Cargando…

Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer – a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome

Three hundred patients with symptomatic, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC not requiring immediate radiotherapy were enrolled into this randomized multicentre trial comparing gemcitabine + BSC vs BSC alone. Patients allocated gemcitabine received 1000 mg/m(2)on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, H, Hopwood, P, Stephens, R J, Thatcher, N, Cottier, B, Nicholson, M, Milroy, R, Maughan, T S, Falk, S J, Bond, M G, Burt, P A, Connolly, C K, McIllmurray, M B, Carmichael, J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10945489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1307
_version_ 1782154506491920384
author Anderson, H
Hopwood, P
Stephens, R J
Thatcher, N
Cottier, B
Nicholson, M
Milroy, R
Maughan, T S
Falk, S J
Bond, M G
Burt, P A
Connolly, C K
McIllmurray, M B
Carmichael, J
author_facet Anderson, H
Hopwood, P
Stephens, R J
Thatcher, N
Cottier, B
Nicholson, M
Milroy, R
Maughan, T S
Falk, S J
Bond, M G
Burt, P A
Connolly, C K
McIllmurray, M B
Carmichael, J
author_sort Anderson, H
collection PubMed
description Three hundred patients with symptomatic, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC not requiring immediate radiotherapy were enrolled into this randomized multicentre trial comparing gemcitabine + BSC vs BSC alone. Patients allocated gemcitabine received 1000 mg/m(2)on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, for a maximum of six cycles. The main aim of this trial was to compare patient assessment of a predefined subset of commonly reported symptoms (SS14) from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 scales. The primary end-points were defined as (1) the percentage change in mean SS14 score between baseline and 2 months and (2) the proportion of patients with a marked (≥ 25%) improvement in SS14 score between baseline and 2 months sustained for ≥4 weeks. The secondary objectives were to compare treatments with respect to overall survival, and multidimensional QL parameters.The treatment groups were balanced with regard to age, gender, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and disease stage (40% had metastatic disease). The percentage change in mean SS14 score from baseline to 2 months was a 10% decrease (i.e. improvement) for gemcitabine plus BSC and a 1% increase (i.e. deterioration) for BSC alone (P = 0.113, two-sample t -test). A sustained (≥ 4 weeks) improvement (≥25%) on SS14 was recorded in a significantly higher proportion of gemcitabine + BSC patients (22%) than in BSC alone patients (9%) (P = 0.0014, Pearson’s chi-squared test). The QLQ-C30 and L13 subscales showed greater improvement in the gemcitabine plus BSC arm (in 11 domains) than in the BSC arm (one symptom item). There was greater deterioration in the BSC alone arm (six domains/items) than in the gemcitabine + BSC arm (three QL domains). Tumour response occurred in 19% (95% CI 13–27) of gemcitabine patients. There was no difference in overall survival: median 5.7 months (95% CI 4.6–7.6) for gemcitabine + BSC patients and 5.9 months (95% CI 5.0–7.9) (log-rank, P = 0.84) for BSC patients, and 1-year survival was 25% for gemcitabine + BSC and 22% for BSC. Overall, 74 (49%) gemcitabine + BSC patients and 119 (79%) BSC patients received palliative radiotherapy. The median time to radiotherapy was 29 weeks for gemcitabine + BSC patients and 3.8 weeks for BSC. Patients treated with gemcitabine + BSC reported better QL and reduced disease-related symptoms compared with those receiving BSC alone. These improvements in patient-assessed QL were significant in magnitude and were sustained. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign
format Text
id pubmed-2374661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2000
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23746612009-09-10 Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer – a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome Anderson, H Hopwood, P Stephens, R J Thatcher, N Cottier, B Nicholson, M Milroy, R Maughan, T S Falk, S J Bond, M G Burt, P A Connolly, C K McIllmurray, M B Carmichael, J Br J Cancer Regular Article Three hundred patients with symptomatic, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC not requiring immediate radiotherapy were enrolled into this randomized multicentre trial comparing gemcitabine + BSC vs BSC alone. Patients allocated gemcitabine received 1000 mg/m(2)on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, for a maximum of six cycles. The main aim of this trial was to compare patient assessment of a predefined subset of commonly reported symptoms (SS14) from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 scales. The primary end-points were defined as (1) the percentage change in mean SS14 score between baseline and 2 months and (2) the proportion of patients with a marked (≥ 25%) improvement in SS14 score between baseline and 2 months sustained for ≥4 weeks. The secondary objectives were to compare treatments with respect to overall