Cargando…

Role of Bcl-2 as a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis

The role of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 in lung cancer remains controversial. In order to clarify its impact on survival in small and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we performed a systematic review of the literature. Trials were selected for further analysis if they provided an independent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, B, Paesmans, M, Berghmans, T, Branle, F, Ghisdal, L, Mascaux, C, Meert, A-P, Steels, E, Vallot, F, Verdebout, J-M, Lafitte, J-J, Sculier, J-P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2394216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12838300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601095
_version_ 1782155365977161728
author Martin, B
Paesmans, M
Berghmans, T
Branle, F
Ghisdal, L
Mascaux, C
Meert, A-P
Steels, E
Vallot, F
Verdebout, J-M
Lafitte, J-J
Sculier, J-P
author_facet Martin, B
Paesmans, M
Berghmans, T
Branle, F
Ghisdal, L
Mascaux, C
Meert, A-P
Steels, E
Vallot, F
Verdebout, J-M
Lafitte, J-J
Sculier, J-P
author_sort Martin, B
collection PubMed
description The role of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 in lung cancer remains controversial. In order to clarify its impact on survival in small and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we performed a systematic review of the literature. Trials were selected for further analysis if they provided an independent assessment of Bcl-2 in lung cancer and reported analysis of survival data according to Bcl-2 status. To make it possible to aggregate survival results of the published studies, their methodology was assessed using a quality scale designed by the European Lung Cancer Working Party (including study design, laboratory methods and analysis). Of 28 studies, 11 identified Bcl-2 expression as a favourable prognostic factor and three linked it with poor prognosis; 14 trials were not significant. No differences in scoring measurement were detected between the studies, except that significantly higher scores were found in the trials with the largest sample sizes. Assessments of methodology and of laboratory technique were made independently of the conclusion of the trials. A total of 25 trials, comprising 3370 patients, provided sufficient information for the meta-analysis. The studies were categorised according to histology, disease stage and laboratory technique. The combined hazard ratio (HR) suggested that a positive Bcl-2 status has a favourable impact on survival: 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.57–0.86) in seven studies on stages I–II NSCLC; 0.50 (0.39–0.65) in eight studies on surgically resected NSCLC; 0.91 (0.76–1.10) in six studies on any stage NSCLC; 0.57 (0.41–0.78) in five studies on squamous cell cancer; 0.75 (0.61–0.93) and 0.71 (0.61–0.83) respectively for five studies detecting Bcl-2 by immunohistochemistry with Ab clone 100 and for 13 studies assessing Bcl-2 with Ab clone 124; 0.92 (0.73–1.16) for four studies on small cell lung cancer; 1.26 (0.58–2.72) for three studies on neuroendocrine tumours. In NSCLC, Bcl-2 expression was associated with a better prognosis. The data on Bcl-2 expression in small cell lung cancer were insufficient to assess its prognostic value.
format Text
id pubmed-2394216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23942162009-09-10 Role of Bcl-2 as a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis Martin, B Paesmans, M Berghmans, T Branle, F Ghisdal, L Mascaux, C Meert, A-P Steels, E Vallot, F Verdebout, J-M Lafitte, J-J Sculier, J-P Br J Cancer Clinical The role of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 in lung cancer remains controversial. In order to clarify its impact on survival in small and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we performed a systematic review of the literature. Trials were selected for further analysis if they provided an independent assessment of Bcl-2 in lung cancer and reported analysis of survival data according to Bcl-2 status. To make it possible to aggregate survival results of the published studies, their methodology was assessed using a quality scale designed by the European Lung Cancer Working Party (including study design, laboratory methods and analysis). Of 28 studies, 11 identified Bcl-2 expression as a favourable prognostic factor and three linked it with poor prognosis; 14 trials were not significant. No differences in scoring measurement were detected between the studies, except that significantly higher scores were found in the trials with the largest sample sizes. Assessments of methodology and of laboratory technique were made independently of the conclusion of the trials. A total of 25 trials, comprising 3370 patients, provided sufficient information for the meta-analysis. The studies were categorised according to histology, disease stage and laboratory technique. The combined hazard ratio (HR) suggested that a positive Bcl-2 status has a favourable impact on survival: 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.57–0.86) in seven studies on stages I–II NSCLC; 0.50 (0.39–0.65) in eight studies on surgically resected NSCLC; 0.91 (0.76–1.10) in six studies on any stage NSCLC; 0.57 (0.41–0.78) in five studies on squamous cell cancer; 0.75 (0.61–0.93) and 0.71 (0.61–0.83) respectively for five studies detecting Bcl-2 by immunohistochemistry with Ab clone 100 and for 13 studies assessing Bcl-2 with Ab clone 124; 0.92 (0.73–1.16) for four studies on small cell lung cancer; 1.26 (0.58–2.72) for three studies on neuroendocrine tumours. In NSCLC, Bcl-2 expression was associated with a better prognosis. The data on Bcl-2 expression in small cell lung cancer were insufficient to assess its prognostic value. Nature Publishing Group 2003-07-07 2003-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2394216/ /pubmed/12838300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601095 Text en Copyright © 2003 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical
Martin, B
Paesmans, M
Berghmans, T
Branle, F
Ghisdal, L
Mascaux, C
Meert, A-P
Steels, E
Vallot, F
Verdebout, J-M
Lafitte, J-J
Sculier, J-P
Role of Bcl-2 as a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis
title Role of Bcl-2 as a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis
title_full Role of Bcl-2 as a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis
title_fullStr Role of Bcl-2 as a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Role of Bcl-2 as a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis
title_short Role of Bcl-2 as a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis
title_sort role of bcl-2 as a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2394216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12838300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601095
work_keys_str_mv AT martinb roleofbcl2asaprognosticfactorforsurvivalinlungcancerasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithmetaanalysis
AT paesmansm roleofbcl2asaprognosticfactorforsurvivalinlungcancerasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithmetaanalysis
AT berghmanst roleofbcl2asaprognosticfactorforsurvivalinlungcancerasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithmetaanalysis
AT branlef roleofbcl2asaprognosticfactorforsurvivalinlungcancerasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithmetaanalysis
AT ghisdall roleofbcl2asaprognosticfactorforsurvivalinlungcancerasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithmetaanalysis
AT mascauxc roleofbcl2asaprognosticfactorforsurvivalinlungcancerasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithmetaanalysis
AT meertap roleofbcl2asaprognosticfactorforsurvivalinlungcancerasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithmetaanalysis
AT steelse roleofbcl2asaprognosticfactorforsurvivalinlungcancerasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithmetaanalysis
AT vallotf roleofbcl2asaprognosticfactorforsurvivalinlungcancerasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithmetaanalysis
AT verdeboutjm roleofbcl2asaprognosticfactorforsurvivalinlungcancerasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithmetaanalysis
AT lafittejj roleofbcl2asaprognosticfactorforsurvivalinlungcancerasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithmetaanalysis
AT sculierjp roleofbcl2asaprognosticfactorforsurvivalinlungcancerasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithmetaanalysis