Cargando…
Determinants of tracheostomy decannulation: an international survey
BACKGROUND: Although tracheostomy is probably the most common surgical procedure performed on critically ill patients, it is unknown when a tracheostomy tube can be safely removed. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey of physicians and respiratory therapists with expertise in the managemen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18302759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6802 |
_version_ | 1782154498609774592 |
---|---|
author | Stelfox, Henry Thomas Crimi, Claudia Berra, Lorenzo Noto, Alberto Schmidt, Ulrich Bigatello, Luca M Hess, Dean |
author_facet | Stelfox, Henry Thomas Crimi, Claudia Berra, Lorenzo Noto, Alberto Schmidt, Ulrich Bigatello, Luca M Hess, Dean |
author_sort | Stelfox, Henry Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although tracheostomy is probably the most common surgical procedure performed on critically ill patients, it is unknown when a tracheostomy tube can be safely removed. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey of physicians and respiratory therapists with expertise in the management of tracheostomized patients at 118 medical centers to characterize contemporary opinions about tracheostomy decannulation practice and to define factors that influence these practices. RESULTS: We surveyed 309 clinicians, of whom 225 responded (73%). Clinicians rated patient level of consciousness, ability to tolerate tracheostomy tube capping, cough effectiveness, and secretions as the most important factors in the decision to decannulate a patient. Decannulation failure was defined as the need to reinsert an artificial airway within 48 hours (45% of respondents) to 96 hours (20% of respondents) of tracheostomy removal, and 2% to 5% was the most frequent recommendation for an acceptable recannulation rate (44% of respondents). In clinical scenarios, clinicians who worked in chronic care facilities (30%) were less likely to recommend decannulation than clinicians who worked in weaning (47%), rehabilitation (53%), or acute care (55%) facilities (p = 0.015). Patients were most likely to be recommended for decannulation if they were alert and interactive (odds ratio [OR] 4.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.27 to 6.90; p < 0.001), had a strong cough (OR 3.84, 95% CI 2.66 to 5.54; p < 0.001), had scant thin secretions (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.56 to 3.19; p < 0.001), and required minimal supplemental oxygen (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.86; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patient level of consciousness, cough effectiveness, secretions, and oxygenation are important determinants of clinicians' tracheostomy decannulation opinions. Most surveyed clinicians defined decannulation failure as the need to reinsert an artificial airway within 48 to 96 hours of planned tracheostomy removal. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2374629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23746292008-05-09 Determinants of tracheostomy decannulation: an international survey Stelfox, Henry Thomas Crimi, Claudia Berra, Lorenzo Noto, Alberto Schmidt, Ulrich Bigatello, Luca M Hess, Dean Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Although tracheostomy is probably the most common surgical procedure performed on critically ill patients, it is unknown when a tracheostomy tube can be safely removed. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey of physicians and respiratory therapists with expertise in the management of tracheostomized patients at 118 medical centers to characterize contemporary opinions about tracheostomy decannulation practice and to define factors that influence these practices. RESULTS: We surveyed 309 clinicians, of whom 225 responded (73%). Clinicians rated patient level of consciousness, ability to tolerate tracheostomy tube capping, cough effectiveness, and secretions as the most important factors in the decision to decannulate a patient. Decannulation failure was defined as the need to reinsert an artificial airway within 48 hours (45% of respondents) to 96 hours (20% of respondents) of tracheostomy removal, and 2% to 5% was the most frequent recommendation for an acceptable recannulation rate (44% of respondents). In clinical scenarios, clinicians who worked in chronic care facilities (30%) were less likely to recommend decannulation than clinicians who worked in weaning (47%), rehabilitation (53%), or acute care (55%) facilities (p = 0.015). Patients were most likely to be recommended for decannulation if they were alert and interactive (odds ratio [OR] 4.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.27 to 6.90; p < 0.001), had a strong cough (OR 3.84, 95% CI 2.66 to 5.54; p < 0.001), had scant thin secretions (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.56 to 3.19; p < 0.001), and required minimal supplemental oxygen (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.86; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patient level of consciousness, cough effectiveness, secretions, and oxygenation are important determinants of clinicians' tracheostomy decannulation opinions. Most surveyed clinicians defined decannulation failure as the need to reinsert an artificial airway within 48 to 96 hours of planned tracheostomy removal. BioMed Central 2008 2008-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2374629/ /pubmed/18302759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6802 Text en Copyright © 2008 Stelfox et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Stelfox, Henry Thomas Crimi, Claudia Berra, Lorenzo Noto, Alberto Schmidt, Ulrich Bigatello, Luca M Hess, Dean Determinants of tracheostomy decannulation: an international survey |
title | Determinants of tracheostomy decannulation: an international survey |
title_full | Determinants of tracheostomy decannulation: an international survey |
title_fullStr | Determinants of tracheostomy decannulation: an international survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Determinants of tracheostomy decannulation: an international survey |
title_short | Determinants of tracheostomy decannulation: an international survey |
title_sort | determinants of tracheostomy decannulation: an international survey |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18302759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6802 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stelfoxhenrythomas determinantsoftracheostomydecannulationaninternationalsurvey AT crimiclaudia determinantsoftracheostomydecannulationaninternationalsurvey AT berralorenzo determinantsoftracheostomydecannulationaninternationalsurvey AT notoalberto determinantsoftracheostomydecannulationaninternationalsurvey AT schmidtulrich determinantsoftracheostomydecannulationaninternationalsurvey AT bigatellolucam determinantsoftracheostomydecannulationaninternationalsurvey AT hessdean determinantsoftracheostomydecannulationaninternationalsurvey |