Cargando…
Hand-Modelled Composite Prostheses after Resection of Peri-Acetabular Bone Malignancies
Purpose: To improve function after pelvic resection involving the acetabulum, using an anatomic composite implant built with screws and cement. Material and method: Since 1990, 66 patients with peri-acetabular bone malignancies have been treated by extensive resection followed by hand-modelled innom...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2395509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18521365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1357714031000114174 |
Sumario: | Purpose: To improve function after pelvic resection involving the acetabulum, using an anatomic composite implant built with screws and cement. Material and method: Since 1990, 66 patients with peri-acetabular bone malignancies have been treated by extensive resection followed by hand-modelled innominate prosthesis with partially constrained total hip prosthesis. The hand-modelled innominate prosthesis was made of a titanium cup, a set of long titanium screws and two or three packs of gentamycine-loaded cement. Results: Many postoperative complications were observed: deep infection (14%), hip prosthesis dislocation (25%) and local recurrence (15%). Sixteen patients (25%) had to be reoperated. Nevertheless, at last follow-up, 62 patients still had composite prosthesis. The mean functional result, rated according to a modified Enneking's staging system, was 80% with unlimited walking without support, average hip flexion 100°, length discrepancy less than 1 cm. Discussion: These results were similar to those described in the literature for custom-made innominate prostheses and much better than those of alternative reconstructive procedures. Hand-modelled composite prostheses are cheaper, easier, more adaptable and enables better anchorage than custom-made prostheses. Such a procedure can be used even after total iliac wing resection. Conclusion: The advantages of such a procedure plead for its extensive use after acetabular resection. But long-term follow-up is necessary to validate indications. |
---|