Cargando…

Treatment needs and acknowledgement of illness – importance for satisfaction with psychiatric inpatient treatment

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is an important, but controversial part of health service evaluation. This study dealt with how acknowledgement of illness and treatment needs effected the distribution of positive, neutral and negative evaluations in a group of first time admitted patients to a psyc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soergaard, Knut W, Nivison, Mary, Hansen, Vidje, Oeiesvold, Terje
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2391161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18479506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-103
_version_ 1782155351492132864
author Soergaard, Knut W
Nivison, Mary
Hansen, Vidje
Oeiesvold, Terje
author_facet Soergaard, Knut W
Nivison, Mary
Hansen, Vidje
Oeiesvold, Terje
author_sort Soergaard, Knut W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is an important, but controversial part of health service evaluation. This study dealt with how acknowledgement of illness and treatment needs effected the distribution of positive, neutral and negative evaluations in a group of first time admitted patients to a psychiatric hospital. METHOD: The participants filled out a standardized user satisfaction form before discharge. The number of positive, neutral and negative evaluations for each participant was calculated and used as dependent variables in analyses (Classification Tree) where acknowledgement of illness (The Patients' Experience of Hospitalisation Questionnaire) and treatment needs (HoNOS) were used as explanatory variables in addition to a number of potential confounders. RESULTS: Different constellations of variables explained the three dependent variables. The number of positive scores was a function of age and worry (PEH); neutral scores were explained by HoNOS rated social needs and GAF (functional scale), both at admission. Outcome (GAF functional scale) and age explained the number of negative scores. CONCLUSION: (1) Moderately high negative correlations between positive and neutral scores, and between positive and negative scores, together with a positive correlation between the number of negative and neutral ratings was interpreted to mean that neutral scores sometimes function as undercommunicated negative evaluations. These could better be studied by qualitative methods. (2) The worry subscale (PEH) was important in identifying the majority of patients with the highest numbers of positive scores (patients older than 27.5 yrs with high worry score at admission.). The most dissatisfied group was characterised by denial of both mental problems and need for treatment. (3) Patients with high scores on the HoNOS Social subscale had the highest number of neutral scores. To the extent that neutral evaluations have negative connotations, treatment should focus more effectively on the patients' social needs. (4) The smallest number of negative scores was found among older patients with high functional improvement (GAF F). (5) Increasing age consistently predicted higher satisfaction. A better understanding of why younger patients are more dissatisfied is needed.
format Text
id pubmed-2391161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23911612008-05-22 Treatment needs and acknowledgement of illness – importance for satisfaction with psychiatric inpatient treatment Soergaard, Knut W Nivison, Mary Hansen, Vidje Oeiesvold, Terje BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is an important, but controversial part of health service evaluation. This study dealt with how acknowledgement of illness and treatment needs effected the distribution of positive, neutral and negative evaluations in a group of first time admitted patients to a psychiatric hospital. METHOD: The participants filled out a standardized user satisfaction form before discharge. The number of positive, neutral and negative evaluations for each participant was calculated and used as dependent variables in analyses (Classification Tree) where acknowledgement of illness (The Patients' Experience of Hospitalisation Questionnaire) and treatment needs (HoNOS) were used as explanatory variables in addition to a number of potential confounders. RESULTS: Different constellations of variables explained the three dependent variables. The number of positive scores was a function of age and worry (PEH); neutral scores were explained by HoNOS rated social needs and GAF (functional scale), both at admission. Outcome (GAF functional scale) and age explained the number of negative scores. CONCLUSION: (1) Moderately high negative correlations between positive and neutral scores, and between positive and negative scores, together with a positive correlation between the number of negative and neutral ratings was interpreted to mean that neutral scores sometimes function as undercommunicated negative evaluations. These could better be studied by qualitative methods. (2) The worry subscale (PEH) was important in identifying the majority of patients with the highest numbers of positive scores (patients older than 27.5 yrs with high worry score at admission.). The most dissatisfied group was characterised by denial of both mental problems and need for treatment. (3) Patients with high scores on the HoNOS Social subscale had the highest number of neutral scores. To the extent that neutral evaluations have negative connotations, treatment should focus more effectively on the patients' social needs. (4) The smallest number of negative scores was found among older patients with high functional improvement (GAF F). (5) Increasing age consistently predicted higher satisfaction. A better understanding of why younger patients are more dissatisfied is needed. BioMed Central 2008-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2391161/ /pubmed/18479506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-103 Text en Copyright © 2008 Soergaard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Soergaard, Knut W
Nivison, Mary
Hansen, Vidje
Oeiesvold, Terje
Treatment needs and acknowledgement of illness – importance for satisfaction with psychiatric inpatient treatment
title Treatment needs and acknowledgement of illness – importance for satisfaction with psychiatric inpatient treatment
title_full Treatment needs and acknowledgement of illness – importance for satisfaction with psychiatric inpatient treatment
title_fullStr Treatment needs and acknowledgement of illness – importance for satisfaction with psychiatric inpatient treatment
title_full_unstemmed Treatment needs and acknowledgement of illness – importance for satisfaction with psychiatric inpatient treatment
title_short Treatment needs and acknowledgement of illness – importance for satisfaction with psychiatric inpatient treatment
title_sort treatment needs and acknowledgement of illness – importance for satisfaction with psychiatric inpatient treatment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2391161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18479506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-103
work_keys_str_mv AT soergaardknutw treatmentneedsandacknowledgementofillnessimportanceforsatisfactionwithpsychiatricinpatienttreatment
AT nivisonmary treatmentneedsandacknowledgementofillnessimportanceforsatisfactionwithpsychiatricinpatienttreatment
AT hansenvidje treatmentneedsandacknowledgementofillnessimportanceforsatisfactionwithpsychiatricinpatienttreatment
AT oeiesvoldterje treatmentneedsandacknowledgementofillnessimportanceforsatisfactionwithpsychiatricinpatienttreatment