Cargando…
Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer
Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX), a macromolecule drug conjugate linking paclitaxel to polyglutamic acid, reduces systemic exposure to peak concentrations of free paclitaxel. Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received one prior platinum-based chemotherapy received 175 or 210 mg m(−...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2391114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18475293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604372 |
_version_ | 1782155341240205312 |
---|---|
author | Paz-Ares, L Ross, H O'Brien, M Riviere, A Gatzemeier, U Von Pawel, J Kaukel, E Freitag, L Digel, W Bischoff, H García-Campelo, R Iannotti, N Reiterer, P Bover, I Prendiville, J Eisenfeld, A J Oldham, F B Bandstra, B Singer, J W Bonomi, P |
author_facet | Paz-Ares, L Ross, H O'Brien, M Riviere, A Gatzemeier, U Von Pawel, J Kaukel, E Freitag, L Digel, W Bischoff, H García-Campelo, R Iannotti, N Reiterer, P Bover, I Prendiville, J Eisenfeld, A J Oldham, F B Bandstra, B Singer, J W Bonomi, P |
author_sort | Paz-Ares, L |
collection | PubMed |
description | Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX), a macromolecule drug conjugate linking paclitaxel to polyglutamic acid, reduces systemic exposure to peak concentrations of free paclitaxel. Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received one prior platinum-based chemotherapy received 175 or 210 mg m(−2) PPX or 75 mg m(−2) docetaxel. The study enrolled 849 previously treated NSCLC patients with advanced disease. Median survival (6.9 months in both arms, hazard ratio=1.09, P=0.257), 1-year survival (PPX=25%, docetaxel=29%, P=0.134), and time to progression (PPX=2 months, docetaxel=2.6 months, P=0.075) were similar between treatment arms. Paclitaxel poliglumex was associated with significantly less grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (P<0.001) and febrile neutropenia (P=0.006). Grade 3 or 4 neuropathy (P<0.001) was more common in the PPX arm. Patients receiving PPX had less alopecia and did not receive routine premedications. More patients discontinued due to adverse events in the PPX arm compared to the docetaxel arm (34 vs 16%, P<0.001). Paclitaxel poliglumex and docetaxel produced similar survival results but had different toxicity profiles. Compared with docetaxel, PPX had less febrile neutropenia and less alopecia, shorter infusion times, and elimination of routine use of medications to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Paclitaxel poliglumex at a dose of 210 mg m(−2) resulted in increased neurotoxicity compared with docetaxel. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2391114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23911142009-09-10 Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer Paz-Ares, L Ross, H O'Brien, M Riviere, A Gatzemeier, U Von Pawel, J Kaukel, E Freitag, L Digel, W Bischoff, H García-Campelo, R Iannotti, N Reiterer, P Bover, I Prendiville, J Eisenfeld, A J Oldham, F B Bandstra, B Singer, J W Bonomi, P Br J Cancer Clinical Study Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX), a macromolecule drug conjugate linking paclitaxel to polyglutamic acid, reduces systemic exposure to peak concentrations of free paclitaxel. Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received one prior platinum-based chemotherapy received 175 or 210 mg m(−2) PPX or 75 mg m(−2) docetaxel. The study enrolled 849 previously treated NSCLC patients with advanced disease. Median survival (6.9 months in both arms, hazard ratio=1.09, P=0.257), 1-year survival (PPX=25%, docetaxel=29%, P=0.134), and time to progression (PPX=2 months, docetaxel=2.6 months, P=0.075) were similar between treatment arms. Paclitaxel poliglumex was associated with significantly less grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (P<0.001) and febrile neutropenia (P=0.006). Grade 3 or 4 neuropathy (P<0.001) was more common in the PPX arm. Patients receiving PPX had less alopecia and did not receive routine premedications. More patients discontinued due to adverse events in the PPX arm compared to the docetaxel arm (34 vs 16%, P<0.001). Paclitaxel poliglumex and docetaxel produced similar survival results but had different toxicity profiles. Compared with docetaxel, PPX had less febrile neutropenia and less alopecia, shorter infusion times, and elimination of routine use of medications to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Paclitaxel poliglumex at a dose of 210 mg m(−2) resulted in increased neurotoxicity compared with docetaxel. Nature Publishing Group 2008-05-20 2008-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2391114/ /pubmed/18475293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604372 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Paz-Ares, L Ross, H O'Brien, M Riviere, A Gatzemeier, U Von Pawel, J Kaukel, E Freitag, L Digel, W Bischoff, H García-Campelo, R Iannotti, N Reiterer, P Bover, I Prendiville, J Eisenfeld, A J Oldham, F B Bandstra, B Singer, J W Bonomi, P Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer |
title | Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer |
title_full | Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer |
title_fullStr | Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer |
title_short | Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer |
title_sort | phase iii trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2391114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18475293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604372 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pazaresl phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT rossh phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT obrienm phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT rivierea phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT gatzemeieru phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT vonpawelj phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT kaukele phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT freitagl phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT digelw phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT bischoffh phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT garciacampelor phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT iannottin phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT reitererp phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT boveri phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT prendivillej phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT eisenfeldaj phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT oldhamfb phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT bandstrab phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT singerjw phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer AT bonomip phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer |