Cargando…

Binning sequences using very sparse labels within a metagenome

BACKGROUND: In metagenomic studies, a process called binning is necessary to assign contigs that belong to multiple species to their respective phylogenetic groups. Most of the current methods of binning, such as BLAST, k-mer and PhyloPythia, involve assigning sequence fragments by comparing sequenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Chon-Kit Kenneth, Hsu, Arthur L, Halgamuge, Saman K, Tang, Sen-Lin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2383919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18442374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-215
_version_ 1782154834398412800
author Chan, Chon-Kit Kenneth
Hsu, Arthur L
Halgamuge, Saman K
Tang, Sen-Lin
author_facet Chan, Chon-Kit Kenneth
Hsu, Arthur L
Halgamuge, Saman K
Tang, Sen-Lin
author_sort Chan, Chon-Kit Kenneth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In metagenomic studies, a process called binning is necessary to assign contigs that belong to multiple species to their respective phylogenetic groups. Most of the current methods of binning, such as BLAST, k-mer and PhyloPythia, involve assigning sequence fragments by comparing sequence similarity or sequence composition with already-sequenced genomes that are still far from comprehensive. We propose a semi-supervised seeding method for binning that does not depend on knowledge of completed genomes. Instead, it extracts the flanking sequences of highly conserved 16S rRNA from the metagenome and uses them as seeds (labels) to assign other reads based on their compositional similarity. RESULTS: The proposed seeding method is implemented on an unsupervised Growing Self-Organising Map (GSOM), and called Seeded GSOM (S-GSOM). We compared it with four well-known semi-supervised learning methods in a preliminary test, separating random-length prokaryotic sequence fragments sampled from the NCBI genome database. We identified the flanking sequences of the highly conserved 16S rRNA as suitable seeds that could be used to group the sequence fragments according to their species. S-GSOM showed superior performance compared to the semi-supervised methods tested. Additionally, S-GSOM may also be used to visually identify some species that do not have seeds. The proposed method was then applied to simulated metagenomic datasets using two different confidence threshold settings and compared with PhyloPythia, k-mer and BLAST. At the reference taxonomic level Order, S-GSOM outperformed all k-mer and BLAST results and showed comparable results with PhyloPythia for each of the corresponding confidence settings, where S-GSOM performed better than PhyloPythia in the ≥ 10 reads datasets and comparable in the ≥ 8 kb benchmark tests. CONCLUSION: In the task of binning using semi-supervised learning methods, results indicate S-GSOM to be the best of the methods tested. Most importantly, the proposed method does not require knowledge from known genomes and uses only very few labels (one per species is sufficient in most cases), which are extracted from the metagenome itself. These advantages make it a very attractive binning method. S-GSOM outperformed the binning methods that depend on already-sequenced genomes, and compares well to the current most advanced binning method, PhyloPythia.
format Text
id pubmed-2383919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23839192008-05-14 Binning sequences using very sparse labels within a metagenome Chan, Chon-Kit Kenneth Hsu, Arthur L Halgamuge, Saman K Tang, Sen-Lin BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: In metagenomic studies, a process called binning is necessary to assign contigs that belong to multiple species to their respective phylogenetic groups. Most of the current methods of binning, such as BLAST, k-mer and PhyloPythia, involve assigning sequence fragments by comparing sequence similarity or sequence composition with already-sequenced genomes that are still far from comprehensive. We propose a semi-supervised seeding method for binning that does not depend on knowledge of completed genomes. Instead, it extracts the flanking sequences of highly conserved 16S rRNA from the metagenome and uses them as seeds (labels) to assign other reads based on their compositional similarity. RESULTS: The proposed seeding method is implemented on an unsupervised Growing Self-Organising Map (GSOM), and called Seeded GSOM (S-GSOM). We compared it with four well-known semi-supervised learning methods in a preliminary test, separating random-length prokaryotic sequence fragments sampled from the NCBI genome database. We identified the flanking sequences of the highly conserved 16S rRNA as suitable seeds that could be used to group the sequence fragments according to their species. S-GSOM showed superior performance compared to the semi-supervised methods tested. Additionally, S-GSOM may also be used to visually identify some species that do not have seeds. The proposed method was then applied to simulated metagenomic datasets using two different confidence threshold settings and compared with PhyloPythia, k-mer and BLAST. At the reference taxonomic level Order, S-GSOM outperformed all k-mer and BLAST results and showed comparable results with PhyloPythia for each of the corresponding confidence settings, where S-GSOM performed better than PhyloPythia in the ≥ 10 reads datasets and comparable in the ≥ 8 kb benchmark tests. CONCLUSION: In the task of binning using semi-supervised learning methods, results indicate S-GSOM to be the best of the methods tested. Most importantly, the proposed method does not require knowledge from known genomes and uses only very few labels (one per species is sufficient in most cases), which are extracted from the metagenome itself. These advantages make it a very attractive binning method. S-GSOM outperformed the binning methods that depend on already-sequenced genomes, and compares well to the current most advanced binning method, PhyloPythia. BioMed Central 2008-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2383919/ /pubmed/18442374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-215 Text en Copyright © 2008 Chan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Chan, Chon-Kit Kenneth
Hsu, Arthur L
Halgamuge, Saman K
Tang, Sen-Lin
Binning sequences using very sparse labels within a metagenome
title Binning sequences using very sparse labels within a metagenome
title_full Binning sequences using very sparse labels within a metagenome
title_fullStr Binning sequences using very sparse labels within a metagenome
title_full_unstemmed Binning sequences using very sparse labels within a metagenome
title_short Binning sequences using very sparse labels within a metagenome
title_sort binning sequences using very sparse labels within a metagenome
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2383919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18442374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-215
work_keys_str_mv AT chanchonkitkenneth binningsequencesusingverysparselabelswithinametagenome
AT hsuarthurl binningsequencesusingverysparselabelswithinametagenome
AT halgamugesamank binningsequencesusingverysparselabelswithinametagenome
AT tangsenlin binningsequencesusingverysparselabelswithinametagenome