Cargando…
Outcome of follicular lymphoma grade 3: is anthracycline necessary as front-line therapy?
A grading system (grades 1–3) for follicular lymphoma (FL) is used in the WHO classification for lymphoid malignancies based on the absolute number of centroblasts in the neoplastic follicles. Grade 3 FL is further subdivided into 3a and 3b depending on the presence or absence of centrocytes. A tota...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2394229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12838297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601006 |
_version_ | 1782155369005449216 |
---|---|
author | Chau, I Jones, R Cunningham, D Wotherspoon, A Maisey, N Norman, A R Jain, P Bishop, L Horwich, A Catovsky, D |
author_facet | Chau, I Jones, R Cunningham, D Wotherspoon, A Maisey, N Norman, A R Jain, P Bishop, L Horwich, A Catovsky, D |
author_sort | Chau, I |
collection | PubMed |
description | A grading system (grades 1–3) for follicular lymphoma (FL) is used in the WHO classification for lymphoid malignancies based on the absolute number of centroblasts in the neoplastic follicles. Grade 3 FL is further subdivided into 3a and 3b depending on the presence or absence of centrocytes. A total of 231 patients with FL, referred from 1970 to 2001, were identified from our prospectively maintained database. Original diagnostic materials were available for review on 215 patients and these were reclassified according to the WHO grading system. Follicular lymphoma grades 1, 2 and 3 accounted for 92, 68 and 55 patients, respectively. No significant overall survival (OS) differences were observed among FL grades 1–3 (log rank P=0.25) or between grades 3a and 3b (log rank P=0.20). No significant failure-free survival (FFS) differences were observed among FL grades 1–3 (log rank P=0.72) or between grades 3a and 3b (log rank P=0.11). First-line anthracyclines did not influence OS or FFS (log rank P=0.86, P=0.58, respectively) in patients with FL grade 3. There are long-term survivors among patients with FL grade 3 with a continuing risk of relapse. Anthracyclines did not appear to influence survival or disease relapses when given as front-line therapy in our series. The role of anthracyclines should be further evaluated in large randomised studies. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2394229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23942292009-09-10 Outcome of follicular lymphoma grade 3: is anthracycline necessary as front-line therapy? Chau, I Jones, R Cunningham, D Wotherspoon, A Maisey, N Norman, A R Jain, P Bishop, L Horwich, A Catovsky, D Br J Cancer Clinical A grading system (grades 1–3) for follicular lymphoma (FL) is used in the WHO classification for lymphoid malignancies based on the absolute number of centroblasts in the neoplastic follicles. Grade 3 FL is further subdivided into 3a and 3b depending on the presence or absence of centrocytes. A total of 231 patients with FL, referred from 1970 to 2001, were identified from our prospectively maintained database. Original diagnostic materials were available for review on 215 patients and these were reclassified according to the WHO grading system. Follicular lymphoma grades 1, 2 and 3 accounted for 92, 68 and 55 patients, respectively. No significant overall survival (OS) differences were observed among FL grades 1–3 (log rank P=0.25) or between grades 3a and 3b (log rank P=0.20). No significant failure-free survival (FFS) differences were observed among FL grades 1–3 (log rank P=0.72) or between grades 3a and 3b (log rank P=0.11). First-line anthracyclines did not influence OS or FFS (log rank P=0.86, P=0.58, respectively) in patients with FL grade 3. There are long-term survivors among patients with FL grade 3 with a continuing risk of relapse. Anthracyclines did not appear to influence survival or disease relapses when given as front-line therapy in our series. The role of anthracyclines should be further evaluated in large randomised studies. Nature Publishing Group 2003-07-07 2003-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2394229/ /pubmed/12838297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601006 Text en Copyright © 2003 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Chau, I Jones, R Cunningham, D Wotherspoon, A Maisey, N Norman, A R Jain, P Bishop, L Horwich, A Catovsky, D Outcome of follicular lymphoma grade 3: is anthracycline necessary as front-line therapy? |
title | Outcome of follicular lymphoma grade 3: is anthracycline necessary as front-line therapy? |
title_full | Outcome of follicular lymphoma grade 3: is anthracycline necessary as front-line therapy? |
title_fullStr | Outcome of follicular lymphoma grade 3: is anthracycline necessary as front-line therapy? |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcome of follicular lymphoma grade 3: is anthracycline necessary as front-line therapy? |
title_short | Outcome of follicular lymphoma grade 3: is anthracycline necessary as front-line therapy? |
title_sort | outcome of follicular lymphoma grade 3: is anthracycline necessary as front-line therapy? |
topic | Clinical |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2394229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12838297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaui outcomeoffollicularlymphomagrade3isanthracyclinenecessaryasfrontlinetherapy AT jonesr outcomeoffollicularlymphomagrade3isanthracyclinenecessaryasfrontlinetherapy AT cunninghamd outcomeoffollicularlymphomagrade3isanthracyclinenecessaryasfrontlinetherapy AT wotherspoona outcomeoffollicularlymphomagrade3isanthracyclinenecessaryasfrontlinetherapy AT maiseyn outcomeoffollicularlymphomagrade3isanthracyclinenecessaryasfrontlinetherapy AT normanar outcomeoffollicularlymphomagrade3isanthracyclinenecessaryasfrontlinetherapy AT jainp outcomeoffollicularlymphomagrade3isanthracyclinenecessaryasfrontlinetherapy AT bishopl outcomeoffollicularlymphomagrade3isanthracyclinenecessaryasfrontlinetherapy AT horwicha outcomeoffollicularlymphomagrade3isanthracyclinenecessaryasfrontlinetherapy AT catovskyd outcomeoffollicularlymphomagrade3isanthracyclinenecessaryasfrontlinetherapy |