morbidity were found when compared to a cohort of patient's aged 60 years or younger.
format Text
id pubmed-2373299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23732992008-05-07 Radical hysterectomy in the elderly Mousavi, Azamsadat Karimi Zarchi, Mojgan Modares Gilani, Mitra Behtash, Nadereh Ghaemmaghami, Fatemeh Shams, Maryam Irvanipoor, Maryam World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The considerable increase in life expectancy on one hand and an increase in cervical cancer among Iranian patients on the other, brings out the importance of investigating whether radical surgery can be performed safely and effectively on patients above 60 years of age. METHODS: In a study of historical cohort, all 22 patients 60 years and above who have undergone a Wertheim radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer from 1999 to 2005 were compared with 128 matched cases under 60 years of age who had undergone a Wertheim hysterectomy during the same calendar year. All patients were analyzed for preexisting medical comorbidities, length of postoperative stay, morbidity, and postoperative mortality. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality in either group, morbidity (minor, p = 0.91; major, p = 0.89) were statistically not different in the two groups despite the patient's above 60 years having significantly higher comorbidity prior to surgery than the younger cohort (minor, P < 0.05; major, P < 0.05). The mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the older patients (5 days vs. 3 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Wertheim Radical hysterectomy is a safe surgical procedure in the selected population of patients 60 years and over. No differences in operative mortality or morbidity were found when compared to a cohort of patient's aged 60 years or younger. BioMed Central 2008-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2373299/ /pubmed/18394193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-6-38 Text en Copyright © 2008 Mousavi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Mousavi, Azamsadat
Karimi Zarchi, Mojgan
Modares Gilani, Mitra
Behtash, Nadereh
Ghaemmaghami, Fatemeh
Shams, Maryam
Irvanipoor, Maryam
Radical hysterectomy in the elderly
title Radical hysterectomy in the elderly
title_full Radical hysterectomy in the elderly
title_fullStr Radical hysterectomy in the elderly
title_full_unstemmed Radical hysterectomy in the elderly
title_short Radical hysterectomy in the elderly
title_sort radical hysterectomy in the elderly
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2373299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18394193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-6-38
work_keys_str_mv AT mousaviazamsadat radicalhysterectomyintheelderly
AT karimizarchimojgan radicalhysterectomyintheelderly
AT modaresgilanimitra radicalhysterectomyintheelderly
AT behtashnadereh radicalhysterectomyintheelderly
AT ghaemmaghamifatemeh radicalhysterectomyintheelderly
AT shamsmaryam radicalhysterectomyintheelderly
AT irvanipoormaryam radicalhysterectomyintheelderly