Cargando…

Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX), a macromolecule drug conjugate linking paclitaxel to polyglutamic acid, reduces systemic exposure to peak concentrations of free paclitaxel. Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received one prior platinum-based chemotherapy received 175 or 210 mg m(−...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paz-Ares, L, Ross, H, O'Brien, M, Riviere, A, Gatzemeier, U, Von Pawel, J, Kaukel, E, Freitag, L, Digel, W, Bischoff, H, García-Campelo, R, Iannotti, N, Reiterer, P, Bover, I, Prendiville, J, Eisenfeld, A J, Oldham, F B, Bandstra, B, Singer, J W, Bonomi, P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2391114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18475293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604372
_version_ 1782155341240205312
author Paz-Ares, L
Ross, H
O'Brien, M
Riviere, A
Gatzemeier, U
Von Pawel, J
Kaukel, E
Freitag, L
Digel, W
Bischoff, H
García-Campelo, R
Iannotti, N
Reiterer, P
Bover, I
Prendiville, J
Eisenfeld, A J
Oldham, F B
Bandstra, B
Singer, J W
Bonomi, P
author_facet Paz-Ares, L
Ross, H
O'Brien, M
Riviere, A
Gatzemeier, U
Von Pawel, J
Kaukel, E
Freitag, L
Digel, W
Bischoff, H
García-Campelo, R
Iannotti, N
Reiterer, P
Bover, I
Prendiville, J
Eisenfeld, A J
Oldham, F B
Bandstra, B
Singer, J W
Bonomi, P
author_sort Paz-Ares, L
collection PubMed
description Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX), a macromolecule drug conjugate linking paclitaxel to polyglutamic acid, reduces systemic exposure to peak concentrations of free paclitaxel. Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received one prior platinum-based chemotherapy received 175 or 210 mg m(−2) PPX or 75 mg m(−2) docetaxel. The study enrolled 849 previously treated NSCLC patients with advanced disease. Median survival (6.9 months in both arms, hazard ratio=1.09, P=0.257), 1-year survival (PPX=25%, docetaxel=29%, P=0.134), and time to progression (PPX=2 months, docetaxel=2.6 months, P=0.075) were similar between treatment arms. Paclitaxel poliglumex was associated with significantly less grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (P<0.001) and febrile neutropenia (P=0.006). Grade 3 or 4 neuropathy (P<0.001) was more common in the PPX arm. Patients receiving PPX had less alopecia and did not receive routine premedications. More patients discontinued due to adverse events in the PPX arm compared to the docetaxel arm (34 vs 16%, P<0.001). Paclitaxel poliglumex and docetaxel produced similar survival results but had different toxicity profiles. Compared with docetaxel, PPX had less febrile neutropenia and less alopecia, shorter infusion times, and elimination of routine use of medications to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Paclitaxel poliglumex at a dose of 210 mg m(−2) resulted in increased neurotoxicity compared with docetaxel.
format Text
id pubmed-2391114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23911142009-09-10 Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer Paz-Ares, L Ross, H O'Brien, M Riviere, A Gatzemeier, U Von Pawel, J Kaukel, E Freitag, L Digel, W Bischoff, H García-Campelo, R Iannotti, N Reiterer, P Bover, I Prendiville, J Eisenfeld, A J Oldham, F B Bandstra, B Singer, J W Bonomi, P Br J Cancer Clinical Study Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX), a macromolecule drug conjugate linking paclitaxel to polyglutamic acid, reduces systemic exposure to peak concentrations of free paclitaxel. Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received one prior platinum-based chemotherapy received 175 or 210 mg m(−2) PPX or 75 mg m(−2) docetaxel. The study enrolled 849 previously treated NSCLC patients with advanced disease. Median survival (6.9 months in both arms, hazard ratio=1.09, P=0.257), 1-year survival (PPX=25%, docetaxel=29%, P=0.134), and time to progression (PPX=2 months, docetaxel=2.6 months, P=0.075) were similar between treatment arms. Paclitaxel poliglumex was associated with significantly less grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (P<0.001) and febrile neutropenia (P=0.006). Grade 3 or 4 neuropathy (P<0.001) was more common in the PPX arm. Patients receiving PPX had less alopecia and did not receive routine premedications. More patients discontinued due to adverse events in the PPX arm compared to the docetaxel arm (34 vs 16%, P<0.001). Paclitaxel poliglumex and docetaxel produced similar survival results but had different toxicity profiles. Compared with docetaxel, PPX had less febrile neutropenia and less alopecia, shorter infusion times, and elimination of routine use of medications to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Paclitaxel poliglumex at a dose of 210 mg m(−2) resulted in increased neurotoxicity compared with docetaxel. Nature Publishing Group 2008-05-20 2008-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2391114/ /pubmed/18475293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604372 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Paz-Ares, L
Ross, H
O'Brien, M
Riviere, A
Gatzemeier, U
Von Pawel, J
Kaukel, E
Freitag, L
Digel, W
Bischoff, H
García-Campelo, R
Iannotti, N
Reiterer, P
Bover, I
Prendiville, J
Eisenfeld, A J
Oldham, F B
Bandstra, B
Singer, J W
Bonomi, P
Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer
title Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer
title_full Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer
title_fullStr Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer
title_short Phase III trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer
title_sort phase iii trial comparing paclitaxel poliglumex vs docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2391114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18475293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604372
work_keys_str_mv AT pazaresl phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT rossh phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT obrienm phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT rivierea phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT gatzemeieru phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT vonpawelj phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kaukele phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT freitagl phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT digelw phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT bischoffh phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT garciacampelor phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT iannottin phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT reitererp phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT boveri phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT prendivillej phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT eisenfeldaj phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT oldhamfb phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT bandstrab phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT singerjw phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT bonomip phaseiiitrialcomparingpaclitaxelpoliglumexvsdocetaxelinthesecondlinetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancer