Cargando…

A dose-finding study of carboplatin–epirubicin–docetaxel in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

The docetaxel–carboplatin combination is active and well tolerated in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. We added epirubicin to this combination to investigate additional benefits of anthracyclines in epithelial ovarian cancer. Twenty-one patients, FIGO Ic-IV, performance status 0–1, were trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Neill, V J, Kaye, S B, Reed, N S, Paul, J, Davis, J A, Vasey, P A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2375366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11986768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600259
Descripción
Sumario:The docetaxel–carboplatin combination is active and well tolerated in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. We added epirubicin to this combination to investigate additional benefits of anthracyclines in epithelial ovarian cancer. Twenty-one patients, FIGO Ic-IV, performance status 0–1, were treated in four dose cohorts. Docetaxel was fixed at 75 mg m(−2), carboplatin doses were AUC 4–5 and epirubicin doses were 50–60 mg m(−2). Drugs were given on day 1, every 3 weeks, except in cohort 3, where epirubicin was given on day 8. Dexamethasone was given prophylactically. One dose-limiting toxicity occurred in cohorts 1, 2 and 4, two occurred in cohort 3. Complicated neutropenia occurred in two patients in cohorts 1 and 2 and one patient in cohorts 3 and 4. Two patients experienced grade III diarrhoea or stomatitis in cohort 1 and two in cohort 3. There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade II sensory neuropathy occurred in one patient. No cardiac toxicity or significant oedema was observed. The overall response rate was 36%, and 62% were CA125 responders. The predefined maximum tolerated dose was exceeded in cohort 3. The cohort 4 dose level (epirubicin 50 mg m(−2), carboplatin AUC 4, docetaxel 75 mg m(−2)), warrants further study. British Journal of Cancer (2002) 86, 1385–1390. DOI: 10.1038/sj/bjc/6600259 www.bjcancer.com © 2002 Cancer Research UK