Cargando…
Brain Networks for Integrative Rhythm Formation
BACKGROUND: Performance of externally paced rhythmic movements requires brain and behavioral integration of sensory stimuli with motor commands. The underlying brain mechanisms to elaborate beat-synchronized rhythm and polyrhythms that musicians readily perform may differ. Given known roles in perce...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2386151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18509462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002312 |
_version_ | 1782155219992313856 |
---|---|
author | Thaut, Michael H. Demartin, Martina Sanes, Jerome N. |
author_facet | Thaut, Michael H. Demartin, Martina Sanes, Jerome N. |
author_sort | Thaut, Michael H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Performance of externally paced rhythmic movements requires brain and behavioral integration of sensory stimuli with motor commands. The underlying brain mechanisms to elaborate beat-synchronized rhythm and polyrhythms that musicians readily perform may differ. Given known roles in perceiving time and repetitive movements, we hypothesized that basal ganglia and cerebellar structures would have greater activation for polyrhythms than for on-the-beat rhythms. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using functional MRI methods, we investigated brain networks for performing rhythmic movements paced by auditory cues. Musically trained participants performed rhythmic movements at 2 and 3 Hz either at a 1∶1 on-the-beat or with a 3∶2 or a 2∶3 stimulus-movement structure. Due to their prior musical experience, participants performed the 3∶2 or 2∶3 rhythmic movements automatically. Both the isorhythmic 1∶1 and the polyrhythmic 3∶2 or 2∶3 movements yielded the expected activation in contralateral primary motor cortex and related motor areas and ipsilateral cerebellum. Direct comparison of functional MRI signals obtained during 3∶2 or 2∶3 and on-the-beat rhythms indicated activation differences bilaterally in the supplementary motor area, ipsilaterally in the supramarginal gyrus and caudate-putamen and contralaterally in the cerebellum. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The activated brain areas suggest the existence of an interconnected brain network specific for complex sensory-motor rhythmic integration that might have specificity for elaboration of musical abilities. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2386151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23861512008-05-28 Brain Networks for Integrative Rhythm Formation Thaut, Michael H. Demartin, Martina Sanes, Jerome N. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Performance of externally paced rhythmic movements requires brain and behavioral integration of sensory stimuli with motor commands. The underlying brain mechanisms to elaborate beat-synchronized rhythm and polyrhythms that musicians readily perform may differ. Given known roles in perceiving time and repetitive movements, we hypothesized that basal ganglia and cerebellar structures would have greater activation for polyrhythms than for on-the-beat rhythms. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using functional MRI methods, we investigated brain networks for performing rhythmic movements paced by auditory cues. Musically trained participants performed rhythmic movements at 2 and 3 Hz either at a 1∶1 on-the-beat or with a 3∶2 or a 2∶3 stimulus-movement structure. Due to their prior musical experience, participants performed the 3∶2 or 2∶3 rhythmic movements automatically. Both the isorhythmic 1∶1 and the polyrhythmic 3∶2 or 2∶3 movements yielded the expected activation in contralateral primary motor cortex and related motor areas and ipsilateral cerebellum. Direct comparison of functional MRI signals obtained during 3∶2 or 2∶3 and on-the-beat rhythms indicated activation differences bilaterally in the supplementary motor area, ipsilaterally in the supramarginal gyrus and caudate-putamen and contralaterally in the cerebellum. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The activated brain areas suggest the existence of an interconnected brain network specific for complex sensory-motor rhythmic integration that might have specificity for elaboration of musical abilities. Public Library of Science 2008-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2386151/ /pubmed/18509462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002312 Text en Thaut et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Thaut, Michael H. Demartin, Martina Sanes, Jerome N. Brain Networks for Integrative Rhythm Formation |
title | Brain Networks for Integrative Rhythm Formation |
title_full | Brain Networks for Integrative Rhythm Formation |
title_fullStr | Brain Networks for Integrative Rhythm Formation |
title_full_unstemmed | Brain Networks for Integrative Rhythm Formation |
title_short | Brain Networks for Integrative Rhythm Formation |
title_sort | brain networks for integrative rhythm formation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2386151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18509462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thautmichaelh brainnetworksforintegrativerhythmformation AT demartinmartina brainnetworksforintegrativerhythmformation AT sanesjeromen brainnetworksforintegrativerhythmformation |