Cargando…

Strategies to optimize analgesia and sedation

Achieving adequate but not excessive sedation in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients is a complex process. Analgesics and sedatives employed in this context are extremely potent, and drug requirements and metabolism are unpredictable. Clinicians must have heightened awareness of the pot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schweickert, William D, Kress, John P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2391265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18495057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6151
_version_ 1782155358033149952
author Schweickert, William D
Kress, John P
author_facet Schweickert, William D
Kress, John P
author_sort Schweickert, William D
collection PubMed
description Achieving adequate but not excessive sedation in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients is a complex process. Analgesics and sedatives employed in this context are extremely potent, and drug requirements and metabolism are unpredictable. Clinicians must have heightened awareness of the potential for enduring effects and are encouraged to employ strategies that maximize benefit while minimizing risk. Successful sedation protocols have three basic components: frequent assessments for pain, anxiety, and agitation using a reproducible scale; combination therapy coupling opioids and sedatives; and, most importantly, careful communication between team members, with a particular recognition that the bedside nurse must be empowered to pair assessments with drug manipulation. In recent years, two broad categories of sedation protocols have achieved clinical success in terms of decreasing duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit length of stay by minimizing drug accumulation. Patient-targeted sedation protocols (the first category) rely on structured assessments to guide a careful schema of titrated drug escalation and withdrawal. Variation exists in the assessment tool utilized, but the optimal goal in all strategies is a patient who is awake and can be readily examined. Alternatively, daily interruption of continuous sedative infusions (the second category) may be employed to focus care providers on the goal of achieving a period of awakening in the earliest phases of critical illness possible. Newer literature has focused on the safety of this strategy and its comparison with intermittent drug administration. Ongoing investigations are evaluating the broad applicability of these types of protocols, and currently one may only speculate on whether one strategy is superior to another.
format Text
id pubmed-2391265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23912652008-05-23 Strategies to optimize analgesia and sedation Schweickert, William D Kress, John P Crit Care Review Achieving adequate but not excessive sedation in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients is a complex process. Analgesics and sedatives employed in this context are extremely potent, and drug requirements and metabolism are unpredictable. Clinicians must have heightened awareness of the potential for enduring effects and are encouraged to employ strategies that maximize benefit while minimizing risk. Successful sedation protocols have three basic components: frequent assessments for pain, anxiety, and agitation using a reproducible scale; combination therapy coupling opioids and sedatives; and, most importantly, careful communication between team members, with a particular recognition that the bedside nurse must be empowered to pair assessments with drug manipulation. In recent years, two broad categories of sedation protocols have achieved clinical success in terms of decreasing duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit length of stay by minimizing drug accumulation. Patient-targeted sedation protocols (the first category) rely on structured assessments to guide a careful schema of titrated drug escalation and withdrawal. Variation exists in the assessment tool utilized, but the optimal goal in all strategies is a patient who is awake and can be readily examined. Alternatively, daily interruption of continuous sedative infusions (the second category) may be employed to focus care providers on the goal of achieving a period of awakening in the earliest phases of critical illness possible. Newer literature has focused on the safety of this strategy and its comparison with intermittent drug administration. Ongoing investigations are evaluating the broad applicability of these types of protocols, and currently one may only speculate on whether one strategy is superior to another. BioMed Central 2008 2008-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2391265/ /pubmed/18495057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6151 Text en Copyright © 2008 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Review
Schweickert, William D
Kress, John P
Strategies to optimize analgesia and sedation
title Strategies to optimize analgesia and sedation
title_full Strategies to optimize analgesia and sedation
title_fullStr Strategies to optimize analgesia and sedation
title_full_unstemmed Strategies to optimize analgesia and sedation
title_short Strategies to optimize analgesia and sedation
title_sort strategies to optimize analgesia and sedation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2391265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18495057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6151
work_keys_str_mv AT schweickertwilliamd strategiestooptimizeanalgesiaandsedation
AT kressjohnp strategiestooptimizeanalgesiaandsedation