Cargando…

External validity of a prediction rule for residual mass histology in testicular cancer: an evaluation for good prognosis patients

We assessed the external validity of a prediction rule for nonseminomatous testicular cancer patients. The rule was developed to predict the probability of retroperitoneal metastases being benign (only necrosis/fibrosis) after chemotherapy treatment. Patients with a high probability of benign residu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vergouwe, Y, Steyerberg, E W, de Wit, R, Roberts, J T, Keizer, H J, Collette, L, Stenning, S P, Habbema, J D F
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2377085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12644820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600759
_version_ 1782154773871460352
author Vergouwe, Y
Steyerberg, E W
de Wit, R
Roberts, J T
Keizer, H J
Collette, L
Stenning, S P
Habbema, J D F
author_facet Vergouwe, Y
Steyerberg, E W
de Wit, R
Roberts, J T
Keizer, H J
Collette, L
Stenning, S P
Habbema, J D F
author_sort Vergouwe, Y
collection PubMed
description We assessed the external validity of a prediction rule for nonseminomatous testicular cancer patients. The rule was developed to predict the probability of retroperitoneal metastases being benign (only necrosis/fibrosis) after chemotherapy treatment. Patients with a high probability of benign residual masses might be offered surveillance as opposed to patients with a low probability, who should undergo retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). We compared the observed histology with the predicted probability in 105 patients with good prognosis germ cell cancer who underwent RPLND between 1995 and 1998. We found that predicted probabilities higher than 5% were in good agreement with the observed frequencies of benign masses. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.76, suggesting that the rule could reasonably discriminate between benign masses and tumour. However, nearly all predicted probabilities (n=101) were lower than 70%, which might be considered as the lowest value at which surveillance offers a reasonable alternative to RPLND. Further, 35% of patients currently under surveillance (84 out of 241) had predicted probabilities lower than 70%. In conclusion, the clinical relevance of the prediction rule was limited for the patients who underwent RPLND; use of the rule would change the policy from RPLND to surveillance in only a few. On the other hand, the rule might support selection of patients for RPLND, who currently are under surveillance.
format Text
id pubmed-2377085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23770852009-09-10 External validity of a prediction rule for residual mass histology in testicular cancer: an evaluation for good prognosis patients Vergouwe, Y Steyerberg, E W de Wit, R Roberts, J T Keizer, H J Collette, L Stenning, S P Habbema, J D F Br J Cancer Molecular and Cellular Pathology We assessed the external validity of a prediction rule for nonseminomatous testicular cancer patients. The rule was developed to predict the probability of retroperitoneal metastases being benign (only necrosis/fibrosis) after chemotherapy treatment. Patients with a high probability of benign residual masses might be offered surveillance as opposed to patients with a low probability, who should undergo retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). We compared the observed histology with the predicted probability in 105 patients with good prognosis germ cell cancer who underwent RPLND between 1995 and 1998. We found that predicted probabilities higher than 5% were in good agreement with the observed frequencies of benign masses. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.76, suggesting that the rule could reasonably discriminate between benign masses and tumour. However, nearly all predicted probabilities (n=101) were lower than 70%, which might be considered as the lowest value at which surveillance offers a reasonable alternative to RPLND. Further, 35% of patients currently under surveillance (84 out of 241) had predicted probabilities lower than 70%. In conclusion, the clinical relevance of the prediction rule was limited for the patients who underwent RPLND; use of the rule would change the policy from RPLND to surveillance in only a few. On the other hand, the rule might support selection of patients for RPLND, who currently are under surveillance. Nature Publishing Group 2003-03-24 2003-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2377085/ /pubmed/12644820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600759 Text en Copyright © 2003 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Molecular and Cellular Pathology
Vergouwe, Y
Steyerberg, E W
de Wit, R
Roberts, J T
Keizer, H J
Collette, L
Stenning, S P
Habbema, J D F
External validity of a prediction rule for residual mass histology in testicular cancer: an evaluation for good prognosis patients
title External validity of a prediction rule for residual mass histology in testicular cancer: an evaluation for good prognosis patients
title_full External validity of a prediction rule for residual mass histology in testicular cancer: an evaluation for good prognosis patients
title_fullStr External validity of a prediction rule for residual mass histology in testicular cancer: an evaluation for good prognosis patients
title_full_unstemmed External validity of a prediction rule for residual mass histology in testicular cancer: an evaluation for good prognosis patients
title_short External validity of a prediction rule for residual mass histology in testicular cancer: an evaluation for good prognosis patients
title_sort external validity of a prediction rule for residual mass histology in testicular cancer: an evaluation for good prognosis patients
topic Molecular and Cellular Pathology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2377085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12644820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600759
work_keys_str_mv AT vergouwey externalvalidityofapredictionruleforresidualmasshistologyintesticularcanceranevaluationforgoodprognosispatients
AT steyerbergew externalvalidityofapredictionruleforresidualmasshistologyintesticularcanceranevaluationforgoodprognosispatients
AT dewitr externalvalidityofapredictionruleforresidualmasshistologyintesticularcanceranevaluationforgoodprognosispatients
AT robertsjt externalvalidityofapredictionruleforresidualmasshistologyintesticularcanceranevaluationforgoodprognosispatients
AT keizerhj externalvalidityofapredictionruleforresidualmasshistologyintesticularcanceranevaluationforgoodprognosispatients
AT collettel externalvalidityofapredictionruleforresidualmasshistologyintesticularcanceranevaluationforgoodprognosispatients
AT stenningsp externalvalidityofapredictionruleforresidualmasshistologyintesticularcanceranevaluationforgoodprognosispatients
AT habbemajdf externalvalidityofapredictionruleforresidualmasshistologyintesticularcanceranevaluationforgoodprognosispatients