Cargando…

Epiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwater

BACKGROUND: Plants and their heterotrophic bacterial biofilm communities possibly strongly interact, especially in aquatic systems. We aimed to ascertain whether different macrophytes or their habitats determine bacterial community composition. We compared the composition of epiphytic bacteria on tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hempel, Melanie, Blume, Maja, Blindow, Irmgard, Gross, Elisabeth M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2386815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18402668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-58
_version_ 1782155269453643776
author Hempel, Melanie
Blume, Maja
Blindow, Irmgard
Gross, Elisabeth M
author_facet Hempel, Melanie
Blume, Maja
Blindow, Irmgard
Gross, Elisabeth M
author_sort Hempel, Melanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Plants and their heterotrophic bacterial biofilm communities possibly strongly interact, especially in aquatic systems. We aimed to ascertain whether different macrophytes or their habitats determine bacterial community composition. We compared the composition of epiphytic bacteria on two common aquatic macrophytes, the macroalga Chara aspera Willd. and the angiosperm Myriophyllum spicatum L., in two habitats, freshwater (Lake Constance) and brackish water (Schaproder Bodden), using fluorescence in situ hybridization. The bacterial community composition was analysed based on habitat, plant species, and plant part. RESULTS: The bacterial abundance was higher on plants from brackish water [5.3 × 10(7 )cells (g dry mass)(-1)] than on plants from freshwater [1.3 × 10(7 )cells (g dry mass)(-1)], with older shoots having a higher abundance. The organic content of freshwater plants was lower than that of brackish water plants (35 vs. 58%), and lower in C. aspera than in M. spicatum (41 vs. 52%). The content of nutrients, chlorophyll, total phenolic compounds, and anthocyanin differed in the plants and habitats. Especially the content of total phenolic compounds and anthocyanin was higher in M. spicatum, and in general higher in the freshwater than in the brackish water habitat. Members of the Cytophaga-Flavobacteria-Bacteroidetes group were abundant in all samples (5–35% of the total cell counts) and were especially dominant in M. spicatum samples. Alphaproteobacteria were the second major group (3–17% of the total cell counts). Betaproteobacteria, gammaproteobacteria, and actinomycetes were present in all samples (5 or 10% of the total cell counts). Planctomycetes were almost absent on M. spicatum in freshwater, but present on C. aspera in freshwater and on both plants in brackish water. CONCLUSION: Bacterial biofilm communities on the surface of aquatic plants might be influenced by the host plant and environmental factors. Distinct plant species, plant part and habitat specific differences in total cell counts and two bacterial groups (CFB, planctomycetes) support the combined impact of substrate (plant) and habitat on epiphytic bacterial community composition. The presence of polyphenols might explain the distinct bacterial community on freshwater M. spicatum compared to that of M. spicatum in brackish water and of C. aspera in both habitats.
format Text
id pubmed-2386815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23868152008-05-17 Epiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwater Hempel, Melanie Blume, Maja Blindow, Irmgard Gross, Elisabeth M BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Plants and their heterotrophic bacterial biofilm communities possibly strongly interact, especially in aquatic systems. We aimed to ascertain whether different macrophytes or their habitats determine bacterial community composition. We compared the composition of epiphytic bacteria on two common aquatic macrophytes, the macroalga Chara aspera Willd. and the angiosperm Myriophyllum spicatum L., in two habitats, freshwater (Lake Constance) and brackish water (Schaproder Bodden), using fluorescence in situ hybridization. The bacterial community composition was analysed based on habitat, plant species, and plant part. RESULTS: The bacterial abundance was higher on plants from brackish water [5.3 × 10(7 )cells (g dry mass)(-1)] than on plants from freshwater [1.3 × 10(7 )cells (g dry mass)(-1)], with older shoots having a higher abundance. The organic content of freshwater plants was lower than that of brackish water plants (35 vs. 58%), and lower in C. aspera than in M. spicatum (41 vs. 52%). The content of nutrients, chlorophyll, total phenolic compounds, and anthocyanin differed in the plants and habitats. Especially the content of total phenolic compounds and anthocyanin was higher in M. spicatum, and in general higher in the freshwater than in the brackish water habitat. Members of the Cytophaga-Flavobacteria-Bacteroidetes group were abundant in all samples (5–35% of the total cell counts) and were especially dominant in M. spicatum samples. Alphaproteobacteria were the second major group (3–17% of the total cell counts). Betaproteobacteria, gammaproteobacteria, and actinomycetes were present in all samples (5 or 10% of the total cell counts). Planctomycetes were almost absent on M. spicatum in freshwater, but present on C. aspera in freshwater and on both plants in brackish water. CONCLUSION: Bacterial biofilm communities on the surface of aquatic plants might be influenced by the host plant and environmental factors. Distinct plant species, plant part and habitat specific differences in total cell counts and two bacterial groups (CFB, planctomycetes) support the combined impact of substrate (plant) and habitat on epiphytic bacterial community composition. The presence of polyphenols might explain the distinct bacterial community on freshwater M. spicatum compared to that of M. spicatum in brackish water and of C. aspera in both habitats. BioMed Central 2008-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2386815/ /pubmed/18402668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-58 Text en Copyright © 2008 Hempel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hempel, Melanie
Blume, Maja
Blindow, Irmgard
Gross, Elisabeth M
Epiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwater
title Epiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwater
title_full Epiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwater
title_fullStr Epiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwater
title_full_unstemmed Epiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwater
title_short Epiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwater
title_sort epiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwater
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2386815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18402668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-58
work_keys_str_mv AT hempelmelanie epiphyticbacterialcommunitycompositionontwocommonsubmergedmacrophytesinbrackishwaterandfreshwater
AT blumemaja epiphyticbacterialcommunitycompositionontwocommonsubmergedmacrophytesinbrackishwaterandfreshwater
AT blindowirmgard epiphyticbacterialcommunitycompositionontwocommonsubmergedmacrophytesinbrackishwaterandfreshwater
AT grosselisabethm epiphyticbacterialcommunitycompositionontwocommonsubmergedmacrophytesinbrackishwaterandfreshwater