Cargando…

Copal Bone Cement Is More Effective in Preventing Biofilm Formation than Palacos R-G

Bone cements loaded with combinations of antibiotics are assumed more effective in preventing infection than bone cements with gentamicin as a single drug. Moreover, loading with an additional antibiotic may increase interconnectivity between antibiotic particles to enhance release. We hypothesize a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ensing, Geert T., van Horn, Jim R., van der Mei, Henny C., Busscher, Henk J., Neut, Daniëlle
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2384043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18338216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0203-x
_version_ 1782154839114907648
author Ensing, Geert T.
van Horn, Jim R.
van der Mei, Henny C.
Busscher, Henk J.
Neut, Daniëlle
author_facet Ensing, Geert T.
van Horn, Jim R.
van der Mei, Henny C.
Busscher, Henk J.
Neut, Daniëlle
author_sort Ensing, Geert T.
collection PubMed
description Bone cements loaded with combinations of antibiotics are assumed more effective in preventing infection than bone cements with gentamicin as a single drug. Moreover, loading with an additional antibiotic may increase interconnectivity between antibiotic particles to enhance release. We hypothesize addition of clindamycin to a gentamicin-loaded cement yields higher antibiotic release and causes larger inhibition zones against clinical isolates grown on agar and stronger biofilm inhibition. Antibiotic release after 672 hours from Copal bone cement was more extensive (65% of the clindamycin and 41% of the gentamicin incorporated) than from Palacos R-G (4% of the gentamicin incorporated). The higher antibiotic release from Copal resulted in a stronger and more prolonged inhibition of bacterial growth on agar. Bacterial colony counting and confocal laser scanning microscopy of biofilms grown on the bone cements suggest antibiotic release reduced bacterial viability, most notably close to the cement surface. The gentamicin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus formed gentamicin-resistant small colony variants on Palacos R-G and therefore Copal more effectively decreased biofilm formation than Palacos R-G.
format Text
id pubmed-2384043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23840432009-01-15 Copal Bone Cement Is More Effective in Preventing Biofilm Formation than Palacos R-G Ensing, Geert T. van Horn, Jim R. van der Mei, Henny C. Busscher, Henk J. Neut, Daniëlle Clin Orthop Relat Res Original Article Bone cements loaded with combinations of antibiotics are assumed more effective in preventing infection than bone cements with gentamicin as a single drug. Moreover, loading with an additional antibiotic may increase interconnectivity between antibiotic particles to enhance release. We hypothesize addition of clindamycin to a gentamicin-loaded cement yields higher antibiotic release and causes larger inhibition zones against clinical isolates grown on agar and stronger biofilm inhibition. Antibiotic release after 672 hours from Copal bone cement was more extensive (65% of the clindamycin and 41% of the gentamicin incorporated) than from Palacos R-G (4% of the gentamicin incorporated). The higher antibiotic release from Copal resulted in a stronger and more prolonged inhibition of bacterial growth on agar. Bacterial colony counting and confocal laser scanning microscopy of biofilms grown on the bone cements suggest antibiotic release reduced bacterial viability, most notably close to the cement surface. The gentamicin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus formed gentamicin-resistant small colony variants on Palacos R-G and therefore Copal more effectively decreased biofilm formation than Palacos R-G. Springer-Verlag 2008-03-13 2008-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2384043/ /pubmed/18338216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0203-x Text en © The Author(s) 2008 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ensing, Geert T.
van Horn, Jim R.
van der Mei, Henny C.
Busscher, Henk J.
Neut, Daniëlle
Copal Bone Cement Is More Effective in Preventing Biofilm Formation than Palacos R-G
title Copal Bone Cement Is More Effective in Preventing Biofilm Formation than Palacos R-G
title_full Copal Bone Cement Is More Effective in Preventing Biofilm Formation than Palacos R-G
title_fullStr Copal Bone Cement Is More Effective in Preventing Biofilm Formation than Palacos R-G
title_full_unstemmed Copal Bone Cement Is More Effective in Preventing Biofilm Formation than Palacos R-G
title_short Copal Bone Cement Is More Effective in Preventing Biofilm Formation than Palacos R-G
title_sort copal bone cement is more effective in preventing biofilm formation than palacos r-g
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2384043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18338216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0203-x
work_keys_str_mv AT ensinggeertt copalbonecementismoreeffectiveinpreventingbiofilmformationthanpalacosrg
AT vanhornjimr copalbonecementismoreeffectiveinpreventingbiofilmformationthanpalacosrg
AT vandermeihennyc copalbonecementismoreeffectiveinpreventingbiofilmformationthanpalacosrg
AT busscherhenkj copalbonecementismoreeffectiveinpreventingbiofilmformationthanpalacosrg
AT neutdanielle copalbonecementismoreeffectiveinpreventingbiofilmformationthanpalacosrg