Cargando…

The Reflux Disease Questionnaire: a measure for assessment of treatment response in clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Critical needs for treatment trials in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) include assessing response to treatment, evaluating symptom severity, and translation of symptom questionnaires into multiple languages. We evaluated the previously validated Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaw, Michael, Dent, John, Beebe, Timothy, Junghard, Ola, Wiklund, Ingela, Lind, Tore, Johnsson, Folke
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2390523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18447946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-31
_version_ 1782155314491031552
author Shaw, Michael
Dent, John
Beebe, Timothy
Junghard, Ola
Wiklund, Ingela
Lind, Tore
Johnsson, Folke
author_facet Shaw, Michael
Dent, John
Beebe, Timothy
Junghard, Ola
Wiklund, Ingela
Lind, Tore
Johnsson, Folke
author_sort Shaw, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Critical needs for treatment trials in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) include assessing response to treatment, evaluating symptom severity, and translation of symptom questionnaires into multiple languages. We evaluated the previously validated Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) for internal consistency, reliability, responsiveness to change during treatment and the concordance between RDQ and specialty physician assessment of symptom severity, after translation into Swedish and Norwegian. METHODS: Performance of the RDQ after translation into Swedish and Norwegian was evaluated in 439 patients with presumed GERD in a randomized, double-blind trial of active treatment with a proton pump inhibitor. RESULTS: The responsiveness was excellent across three RDQ indicators. Mean change scores in patients on active treatment were large, also reflected in effect sizes that ranged from a low of 1.05 (dyspepsia) to a high of 2.05 (heartburn) and standardized response means 0.99 (dyspepsia) and 1.52 (heartburn). A good positive correlation between physician severity ratings and RDQ scale scores was seen. The internal consistency reliability using alpha coefficients of the scales, regardless of language, ranged from 0.67 to 0.89. CONCLUSION: The results provide strong evidence that the RDQ is amenable to translation and represents a viable instrument for assessing response to treatment, and symptom severity.
format Text
id pubmed-2390523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23905232008-05-21 The Reflux Disease Questionnaire: a measure for assessment of treatment response in clinical trials Shaw, Michael Dent, John Beebe, Timothy Junghard, Ola Wiklund, Ingela Lind, Tore Johnsson, Folke Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Critical needs for treatment trials in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) include assessing response to treatment, evaluating symptom severity, and translation of symptom questionnaires into multiple languages. We evaluated the previously validated Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) for internal consistency, reliability, responsiveness to change during treatment and the concordance between RDQ and specialty physician assessment of symptom severity, after translation into Swedish and Norwegian. METHODS: Performance of the RDQ after translation into Swedish and Norwegian was evaluated in 439 patients with presumed GERD in a randomized, double-blind trial of active treatment with a proton pump inhibitor. RESULTS: The responsiveness was excellent across three RDQ indicators. Mean change scores in patients on active treatment were large, also reflected in effect sizes that ranged from a low of 1.05 (dyspepsia) to a high of 2.05 (heartburn) and standardized response means 0.99 (dyspepsia) and 1.52 (heartburn). A good positive correlation between physician severity ratings and RDQ scale scores was seen. The internal consistency reliability using alpha coefficients of the scales, regardless of language, ranged from 0.67 to 0.89. CONCLUSION: The results provide strong evidence that the RDQ is amenable to translation and represents a viable instrument for assessing response to treatment, and symptom severity. BioMed Central 2008-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2390523/ /pubmed/18447946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-31 Text en Copyright © 2008 Shaw et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Shaw, Michael
Dent, John
Beebe, Timothy
Junghard, Ola
Wiklund, Ingela
Lind, Tore
Johnsson, Folke
The Reflux Disease Questionnaire: a measure for assessment of treatment response in clinical trials
title The Reflux Disease Questionnaire: a measure for assessment of treatment response in clinical trials
title_full The Reflux Disease Questionnaire: a measure for assessment of treatment response in clinical trials
title_fullStr The Reflux Disease Questionnaire: a measure for assessment of treatment response in clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed The Reflux Disease Questionnaire: a measure for assessment of treatment response in clinical trials
title_short The Reflux Disease Questionnaire: a measure for assessment of treatment response in clinical trials
title_sort reflux disease questionnaire: a measure for assessment of treatment response in clinical trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2390523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18447946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-31
work_keys_str_mv AT shawmichael therefluxdiseasequestionnaireameasureforassessmentoftreatmentresponseinclinicaltrials
AT dentjohn therefluxdiseasequestionnaireameasureforassessmentoftreatmentresponseinclinicaltrials
AT beebetimothy therefluxdiseasequestionnaireameasureforassessmentoftreatmentresponseinclinicaltrials
AT junghardola therefluxdiseasequestionnaireameasureforassessmentoftreatmentresponseinclinicaltrials
AT wiklundingela therefluxdiseasequestionnaireameasureforassessmentoftreatmentresponseinclinicaltrials
AT lindtore therefluxdiseasequestionnaireameasureforassessmentoftreatmentresponseinclinicaltrials
AT johnssonfolke therefluxdiseasequestionnaireameasureforassessmentoftreatmentresponseinclinicaltrials
AT shawmichael refluxdiseasequestionnaireameasureforassessmentoftreatmentresponseinclinicaltrials
AT dentjohn refluxdiseasequestionnaireameasureforassessmentoftreatmentresponseinclinicaltrials
AT beebetimothy refluxdiseasequestionnaireameasureforassessmentoftreatmentresponseinclinicaltrials
AT junghardola refluxdiseasequestionnaireameasureforassessmentoftreatmentresponseinclinicaltrials
AT wiklundingela refluxdiseasequestionnaireameasureforassessmentoftreatmentresponseinclinicaltrials
AT lindtore refluxdiseasequestionnaireameasureforassessmentoftreatmentresponseinclinicaltrials
AT johnssonfolke refluxdiseasequestionnaireameasureforassessmentoftreatmentresponseinclinicaltrials