Cargando…

A phase II trial of lomeguatrib and temozolomide in metastatic colorectal cancer

To evaluate the tumour response to lomeguatrib and temozolomide (TMZ) administered for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Patients with stage IV metastatic colorectal carcinoma received lomeguatrib (40 mg) and TMZ (50–200 mg m(−2)) orally for 5 consecu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, O A, Ranson, M, Michael, M, Olver, I, Levitt, N C, Mortimer, P, Watson, A J, Margison, G P, Midgley, R, Middleton, M R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2391129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18475294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604366
_version_ 1782155344821092352
author Khan, O A
Ranson, M
Michael, M
Olver, I
Levitt, N C
Mortimer, P
Watson, A J
Margison, G P
Midgley, R
Middleton, M R
author_facet Khan, O A
Ranson, M
Michael, M
Olver, I
Levitt, N C
Mortimer, P
Watson, A J
Margison, G P
Midgley, R
Middleton, M R
author_sort Khan, O A
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the tumour response to lomeguatrib and temozolomide (TMZ) administered for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Patients with stage IV metastatic colorectal carcinoma received lomeguatrib (40 mg) and TMZ (50–200 mg m(−2)) orally for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Response was determined every two cycles. Pharmacokinetics of lomeguatrib and TMZ as well as their pharmacodynamic effects in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were determined. Nineteen patients received 49 cycles of treatments. Despite consistent depletion of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in PBMC, none of the patients responded to treatment. Three patients had stable disease, one for the duration of the study, and no fall in carcinoembryonic antigen was observed in any patient. Median time to progression was 50 days. The commonest adverse effects were gastrointestinal and haematological and these were comparable to those of TMZ when given alone. This combination of lomeguatrib and TMZ is not efficacious in metastatic colorectal cancer. If further studies are to be performed, emerging data suggest that higher daily doses of lomeguatrib and a dosing period beyond that of TMZ should be evaluated.
format Text
id pubmed-2391129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23911292009-09-10 A phase II trial of lomeguatrib and temozolomide in metastatic colorectal cancer Khan, O A Ranson, M Michael, M Olver, I Levitt, N C Mortimer, P Watson, A J Margison, G P Midgley, R Middleton, M R Br J Cancer Clinical Study To evaluate the tumour response to lomeguatrib and temozolomide (TMZ) administered for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Patients with stage IV metastatic colorectal carcinoma received lomeguatrib (40 mg) and TMZ (50–200 mg m(−2)) orally for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Response was determined every two cycles. Pharmacokinetics of lomeguatrib and TMZ as well as their pharmacodynamic effects in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were determined. Nineteen patients received 49 cycles of treatments. Despite consistent depletion of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in PBMC, none of the patients responded to treatment. Three patients had stable disease, one for the duration of the study, and no fall in carcinoembryonic antigen was observed in any patient. Median time to progression was 50 days. The commonest adverse effects were gastrointestinal and haematological and these were comparable to those of TMZ when given alone. This combination of lomeguatrib and TMZ is not efficacious in metastatic colorectal cancer. If further studies are to be performed, emerging data suggest that higher daily doses of lomeguatrib and a dosing period beyond that of TMZ should be evaluated. Nature Publishing Group 2008-05-20 2008-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2391129/ /pubmed/18475294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604366 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Khan, O A
Ranson, M
Michael, M
Olver, I
Levitt, N C
Mortimer, P
Watson, A J
Margison, G P
Midgley, R
Middleton, M R
A phase II trial of lomeguatrib and temozolomide in metastatic colorectal cancer
title A phase II trial of lomeguatrib and temozolomide in metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full A phase II trial of lomeguatrib and temozolomide in metastatic colorectal cancer
title_fullStr A phase II trial of lomeguatrib and temozolomide in metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed A phase II trial of lomeguatrib and temozolomide in metastatic colorectal cancer
title_short A phase II trial of lomeguatrib and temozolomide in metastatic colorectal cancer
title_sort phase ii trial of lomeguatrib and temozolomide in metastatic colorectal cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2391129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18475294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604366
work_keys_str_mv AT khanoa aphaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT ransonm aphaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT michaelm aphaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT olveri aphaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT levittnc aphaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT mortimerp aphaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT watsonaj aphaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT margisongp aphaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT midgleyr aphaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT middletonmr aphaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT khanoa phaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT ransonm phaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT michaelm phaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT olveri phaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT levittnc phaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT mortimerp phaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT watsonaj phaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT margisongp phaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT midgleyr phaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT middletonmr phaseiitrialoflomeguatribandtemozolomideinmetastaticcolorectalcancer