Cargando…
Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories
While most experts agree that cervical screening is effective, there remains controversy over the most appropriate screening interval. Annual screening is common in North America. In England, some argue for 3-yearly screening while others believe 5-yearly screening is adequate, and the frequency var...
Autores principales: | Sasieni, P, Adams, J, Cuzick, J |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2394236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12838306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600974 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Benefits and harms of cervical screening from age 20 years compared with screening from age 25 years
por: Landy, R, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Predicted impact of vaccination against human papillomavirus 16/18 on cancer incidence and cervical abnormalities in women aged 20–29 in the UK
por: Cuzick, J, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. The National Co-ordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group.
por: Sasieni, P. D., et al.
Publicado: (1996) -
Reply: The value of case–control audits of screening
por: Sasieni, P, et al.
Publicado: (2004) -
Impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence in England: a time trend analysis
por: Pesola, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2019)