Cargando…

Geographical inequalities in lung cancer management and survival in South East England: evidence of variation in access to oncology services?

This study aimed to determine whether the management and survival of patients with lung cancer varied among 26 health authorities in South East England. The Thames Cancer Registry identified patients diagnosed with lung cancer (ICD-10 codes C33–C34) between 1995 and 1999. After excluding death certi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jack, R H, Gulliford, M C, Ferguson, J, Møller, H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2376363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12671698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600831
_version_ 1782154729119285248
author Jack, R H
Gulliford, M C
Ferguson, J
Møller, H
author_facet Jack, R H
Gulliford, M C
Ferguson, J
Møller, H
author_sort Jack, R H
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to determine whether the management and survival of patients with lung cancer varied among 26 health authorities in South East England. The Thames Cancer Registry identified patients diagnosed with lung cancer (ICD-10 codes C33–C34) between 1995 and 1999. After excluding death certificate only patients, 32 818 (81%) patients were analysed. The proportions of patients receiving active treatment varied among health authorities between 5 and 17% for non-investigative surgery, 4 and 17% for any chemotherapy, 8 and 30% for any radiotherapy and 15 and 42% for any active treatment. One-year patient survival ranged from 11 to 34%. There was evidence of health authority level variation even after adjusting for case mix. Patients whose first hospital attendance was at a radiotherapy centre were more likely to receive active treatment (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.21–2.46), chemotherapy (1.38, 1.06–1.79) or radiotherapy (1.86, 1.28–2.71). There was some evidence that patients whose first hospital attendance was at a radiotherapy centre survived longer. This study shows there is geographical inequality in the treatment given to lung cancer patients and patient survival in South East England. There was some evidence to suggest that these inequalities might be explained by variations in access to oncology services. Future studies should investigate the pathways and barriers to specialist care in this condition.
format Text
id pubmed-2376363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23763632009-09-10 Geographical inequalities in lung cancer management and survival in South East England: evidence of variation in access to oncology services? Jack, R H Gulliford, M C Ferguson, J Møller, H Br J Cancer Clinical This study aimed to determine whether the management and survival of patients with lung cancer varied among 26 health authorities in South East England. The Thames Cancer Registry identified patients diagnosed with lung cancer (ICD-10 codes C33–C34) between 1995 and 1999. After excluding death certificate only patients, 32 818 (81%) patients were analysed. The proportions of patients receiving active treatment varied among health authorities between 5 and 17% for non-investigative surgery, 4 and 17% for any chemotherapy, 8 and 30% for any radiotherapy and 15 and 42% for any active treatment. One-year patient survival ranged from 11 to 34%. There was evidence of health authority level variation even after adjusting for case mix. Patients whose first hospital attendance was at a radiotherapy centre were more likely to receive active treatment (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.21–2.46), chemotherapy (1.38, 1.06–1.79) or radiotherapy (1.86, 1.28–2.71). There was some evidence that patients whose first hospital attendance was at a radiotherapy centre survived longer. This study shows there is geographical inequality in the treatment given to lung cancer patients and patient survival in South East England. There was some evidence to suggest that these inequalities might be explained by variations in access to oncology services. Future studies should investigate the pathways and barriers to specialist care in this condition. Nature Publishing Group 2003-04-07 2003-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2376363/ /pubmed/12671698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600831 Text en Copyright © 2003 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical
Jack, R H
Gulliford, M C
Ferguson, J
Møller, H
Geographical inequalities in lung cancer management and survival in South East England: evidence of variation in access to oncology services?
title Geographical inequalities in lung cancer management and survival in South East England: evidence of variation in access to oncology services?
title_full Geographical inequalities in lung cancer management and survival in South East England: evidence of variation in access to oncology services?
title_fullStr Geographical inequalities in lung cancer management and survival in South East England: evidence of variation in access to oncology services?
title_full_unstemmed Geographical inequalities in lung cancer management and survival in South East England: evidence of variation in access to oncology services?
title_short Geographical inequalities in lung cancer management and survival in South East England: evidence of variation in access to oncology services?
title_sort geographical inequalities in lung cancer management and survival in south east england: evidence of variation in access to oncology services?
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2376363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12671698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600831
work_keys_str_mv AT jackrh geographicalinequalitiesinlungcancermanagementandsurvivalinsoutheastenglandevidenceofvariationinaccesstooncologyservices
AT gullifordmc geographicalinequalitiesinlungcancermanagementandsurvivalinsoutheastenglandevidenceofvariationinaccesstooncologyservices
AT fergusonj geographicalinequalitiesinlungcancermanagementandsurvivalinsoutheastenglandevidenceofvariationinaccesstooncologyservices
AT møllerh geographicalinequalitiesinlungcancermanagementandsurvivalinsoutheastenglandevidenceofvariationinaccesstooncologyservices