Cargando…
Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer
The factors affecting long-term survival following oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer are poorly understood. We examined the significance of microscopic tumour involvement at the circumferential resection margin (CRM) on postoperative survival following oesophagectomy. The case notes of 329 patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2377103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12771920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600931 |
_version_ | 1782154778152796160 |
---|---|
author | Khan, O A Fitzgerald, J J Soomro, I Beggs, F D Morgan, W E Duffy, J P |
author_facet | Khan, O A Fitzgerald, J J Soomro, I Beggs, F D Morgan, W E Duffy, J P |
author_sort | Khan, O A |
collection | PubMed |
description | The factors affecting long-term survival following oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer are poorly understood. We examined the significance of microscopic tumour involvement at the circumferential resection margin (CRM) on postoperative survival following oesophagectomy. The case notes of 329 patients who underwent a potentially curative oesophagectomy for squamous or adenocarcinoma were reviewed retrospectively. As part of the procedure, all patients underwent an en-bloc resection of their perioesophageal tissue. The presence of tumour either at, or within, 1 mm of the CRM was recorded and correlated with their TNM and survival data. A total of 67 patients (20%) were noted to have a positive CRM, of which 40 cases (12%) had tumour at the resection margin and the remainder had tumour within 1 mm of the margin. Univariate analysis showed no statistically significant association between survival and either category of CRM involvement. Multivariate analysis showed that only T-stage, nodal status and tumour grade were prognostic markers. In conclusion, the presence of microscopic tumour at the CRM following an en-bloc oesophagectomy is not a significant prognostic marker. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2377103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23771032009-09-10 Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer Khan, O A Fitzgerald, J J Soomro, I Beggs, F D Morgan, W E Duffy, J P Br J Cancer Molecular and Cellular Pathology The factors affecting long-term survival following oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer are poorly understood. We examined the significance of microscopic tumour involvement at the circumferential resection margin (CRM) on postoperative survival following oesophagectomy. The case notes of 329 patients who underwent a potentially curative oesophagectomy for squamous or adenocarcinoma were reviewed retrospectively. As part of the procedure, all patients underwent an en-bloc resection of their perioesophageal tissue. The presence of tumour either at, or within, 1 mm of the CRM was recorded and correlated with their TNM and survival data. A total of 67 patients (20%) were noted to have a positive CRM, of which 40 cases (12%) had tumour at the resection margin and the remainder had tumour within 1 mm of the margin. Univariate analysis showed no statistically significant association between survival and either category of CRM involvement. Multivariate analysis showed that only T-stage, nodal status and tumour grade were prognostic markers. In conclusion, the presence of microscopic tumour at the CRM following an en-bloc oesophagectomy is not a significant prognostic marker. Nature Publishing Group 2003-05-19 2003-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2377103/ /pubmed/12771920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600931 Text en Copyright © 2003 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Molecular and Cellular Pathology Khan, O A Fitzgerald, J J Soomro, I Beggs, F D Morgan, W E Duffy, J P Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer |
title | Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer |
title_full | Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer |
title_fullStr | Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer |
title_short | Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer |
title_sort | prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer |
topic | Molecular and Cellular Pathology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2377103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12771920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600931 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khanoa prognosticsignificanceofcircumferentialresectionmargininvolvementfollowingoesophagectomyforcancer AT fitzgeraldjj prognosticsignificanceofcircumferentialresectionmargininvolvementfollowingoesophagectomyforcancer AT soomroi prognosticsignificanceofcircumferentialresectionmargininvolvementfollowingoesophagectomyforcancer AT beggsfd prognosticsignificanceofcircumferentialresectionmargininvolvementfollowingoesophagectomyforcancer AT morganwe prognosticsignificanceofcircumferentialresectionmargininvolvementfollowingoesophagectomyforcancer AT duffyjp prognosticsignificanceofcircumferentialresectionmargininvolvementfollowingoesophagectomyforcancer |