Cargando…

Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Various perinatal factors, including birth weight, birth order, maternal age, gestational age, twin status, and parental smoking, have been postulated to affect breast cancer risk in daughters by altering the hormonal environment of the developing fetal mammary glands. Despite ample bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Sue Kyung, Kang, Daehee, McGlynn, Katherine A, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, Kim, Yeonju, Yoo, Keun Young, Brinton, Louise A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18205956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr1850
_version_ 1782154546405965824
author Park, Sue Kyung
Kang, Daehee
McGlynn, Katherine A
Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
Kim, Yeonju
Yoo, Keun Young
Brinton, Louise A
author_facet Park, Sue Kyung
Kang, Daehee
McGlynn, Katherine A
Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
Kim, Yeonju
Yoo, Keun Young
Brinton, Louise A
author_sort Park, Sue Kyung
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Various perinatal factors, including birth weight, birth order, maternal age, gestational age, twin status, and parental smoking, have been postulated to affect breast cancer risk in daughters by altering the hormonal environment of the developing fetal mammary glands. Despite ample biologic plausibility, epidemiologic studies to date have yielded conflicting results. We investigated the associations between perinatal factors and subsequent breast cancer risk through meta-analyses. METHODS: We reviewed breast cancer studies published from January 1966 to February 2007 that included data on birth weight, birth order, maternal age, gestational age, twin status, and maternal or paternal smoking. Meta-analyses using random effect models were employed to summarize the results. RESULTS: We found that heavier birth weights were associated with increased breast cancer risk, with studies involving five categories of birth weight identifying odds ratios (ORs) of 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04 to 1.48) for 4,000 g or more and 1.15 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.26) for 3,500 g to 3,999 g, relative to a birth weight of 2,500 to 2,599 g. These studies provided no support for a J-shaped relationship of birthweight to risk. Support for an association with birthweight was also derived from studies based on three birth weight categories (OR 1.15 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.31] for ≥4,000 g relative to <3,000 g) and two birth weight categories (OR 1.09 [95% CI 1.02 to 1.18] for ≥3,000 g relative to <3,000 g). Women born to older mothers and twins were also at some increased risk, but the results were heterogeneous across studies and publication years. Birth order, prematurity, and maternal smoking were unrelated to breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide some support for the hypothesis that in utero exposures reflective of higher endogenous hormone levels could affect risk for development of breast cancer in adulthood.
format Text
id pubmed-2374960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23749602008-05-10 Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review Park, Sue Kyung Kang, Daehee McGlynn, Katherine A Garcia-Closas, Montserrat Kim, Yeonju Yoo, Keun Young Brinton, Louise A Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Various perinatal factors, including birth weight, birth order, maternal age, gestational age, twin status, and parental smoking, have been postulated to affect breast cancer risk in daughters by altering the hormonal environment of the developing fetal mammary glands. Despite ample biologic plausibility, epidemiologic studies to date have yielded conflicting results. We investigated the associations between perinatal factors and subsequent breast cancer risk through meta-analyses. METHODS: We reviewed breast cancer studies published from January 1966 to February 2007 that included data on birth weight, birth order, maternal age, gestational age, twin status, and maternal or paternal smoking. Meta-analyses using random effect models were employed to summarize the results. RESULTS: We found that heavier birth weights were associated with increased breast cancer risk, with studies involving five categories of birth weight identifying odds ratios (ORs) of 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04 to 1.48) for 4,000 g or more and 1.15 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.26) for 3,500 g to 3,999 g, relative to a birth weight of 2,500 to 2,599 g. These studies provided no support for a J-shaped relationship of birthweight to risk. Support for an association with birthweight was also derived from studies based on three birth weight categories (OR 1.15 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.31] for ≥4,000 g relative to <3,000 g) and two birth weight categories (OR 1.09 [95% CI 1.02 to 1.18] for ≥3,000 g relative to <3,000 g). Women born to older mothers and twins were also at some increased risk, but the results were heterogeneous across studies and publication years. Birth order, prematurity, and maternal smoking were unrelated to breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide some support for the hypothesis that in utero exposures reflective of higher endogenous hormone levels could affect risk for development of breast cancer in adulthood. BioMed Central 2008 2008-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2374960/ /pubmed/18205956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr1850 Text en Copyright © 2008 Park et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Park, Sue Kyung
Kang, Daehee
McGlynn, Katherine A
Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
Kim, Yeonju
Yoo, Keun Young
Brinton, Louise A
Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review
title Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review
title_fullStr Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review
title_short Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review
title_sort intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18205956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr1850
work_keys_str_mv AT parksuekyung intrauterineenvironmentsandbreastcancerriskmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT kangdaehee intrauterineenvironmentsandbreastcancerriskmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT mcglynnkatherinea intrauterineenvironmentsandbreastcancerriskmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT garciaclosasmontserrat intrauterineenvironmentsandbreastcancerriskmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT kimyeonju intrauterineenvironmentsandbreastcancerriskmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT yookeunyoung intrauterineenvironmentsandbreastcancerriskmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT brintonlouisea intrauterineenvironmentsandbreastcancerriskmetaanalysisandsystematicreview