Cargando…

Randomized Phase II trial assessing estramustine and vinblastine combination chemotherapy vs estramustine alone in patients with progressive hormone-escaped metastatic prostate cancer

Based on the results of combined data from three North American Phase II studies, a randomised Phase II study in the same patient population was performed, using combination chemotherapy with estramustine phosphate (EMP) and vinblastine (VBL) in hormone refractory prostate cancer patients. In all, 9...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albrecht, W, Van Poppel, H, Horenblas, S, Mickisch, G, Horwich, A, Serretta, V, Casetta, G, Maréchal, J M, Jones, W G, Kalman, S, Sylvester, R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2395315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14710214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601468
_version_ 1782155478394994688
author Albrecht, W
Van Poppel, H
Horenblas, S
Mickisch, G
Horwich, A
Serretta, V
Casetta, G
Maréchal, J M
Jones, W G
Kalman, S
Sylvester, R
author_facet Albrecht, W
Van Poppel, H
Horenblas, S
Mickisch, G
Horwich, A
Serretta, V
Casetta, G
Maréchal, J M
Jones, W G
Kalman, S
Sylvester, R
author_sort Albrecht, W
collection PubMed
description Based on the results of combined data from three North American Phase II studies, a randomised Phase II study in the same patient population was performed, using combination chemotherapy with estramustine phosphate (EMP) and vinblastine (VBL) in hormone refractory prostate cancer patients. In all, 92 patients were randomised into a Phase II study of oral EMP (10 mg kg day continuously) or oral EMP in combination with intravenous VBL (4 mg m(2) week for 6 weeks, followed by 2 weeks rest). The end points were toxicity and PSA response in both groups, with the option to continue the trial as a Phase III study with time to progression and survival as end points, if sufficient responses were observed. Toxicity was unexpectedly high in both treatment arms and led to treatment withdrawal or refusal in 49% of all patients, predominantly already during the first treatment cycle. The mean treatment duration was 10 and 14 weeks, median time to PSA progression was 27.2 and 30.8 weeks, median survival time was 44 and 50.9 weeks, and PSA response rate was only 24.6 and 28.9% in the EMP/VBL and EMP arms, respectively. There was no correlation between PSA response and survival. While the PSA response in the patients tested was less than half that recorded in the North American studies, the toxicity of EMP monotherapy or in combination with VBL was much higher than expected. Further research on more effective and less toxic treatment strategies for hormone refractory prostate cancer is mandatory.
format Text
id pubmed-2395315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23953152009-09-10 Randomized Phase II trial assessing estramustine and vinblastine combination chemotherapy vs estramustine alone in patients with progressive hormone-escaped metastatic prostate cancer Albrecht, W Van Poppel, H Horenblas, S Mickisch, G Horwich, A Serretta, V Casetta, G Maréchal, J M Jones, W G Kalman, S Sylvester, R Br J Cancer Clinical Based on the results of combined data from three North American Phase II studies, a randomised Phase II study in the same patient population was performed, using combination chemotherapy with estramustine phosphate (EMP) and vinblastine (VBL) in hormone refractory prostate cancer patients. In all, 92 patients were randomised into a Phase II study of oral EMP (10 mg kg day continuously) or oral EMP in combination with intravenous VBL (4 mg m(2) week for 6 weeks, followed by 2 weeks rest). The end points were toxicity and PSA response in both groups, with the option to continue the trial as a Phase III study with time to progression and survival as end points, if sufficient responses were observed. Toxicity was unexpectedly high in both treatment arms and led to treatment withdrawal or refusal in 49% of all patients, predominantly already during the first treatment cycle. The mean treatment duration was 10 and 14 weeks, median time to PSA progression was 27.2 and 30.8 weeks, median survival time was 44 and 50.9 weeks, and PSA response rate was only 24.6 and 28.9% in the EMP/VBL and EMP