survival, and multidimensional QL parameters.The treatment groups were balanced with regard to age, gender, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and disease stage (40% had metastatic disease). The percentage change in mean SS14 score from baseline to 2 months was a 10% decrease (i.e. improvement) for gemcitabine plus BSC and a 1% increase (i.e. deterioration) for BSC alone (P = 0.113, two-sample t -test). A sustained (≥ 4 weeks) improvement (≥25%) on SS14 was recorded in a significantly higher proportion of gemcitabine + BSC patients (22%) than in BSC alone patients (9%) (P = 0.0014, Pearson’s chi-squared test). The QLQ-C30 and L13 subscales showed greater improvement in the gemcitabine plus BSC arm (in 11 domains) than in the BSC arm (one symptom item). There was greater deterioration in the BSC alone arm (six domains/items) than in the gemcitabine + BSC arm (three QL domains). Tumour response occurred in 19% (95% CI 13–27) of gemcitabine patients. There was no difference in overall survival: median 5.7 months (95% CI 4.6–7.6) for gemcitabine + BSC patients and 5.9 months (95% CI 5.0–7.9) (log-rank, P = 0.84) for BSC patients, and 1-year survival was 25% for gemcitabine + BSC and 22% for BSC. Overall, 74 (49%) gemcitabine + BSC patients and 119 (79%) BSC patients received palliative radiotherapy. The median time to radiotherapy was 29 weeks for gemcitabine + BSC patients and 3.8 weeks for BSC. Patients treated with gemcitabine + BSC reported better QL and reduced disease-related symptoms compared with those receiving BSC alone. These improvements in patient-assessed QL were significant in magnitude and were sustained. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign Nature Publishing Group 2000-07 2000-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2374661/ /pubmed/10945489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1307 Text en Copyright © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Anderson, H
Hopwood, P
Stephens, R J
Thatcher, N
Cottier, B
Nicholson, M
Milroy, R
Maughan, T S
Falk, S J
Bond, M G
Burt, P A
Connolly, C K
McIllmurray, M B
Carmichael, J
Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer – a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome
title Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer – a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome
title_full Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer – a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome
title_fullStr Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer – a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome
title_full_unstemmed Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer – a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome
title_short Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer – a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome
title_sort gemcitabine plus best supportive care (bsc) vs bsc in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer – a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10945489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1307
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonh gemcitabineplusbestsupportivecarebscvsbscininoperablenonsmallcelllungcancerarandomizedtrialwithqualityoflifeastheprimaryoutcome
AT hopwoodp gemcitabineplusbestsupportivecarebscvsbscininoperablenonsmallcelllungcancerarandomizedtrialwithqualityoflifeastheprimaryoutcome
AT stephensrj gemcitabineplusbestsupportivecarebscvsbscininoperablenonsmallcelllungcancerarandomizedtrialwithqualityoflifeastheprimaryoutcome
AT thatchern gemcitabineplusbestsupportivecarebscvsbscininoperablenonsmallcelllungcancerarandomizedtrialwithqualityoflifeastheprimaryoutcome
AT cottierb gemcitabineplusbestsupportivecarebscvsbscininoperablenonsmallcelllungcancerarandomizedtrialwithqualityoflifeastheprimaryoutcome
AT nicholsonm gemcitabineplusbestsupportivecarebscvsbscininoperablenonsmallcelllungcancerarandomizedtrialwithqualityoflifeastheprimaryoutcome
AT milroyr gemcitabineplusbestsupportivecarebscvsbscininoperablenonsmallcelllungcancerarandomizedtrialwithqualityoflifeastheprimaryoutcome
AT maughants gemcitabineplusbestsupportivecarebscvsbscininoperablenonsmallcelllungcancerarandomizedtrialwithqualityoflifeastheprimaryoutcome
AT falksj gemcitabineplusbestsupportivecarebscvsbscininoperablenonsmallcelllungcancerarandomizedtrialwithqualityoflifeastheprimaryoutcome
AT bondmg gemcitabineplusbestsupportivecarebscvsbscininoperablenonsmallcelllungcancerarandomizedtrialwithqualityoflifeastheprimaryoutcome
AT burtpa gemcitabineplusbestsupportivecarebscvsbscininoperablenonsmallcelllungcancerarandomizedtrialwithqualityoflifeastheprimaryoutcome
AT connollyck gemcitabineplusbestsupportivecarebscvsbscininoperablenonsmallcelllungcancerarandomizedtrialwithqualityoflifeastheprimaryoutcome
AT mcillmurraymb gemcitabineplusbestsupportivecarebscvsbscininoperablenonsmallcelllungcancerarandomizedtrialwithqualityoflifeastheprimaryoutcome
AT carmichaelj gemcitabineplusbestsupportivecarebscvsbscininoperablenonsmallcelllungcancerarandomizedtrialwithqualityoflifeastheprimaryoutcome