Cargando…

Morphometric grading of breast cancer: thresholds for tubular differentiation

We evaluated the degree of tubular differentiation in 172 samples of invasive ductal breast cancer in order to determine numerical thresholds for histological breast cancer grading. The tubular differentiation in each sample was defined as the fraction of fields showing tubular differentiation (FTD)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kronqvist, P, Kuopio, T, Collan, Y
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10817500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1222
_version_ 1782154469048320000
author Kronqvist, P
Kuopio, T
Collan, Y
author_facet Kronqvist, P
Kuopio, T
Collan, Y
author_sort Kronqvist, P
collection PubMed
description We evaluated the degree of tubular differentiation in 172 samples of invasive ductal breast cancer in order to determine numerical thresholds for histological breast cancer grading. The tubular differentiation in each sample was defined as the fraction of fields showing tubular differentiation (FTD). The analysis was based on Kaplan–Meier curves reflecting survival and recurrence of disease, univariate and multivariate analyses of Cox's regression, and maximum efficiencies of ROC analysis. The minimum P -value cut-off for FTD was determined at 59%. The practical interpretation is that tubular differentiation in the neoplasm observed in at least 60% of microscopical fields in the tumour area indicates favourable prognosis of disease. The relative risks for breast cancer death for patients with FTD below 59% as compared with those with FTD above 59% were 6.7- and 6.3-fold (univariate and multivariate analyses respectively). Another threshold could be determined at FTD 23%, although this threshold was associated with clearly lower statistical significancies. The paper introduces two possible solutions for application of the thresholds to the morphometric breast cancer grading system. The study also emphasizes the clinical relevance of the evaluation of tubular differentiation in breast cancer. The consistent morphometric evaluation method was vital in allowing the full weight of the biological significance of tubular differentiation to emerge. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign
format Text
id pubmed-2374503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2000
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23745032009-09-10 Morphometric grading of breast cancer: thresholds for tubular differentiation Kronqvist, P Kuopio, T Collan, Y Br J Cancer Regular Article We evaluated the degree of tubular differentiation in 172 samples of invasive ductal breast cancer in order to determine numerical thresholds for histological breast cancer grading. The tubular differentiation in each sample was defined as the fraction of fields showing tubular differentiation (FTD). The analysis was based on Kaplan–Meier curves reflecting survival and recurrence of disease, univariate and multivariate analyses of Cox's regression, and maximum efficiencies of ROC analysis. The minimum P -value cut-off for FTD was determined at 59%. The practical interpretation is that tubular differentiation in the neoplasm observed in at least 60% of microscopical fields in the tumour area indicates favourable prognosis of disease. The relative risks for breast cancer death for patients with FTD below 59% as compared with those with FTD above 59% were 6.7- and 6.3-fold (univariate and multivariate analyses respectively). Another threshold could be determined at FTD 23%, although this threshold was associated with clearly lower statistical significancies. The paper introduces two possible solutions for application of the thresholds to the morphometric breast cancer grading system. The study also emphasizes the clinical relevance of the evaluation of tubular differentiation in breast cancer. The consistent morphometric evaluation method was vital in allowing the full weight of the biological significance of tubular differentiation to emerge. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign Nature Publishing Group 2000-05 2000-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2374503/ /pubmed/10817500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1222 Text en Copyright © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Kronqvist, P
Kuopio, T
Collan, Y
Morphometric grading of breast cancer: thresholds for tubular differentiation
title Morphometric grading of breast cancer: thresholds for tubular differentiation
title_full Morphometric grading of breast cancer: thresholds for tubular differentiation
title_fullStr Morphometric grading of breast cancer: thresholds for tubular differentiation
title_full_unstemmed Morphometric grading of breast cancer: thresholds for tubular differentiation
title_short Morphometric grading of breast cancer: thresholds for tubular differentiation
title_sort morphometric grading of breast cancer: thresholds for tubular differentiation
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10817500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1222
work_keys_str_mv AT kronqvistp morphometricgradingofbreastcancerthresholdsfortubulardifferentiation
AT kuopiot morphometricgradingofbreastcancerthresholdsfortubulardifferentiation
AT collany morphometricgradingofbreastcancerthresholdsfortubulardifferentiation