Cargando…
A multicentre phase II study of cisplatin and gemcitabine for malignant mesothelioma
Our previous phase II study of cisplatin and gemcitabine in malignant mesothelioma showed a 47.6% (95% CI 26.2–69.0%) response rate with symptom improvement in responding patients. Here we confirm these findings in a multicentre setting, and assess the effect of this treatment on quality of life and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2376155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12189542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600505 |
_version_ | 1782154702962556928 |
---|---|
author | Nowak, A K Byrne, M J Williamson, R Ryan, G Segal, A Fielding, D Mitchell, P Musk, A W Robinson, B W S |
author_facet | Nowak, A K Byrne, M J Williamson, R Ryan, G Segal, A Fielding, D Mitchell, P Musk, A W Robinson, B W S |
author_sort | Nowak, A K |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our previous phase II study of cisplatin and gemcitabine in malignant mesothelioma showed a 47.6% (95% CI 26.2–69.0%) response rate with symptom improvement in responding patients. Here we confirm these findings in a multicentre setting, and assess the effect of this treatment on quality of life and pulmonary function. Fifty-three patients with pleural malignant mesothelioma received cisplatin 100 mg m(−2) i.v. day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg m(−2) i.v. days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28 day cycle for a maximum of six cycles. Quality of life and pulmonary function were assessed at each cycle. The best response achieved in 52 assessable patients was: partial response, 17 (33%, 95% CI 20–46%); stable disease, 31 (60%); and progressive disease, four (8%). The median time to disease progression was 6.4 months, median survival from start of treatment 11.2 months, and median survival from diagnosis 17.3 months. Vital capacity and global quality of life remained stable in all patients and improved significantly in responding patients. Major toxicities were haematological, limiting the mean relative dose intensity of gemcitabine to 75%. This schedule of cisplatin and gemcitabine is active in malignant mesothelioma in a multicentre setting. Investigation of alternative scheduling is needed to decrease haematological toxicity and increase the relative dose intensity of gemcitabine whilst maintaining response rate and quality of life. British Journal of Cancer (2002) 87, 491–496. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600505 www.bjcancer.com © 2002 Cancer Research UK |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2376155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23761552009-09-10 A multicentre phase II study of cisplatin and gemcitabine for malignant mesothelioma Nowak, A K Byrne, M J Williamson, R Ryan, G Segal, A Fielding, D Mitchell, P Musk, A W Robinson, B W S Br J Cancer Clinical Our previous phase II study of cisplatin and gemcitabine in malignant mesothelioma showed a 47.6% (95% CI 26.2–69.0%) response rate with symptom improvement in responding patients. Here we confirm these findings in a multicentre setting, and assess the effect of this treatment on quality of life and pulmonary function. Fifty-three patients with pleural malignant mesothelioma received cisplatin 100 mg m(−2) i.v. day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg m(−2) i.v. days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28 day cycle for a maximum of six cycles. Quality of life and pulmonary function were assessed at each cycle. The best response achieved in 52 assessable patients was: partial response, 17 (33%, 95% CI 20–46%); stable disease, 31 (60%); and progressive disease, four (8%). The median time to disease progression was 6.4 months, median survival from start of treatment 11.2 months, and median survival from diagnosis 17.3 months. Vital capacity and global quality of life remained stable in all patients and improved significantly in responding patients. Major toxicities were haematological, limiting the mean relative dose intensity of gemcitabine to 75%. This schedule of cisplatin and gemcitabine is active in malignant mesothelioma in a multicentre setting. Investigation of alternative scheduling is needed to decrease haematological toxicity and increase the relative dose intensity of gemcitabine whilst maintaining response rate and quality of life. British Journal of Cancer (2002) 87, 491–496. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600505 www.bjcancer.com © 2002 Cancer Research UK Nature Publishing Group 2002-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2376155/ /pubmed/12189542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600505 Text en Copyright © 2002 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Nowak, A K Byrne, M J Williamson, R Ryan, G Segal, A Fielding, D Mitchell, P Musk, A W Robinson, B W S A multicentre phase II study of cisplatin and gemcitabine for malignant mesothelioma |
title | A multicentre phase II study of cisplatin and gemcitabine for malignant mesothelioma |
title_full | A multicentre phase II study of cisplatin and gemcitabine for malignant mesothelioma |
title_fullStr | A multicentre phase II study of cisplatin and gemcitabine for malignant mesothelioma |
title_full_unstemmed | A multicentre phase II study of cisplatin and gemcitabine for malignant mesothelioma |
title_short | A multicentre phase II study of cisplatin and gemcitabine for malignant mesothelioma |
title_sort | multicentre phase ii study of cisplatin and gemcitabine for malignant mesothelioma |
topic | Clinical |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2376155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12189542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600505 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nowakak amulticentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT byrnemj amulticentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT williamsonr amulticentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT ryang amulticentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT segala amulticentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT fieldingd amulticentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT mitchellp amulticentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT muskaw amulticentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT robinsonbws amulticentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT nowakak multicentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT byrnemj multicentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT williamsonr multicentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT ryang multicentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT segala multicentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT fieldingd multicentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT mitchellp multicentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT muskaw multicentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma AT robinsonbws multicentrephaseiistudyofcisplatinandgemcitabineformalignantmesothelioma |