Cargando…
Impact of organised programs on colorectal cancer screening
PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been shown to decrease CRC mortality. Organised mass screening programs are being implemented in France. Its perception in the general population and by general practitioners is not well known. METHODS: Two nationwide observational telephone surveys wer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2373301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18412950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-104 |
_version_ | 1782154366196645888 |
---|---|
author | Eisinger, François Cals, Laurent Calazel-Benque, Anne Blay, Jean-Yves Coscas, Yvan Dolbeault, Sylvie Namer, Moïse Pivot, Xavier Rixe, Olivier Serin, Daniel Roussel, Claire Morère, Jean-François |
author_facet | Eisinger, François Cals, Laurent Calazel-Benque, Anne Blay, Jean-Yves Coscas, Yvan Dolbeault, Sylvie Namer, Moïse Pivot, Xavier Rixe, Olivier Serin, Daniel Roussel, Claire Morère, Jean-François |
author_sort | Eisinger, François |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been shown to decrease CRC mortality. Organised mass screening programs are being implemented in France. Its perception in the general population and by general practitioners is not well known. METHODS: Two nationwide observational telephone surveys were conducted in early 2005. First among a representative sample of subjects living in France and aged between 50 and 74 years that covered both geographical departments with and without implemented screening services. Second among General Practionners (Gps). Descriptive and multiple logistic regression was carried out. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of the persons(N = 1509) reported having undergone at least one CRC screening, 18% of the 600 interviewed GPs reported recommending a screening test for CRC systematically to their patients aged 50–74 years. The odds ratio (OR) of having undergone a screening test using FOBT was 3.91 (95% CI: 2.49–6.16) for those living in organised departments (referent group living in departments without organised screening), almost twice as high as impact educational level (OR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.19–3.47). CONCLUSION: CRC screening is improved in geographical departments where it is organised by health authorities. In France, an organised screening programs decrease inequalities for CRC screening. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2373301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23733012008-05-07 Impact of organised programs on colorectal cancer screening Eisinger, François Cals, Laurent Calazel-Benque, Anne Blay, Jean-Yves Coscas, Yvan Dolbeault, Sylvie Namer, Moïse Pivot, Xavier Rixe, Olivier Serin, Daniel Roussel, Claire Morère, Jean-François BMC Cancer Research Article PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been shown to decrease CRC mortality. Organised mass screening programs are being implemented in France. Its perception in the general population and by general practitioners is not well known. METHODS: Two nationwide observational telephone surveys were conducted in early 2005. First among a representative sample of subjects living in France and aged between 50 and 74 years that covered both geographical departments with and without implemented screening services. Second among General Practionners (Gps). Descriptive and multiple logistic regression was carried out. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of the persons(N = 1509) reported having undergone at least one CRC screening, 18% of the 600 interviewed GPs reported recommending a screening test for CRC systematically to their patients aged 50–74 years. The odds ratio (OR) of having undergone a screening test using FOBT was 3.91 (95% CI: 2.49–6.16) for those living in organised departments (referent group living in departments without organised screening), almost twice as high as impact educational level (OR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.19–3.47). CONCLUSION: CRC screening is improved in geographical departments where it is organised by health authorities. In France, an organised screening programs decrease inequalities for CRC screening. BioMed Central 2008-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2373301/ /pubmed/18412950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-104 Text en Copyright © 2008 Eisinger et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Eisinger, François Cals, Laurent Calazel-Benque, Anne Blay, Jean-Yves Coscas, Yvan Dolbeault, Sylvie Namer, Moïse Pivot, Xavier Rixe, Olivier Serin, Daniel Roussel, Claire Morère, Jean-François Impact of organised programs on colorectal cancer screening |
title | Impact of organised programs on colorectal cancer screening |
title_full | Impact of organised programs on colorectal cancer screening |
title_fullStr | Impact of organised programs on colorectal cancer screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of organised programs on colorectal cancer screening |
title_short | Impact of organised programs on colorectal cancer screening |
title_sort | impact of organised programs on colorectal cancer screening |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2373301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18412950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eisingerfrancois impactoforganisedprogramsoncolorectalcancerscreening AT calslaurent impactoforganisedprogramsoncolorectalcancerscreening AT calazelbenqueanne impactoforganisedprogramsoncolorectalcancerscreening AT blayjeanyves impactoforganisedprogramsoncolorectalcancerscreening AT coscasyvan impactoforganisedprogramsoncolorectalcancerscreening AT dolbeaultsylvie impactoforganisedprogramsoncolorectalcancerscreening AT namermoise impactoforganisedprogramsoncolorectalcancerscreening AT pivotxavier impactoforganisedprogramsoncolorectalcancerscreening AT rixeolivier impactoforganisedprogramsoncolorectalcancerscreening AT serindaniel impactoforganisedprogramsoncolorectalcancerscreening AT rousselclaire impactoforganisedprogramsoncolorectalcancerscreening AT morerejeanfrancois impactoforganisedprogramsoncolorectalcancerscreening AT impactoforganisedprogramsoncolorectalcancerscreening |