arms, respectively. There was no correlation between PSA response and survival. While the PSA response in the patients tested was less than half that recorded in the North American studies, the toxicity of EMP monotherapy or in combination with VBL was much higher than expected. Further research on more effective and less toxic treatment strategies for hormone refractory prostate cancer is mandatory. Nature Publishing Group 2004-01-12 2004-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2395315/ /pubmed/14710214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601468 Text en Copyright © 2004 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical
Albrecht, W
Van Poppel, H
Horenblas, S
Mickisch, G
Horwich, A
Serretta, V
Casetta, G
Maréchal, J M
Jones, W G
Kalman, S
Sylvester, R
Randomized Phase II trial assessing estramustine and vinblastine combination chemotherapy vs estramustine alone in patients with progressive hormone-escaped metastatic prostate cancer
title Randomized Phase II trial assessing estramustine and vinblastine combination chemotherapy vs estramustine alone in patients with progressive hormone-escaped metastatic prostate cancer
title_full Randomized Phase II trial assessing estramustine and vinblastine combination chemotherapy vs estramustine alone in patients with progressive hormone-escaped metastatic prostate cancer
title_fullStr Randomized Phase II trial assessing estramustine and vinblastine combination chemotherapy vs estramustine alone in patients with progressive hormone-escaped metastatic prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Randomized Phase II trial assessing estramustine and vinblastine combination chemotherapy vs estramustine alone in patients with progressive hormone-escaped metastatic prostate cancer
title_short Randomized Phase II trial assessing estramustine and vinblastine combination chemotherapy vs estramustine alone in patients with progressive hormone-escaped metastatic prostate cancer
title_sort randomized phase ii trial assessing estramustine and vinblastine combination chemotherapy vs estramustine alone in patients with progressive hormone-escaped metastatic prostate cancer
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2395315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14710214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601468
work_keys_str_mv AT albrechtw randomizedphaseiitrialassessingestramustineandvinblastinecombinationchemotherapyvsestramustinealoneinpatientswithprogressivehormoneescapedmetastaticprostatecancer
AT vanpoppelh randomizedphaseiitrialassessingestramustineandvinblastinecombinationchemotherapyvsestramustinealoneinpatientswithprogressivehormoneescapedmetastaticprostatecancer
AT horenblass randomizedphaseiitrialassessingestramustineandvinblastinecombinationchemotherapyvsestramustinealoneinpatientswithprogressivehormoneescapedmetastaticprostatecancer
AT mickischg randomizedphaseiitrialassessingestramustineandvinblastinecombinationchemotherapyvsestramustinealoneinpatientswithprogressivehormoneescapedmetastaticprostatecancer
AT horwicha randomizedphaseiitrialassessingestramustineandvinblastinecombinationchemotherapyvsestramustinealoneinpatientswithprogressivehormoneescapedmetastaticprostatecancer
AT serrettav randomizedphaseiitrialassessingestramustineandvinblastinecombinationchemotherapyvsestramustinealoneinpatientswithprogressivehormoneescapedmetastaticprostatecancer
AT casettag randomizedphaseiitrialassessingestramustineandvinblastinecombinationchemotherapyvsestramustinealoneinpatientswithprogressivehormoneescapedmetastaticprostatecancer
AT marechaljm randomizedphaseiitrialassessingestramustineandvinblastinecombinationchemotherapyvsestramustinealoneinpatientswithprogressivehormoneescapedmetastaticprostatecancer
AT joneswg randomizedphaseiitrialassessingestramustineandvinblastinecombinationchemotherapyvsestramustinealoneinpatientswithprogressivehormoneescapedmetastaticprostatecancer
AT kalmans randomizedphaseiitrialassessingestramustineandvinblastinecombinationchemotherapyvsestramustinealoneinpatientswithprogressivehormoneescapedmetastaticprostatecancer
AT sylvesterr randomizedphaseiitrialassessingestramustineandvinblastinecombinationchemotherapyvsestramustinealoneinpatientswithprogressivehormoneescapedmetastaticprostatecancer