Cargando…

Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICU

BACKGROUND: Pain in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is common. However, pain assessment in critically ill patients often is complicated because these patients are unable to communicate effectively. Therefore, we designed a study (a) to determine the inter-rater reliability o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahlers, Sabine JGM, van Gulik, Laura, van der Veen, Aletta M, van Dongen, Hendricus PA, Bruins, Peter, Belitser, Svetlana V, de Boer, Anthonius, Tibboel, Dick, Knibbe, Catherijne AJ
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18279522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6789
_version_ 1782154500873650176
author Ahlers, Sabine JGM
van Gulik, Laura
van der Veen, Aletta M
van Dongen, Hendricus PA
Bruins, Peter
Belitser, Svetlana V
de Boer, Anthonius
Tibboel, Dick
Knibbe, Catherijne AJ
author_facet Ahlers, Sabine JGM
van Gulik, Laura
van der Veen, Aletta M
van Dongen, Hendricus PA
Bruins, Peter
Belitser, Svetlana V
de Boer, Anthonius
Tibboel, Dick
Knibbe, Catherijne AJ
author_sort Ahlers, Sabine JGM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pain in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is common. However, pain assessment in critically ill patients often is complicated because these patients are unable to communicate effectively. Therefore, we designed a study (a) to determine the inter-rater reliability of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS), (b) to compare pain scores of different observers and the patient, and (c) to compare NRS, BPS, and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for measuring pain in patients in the ICU. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study in 113 non-paralyzed critically ill patients. The attending nurses, two researchers, and the patient (when possible) obtained 371 independent observation series of NRS, BPS, and VAS. Data analyses were performed on the sample size of patients (n = 113). RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability of the NRS and BPS proved to be adequate (kappa = 0.71 and 0.67, respectively). The level of agreement within one scale point between NRS rated by the patient and NRS scored by attending nurses was 73%. However, high patient scores (NRS ≥4) were underestimated by nurses (patients 33% versus nurses 18%). In responsive patients, a high correlation between NRS and VAS was found (r(s )= 0.84, P < 0.001). In ventilated patients, a moderate positive correlation was found between the NRS and the BPS (r(s )= 0.55, P < 0.001). However, whereas 6% of the observations were NRS of greater than or equal to 4, BPS scores were all very low (median 3.0, range 3.0 to 5.0). CONCLUSION: The different scales show a high reliability, but observer-based evaluation often underestimates the pain, particularly in the case of high NRS values (≥4) rated by the patient. Therefore, whenever this is possible, ICU patients should rate their pain. In unresponsive patients, primarily the attending nurse involved in daily care should score the patient's pain. In ventilated patients, the BPS should be used only in conjunction with the NRS nurse to measure pain levels in the absence of painful stimuli.
format Text
id pubmed-2374638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23746382008-05-09 Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICU Ahlers, Sabine JGM van Gulik, Laura van der Veen, Aletta M van Dongen, Hendricus PA Bruins, Peter Belitser, Svetlana V de Boer, Anthonius Tibboel, Dick Knibbe, Catherijne AJ Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Pain in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is common. However, pain assessment in critically ill patients often is complicated because these patients are unable to communicate effectively. Therefore, we designed a study (a) to determine the inter-rater reliability of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS), (b) to compare pain scores of different observers and the patient, and (c) to compare NRS, BPS, and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for measuring pain in patients in the ICU. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study in 113 non-paralyzed critically ill patients. The attending nurses, two researchers, and the patient (when possible) obtained 371 independent observation series of NRS, BPS, and VAS. Data analyses were performed on the sample size of patients (n = 113). RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability of the NRS and BPS proved to be adequate (kappa = 0.71 and 0.67, respectively). The level of agreement within one scale point between NRS rated by the patient and NRS scored by attending nurses was 73%. However, high patient scores (NRS ≥4) were underestimated by nurses (patients 33% versus nurses 18%). In responsive patients, a high correlation between NRS and VAS was found (r(s )= 0.84, P < 0.001). In ventilated patients, a moderate positive correlation was found between the NRS and the BPS (r(s )= 0.55, P < 0.001). However, whereas 6% of the observations were NRS of greater than or equal to 4, BPS scores were all very low (median 3.0, range 3.0 to 5.0). CONCLUSION: The different scales show a high reliability, but observer-based evaluation often underestimates the pain, particularly in the case of high NRS values (≥4) rated by the patient. Therefore, whenever this is possible, ICU patients should rate their pain. In unresponsive patients, primarily the attending nurse involved in daily care should score the patient's pain. In ventilated patients, the BPS should be used only in conjunction with the NRS nurse to measure pain levels in the absence of painful stimuli. BioMed Central 2008 2008-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2374638/ /pubmed/18279522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6789 Text en Copyright © 2008 Ahlers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ahlers, Sabine JGM
van Gulik, Laura
van der Veen, Aletta M
van Dongen, Hendricus PA
Bruins, Peter
Belitser, Svetlana V
de Boer, Anthonius
Tibboel, Dick
Knibbe, Catherijne AJ
Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICU
title Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICU
title_full Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICU
title_fullStr Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICU
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICU
title_short Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICU
title_sort comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general icu
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18279522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6789
work_keys_str_mv AT ahlerssabinejgm comparisonofdifferentpainscoringsystemsincriticallyillpatientsinageneralicu
AT vanguliklaura comparisonofdifferentpainscoringsystemsincriticallyillpatientsinageneralicu
AT vanderveenalettam comparisonofdifferentpainscoringsystemsincriticallyillpatientsinageneralicu
AT vandongenhendricuspa comparisonofdifferentpainscoringsystemsincriticallyillpatientsinageneralicu
AT bruinspeter comparisonofdifferentpainscoringsystemsincriticallyillpatientsinageneralicu
AT belitsersvetlanav comparisonofdifferentpainscoringsystemsincriticallyillpatientsinageneralicu
AT deboeranthonius comparisonofdifferentpainscoringsystemsincriticallyillpatientsinageneralicu
AT tibboeldick comparisonofdifferentpainscoringsystemsincriticallyillpatientsinageneralicu
AT knibbecatherijneaj comparisonofdifferentpainscoringsystemsincriticallyillpatientsinageneralicu