Cargando…
Block sequential adriamycin CMF – optimal non-myeloablative chemotherapy for high risk adjuvant breast cancer?
After the publication of the 10-year survival data from Milan on the adjuvant use of the block sequential regimen consisting of four cycles of adriamycin followed by eight cycles of intravenous CMF, many centres adopted this as standard of care for high risk, multiple node-positive breast cancer. Fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2376297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12454763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600660 |
_version_ | 1782154720104677376 |
---|---|
author | Cameron, D A Anderson, A Toy, E Evans, T R J Le Vay, J H Kennedy, I C S Grieve, R J Perren, T J Jones, A Mansi, J Crown, J Leonard, R C F |
author_facet | Cameron, D A Anderson, A Toy, E Evans, T R J Le Vay, J H Kennedy, I C S Grieve, R J Perren, T J Jones, A Mansi, J Crown, J Leonard, R C F |
author_sort | Cameron, D A |
collection | PubMed |
description | After the publication of the 10-year survival data from Milan on the adjuvant use of the block sequential regimen consisting of four cycles of adriamycin followed by eight cycles of intravenous CMF, many centres adopted this as standard of care for high risk, multiple node-positive breast cancer. For this reason it was identified as the standard arm for the Anglo-Celtic adjuvant high-dose chemotherapy trial. This study reports on the experience of this regimen in 329 women with early breast cancer involving at least four axillary nodes, who were treated outside any adjuvant chemotherapy trial. At a median follow-up of 3 years, the overall 5-year disease-free survival is 61%, and the overall survival is 70%. These data confirm the efficacy of this regimen in non-trial patients, and, for the same high risk subgroup, indicate that this approach offers an outcome at least as good as that seen in the CALGB 9344 AC-Taxol arm, and the NCIC days 1 and 8 CEF. British Journal of Cancer (2002) 87, 1365–1369. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600660 www.bjcancer.com © 2002 Cancer Research UK |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2376297 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23762972009-09-10 Block sequential adriamycin CMF – optimal non-myeloablative chemotherapy for high risk adjuvant breast cancer? Cameron, D A Anderson, A Toy, E Evans, T R J Le Vay, J H Kennedy, I C S Grieve, R J Perren, T J Jones, A Mansi, J Crown, J Leonard, R C F Br J Cancer Clinical After the publication of the 10-year survival data from Milan on the adjuvant use of the block sequential regimen consisting of four cycles of adriamycin followed by eight cycles of intravenous CMF, many centres adopted this as standard of care for high risk, multiple node-positive breast cancer. For this reason it was identified as the standard arm for the Anglo-Celtic adjuvant high-dose chemotherapy trial. This study reports on the experience of this regimen in 329 women with early breast cancer involving at least four axillary nodes, who were treated outside any adjuvant chemotherapy trial. At a median follow-up of 3 years, the overall 5-year disease-free survival is 61%, and the overall survival is 70%. These data confirm the efficacy of this regimen in non-trial patients, and, for the same high risk subgroup, indicate that this approach offers an outcome at least as good as that seen in the CALGB 9344 AC-Taxol arm, and the NCIC days 1 and 8 CEF. British Journal of Cancer (2002) 87, 1365–1369. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600660 www.bjcancer.com © 2002 Cancer Research UK Nature Publishing Group 2002-12-02 2002-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2376297/ /pubmed/12454763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600660 Text en Copyright © 2002 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cameron, D A Anderson, A Toy, E Evans, T R J Le Vay, J H Kennedy, I C S Grieve, R J Perren, T J Jones, A Mansi, J Crown, J Leonard, R C F Block sequential adriamycin CMF – optimal non-myeloablative chemotherapy for high risk adjuvant breast cancer? |
title | Block sequential adriamycin CMF – optimal non-myeloablative chemotherapy for high risk adjuvant breast cancer? |
title_full | Block sequential adriamycin CMF – optimal non-myeloablative chemotherapy for high risk adjuvant breast cancer? |
title_fullStr | Block sequential adriamycin CMF – optimal non-myeloablative chemotherapy for high risk adjuvant breast cancer? |
title_full_unstemmed | Block sequential adriamycin CMF – optimal non-myeloablative chemotherapy for high risk adjuvant breast cancer? |
title_short | Block sequential adriamycin CMF – optimal non-myeloablative chemotherapy for high risk adjuvant breast cancer? |
title_sort | block sequential adriamycin cmf – optimal non-myeloablative chemotherapy for high risk adjuvant breast cancer? |
topic | Clinical |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2376297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12454763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cameronda blocksequentialadriamycincmfoptimalnonmyeloablativechemotherapyforhighriskadjuvantbreastcancer AT andersona blocksequentialadriamycincmfoptimalnonmyeloablativechemotherapyforhighriskadjuvantbreastcancer AT toye blocksequentialadriamycincmfoptimalnonmyeloablativechemotherapyforhighriskadjuvantbreastcancer AT evanstrj blocksequentialadriamycincmfoptimalnonmyeloablativechemotherapyforhighriskadjuvantbreastcancer AT levayjh blocksequentialadriamycincmfoptimalnonmyeloablativechemotherapyforhighriskadjuvantbreastcancer AT kennedyics blocksequentialadriamycincmfoptimalnonmyeloablativechemotherapyforhighriskadjuvantbreastcancer AT grieverj blocksequentialadriamycincmfoptimalnonmyeloablativechemotherapyforhighriskadjuvantbreastcancer AT perrentj blocksequentialadriamycincmfoptimalnonmyeloablativechemotherapyforhighriskadjuvantbreastcancer AT jonesa blocksequentialadriamycincmfoptimalnonmyeloablativechemotherapyforhighriskadjuvantbreastcancer AT mansij blocksequentialadriamycincmfoptimalnonmyeloablativechemotherapyforhighriskadjuvantbreastcancer AT crownj blocksequentialadriamycincmfoptimalnonmyeloablativechemotherapyforhighriskadjuvantbreastcancer AT leonardrcf blocksequentialadriamycincmfoptimalnonmyeloablativechemotherapyforhighriskadjuvantbreastcancer |