Cargando…

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Case for Dose Escalation and Organ at Risk Toxicity Reduction

Purpose: Radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma remains challenging because of proximity to surrounding organs at risk (OAR). We report the use of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas to minimize dose to OAR while concurrently optimizing tu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koshy, Mary, Landry, Jerome C., Lawson, Joshua D., Staley, Charles A., Esiashvili, Natia, Howell, Rebecca, Ghavidel, Shahram, Davis, Lawrence W.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2395528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18521378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13577140310001644751
_version_ 1782155527394951168
author Koshy, Mary
Landry, Jerome C.
Lawson, Joshua D.
Staley, Charles A.
Esiashvili, Natia
Howell, Rebecca
Ghavidel, Shahram
Davis, Lawrence W.
author_facet Koshy, Mary
Landry, Jerome C.
Lawson, Joshua D.
Staley, Charles A.
Esiashvili, Natia
Howell, Rebecca
Ghavidel, Shahram
Davis, Lawrence W.
author_sort Koshy, Mary
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma remains challenging because of proximity to surrounding organs at risk (OAR). We report the use of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas to minimize dose to OAR while concurrently optimizing tumor dose coverage. Patients and methods: From January 2000 to October 2002, 10 patients (average age 56 years) with retroperitoneal sarcoma and one with inguinal sarcoma were treated with radiation at Emory University. Prescription dose to the planning treatment volume (PTV) was commonly 50.4 at 1.8 Gy/fraction. CT simulation was used in each patient, three patients were treated with 3D-conformal treatment (3D-CRT), and the remaining eight received multi-leaf collimator-based (MLC) IMRT. IMRT treatment fields ranged from eight to 11 and average volume treated was 3498 cc. Optimal 3D-CRT plans were generated and compared with IMRT with respect to tumor coverage and OAR dose toxicity. Dose volume histograms were compared for both the 3D-CRT and IMRT plans. Results: Mean dose to small bowel decreased from 36 Gy with 3D-CRT to 27 Gy using IMRT, and tumor coverage (V95) increased from 95.3% with 3D-CRT to 98.6% using IMRT. Maximum and minimum doses delivered to the PTV were significantly increased by 6 and 22%, respectively (P = 0.011, P = 0.055). Volume of small bowel receiving > 30Gy was significantly decreased from 63.5 to 43.1% with IMRT compared with conventional treatment (P = 0.043). Seven patients developed grade 2 nausea, three developed grade 2 diarrhea, one had grade 2 skin toxicity, and one patient developed grade 3 liver toxicity (RTOG toxicity scale). No other delayed toxicities related to radiation were observed. At a median follow-up of 58 weeks, there were no local recurrences and only one patient developed disease progression with distant metastasis in the liver. Conclusions: IMRT for retroperitoneal sarcoma allowed enhanced tumor coverage and better sparing of dose to critical normal structures such as small bowel, liver, and kidney. Escalation of dose has a positive impact on local control for retroperitoneal sarcoma; IMRT may be an effective method to achieve this goal. We are evaluating preoperative dose escalation to 59.4 Gy.
format Text
id pubmed-2395528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23955282008-06-02 Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Case for Dose Escalation and Organ at Risk Toxicity Reduction Koshy, Mary Landry, Jerome C. Lawson, Joshua D. Staley, Charles A. Esiashvili, Natia Howell, Rebecca Ghavidel, Shahram Davis, Lawrence W. Sarcoma Research Article Purpose: Radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma remains challenging because of proximity to surrounding organs at risk (OAR). We report the use of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas to minimize dose to OAR while concurrently optimizing tumor dose coverage. Patients and methods: From January 2000 to October 2002, 10 patients (average age 56 years) with retroperitoneal sarcoma and one with inguinal sarcoma were treated with radiation at Emory University. Prescription dose to the planning treatment volume (PTV) was commonly 50.4 at 1.8 Gy/fraction. CT simulation was used in each patient, three patients were treated with 3D-conformal treatment (3D-CRT), and the remaining eight received multi-leaf collimator-based (MLC) IMRT. IMRT treatment fields ranged from eight to 11 and average volume treated was 3498 cc. Optimal 3D-CRT plans were generated and compared with IMRT with respect to tumor coverage and OAR dose toxicity. Dose volume histograms were compared for both the 3D-CRT and IMRT plans. Results: Mean dose to small bowel decreased from 36 Gy with 3D-CRT to 27 Gy using IMRT, and tumor coverage (V95) increased from 95.3% with 3D-CRT to 98.6% using IMRT. Maximum and minimum doses delivered to the PTV were significantly increased by 6 and 22%, respectively (P = 0.011, P = 0.055). Volume of small bowel receiving > 30Gy was significantly decreased from 63.5 to 43.1% with IMRT compared with conventional treatment (P = 0.043). Seven patients developed grade 2 nausea, three developed grade 2 diarrhea, one had grade 2 skin toxicity, and one patient developed grade 3 liver toxicity (RTOG toxicity scale). No other delayed toxicities related to radiation were observed. At a median follow-up of 58 weeks, there were no local recurrences and only one patient developed disease progression with distant metastasis in the liver. Conclusions: IMRT for retroperitoneal sarcoma allowed enhanced tumor coverage and better sparing of dose to critical normal structures such as small bowel, liver, and kidney. Escalation of dose has a positive impact on local control for retroperitoneal sarcoma; IMRT may be an effective method to achieve this goal. We are evaluating preoperative dose escalation to 59.4 Gy. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2003 /pmc/articles/PMC2395528/ /pubmed/18521378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13577140310001644751 Text en Copyright © 2003 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Koshy, Mary
Landry, Jerome C.
Lawson, Joshua D.
Staley, Charles A.
Esiashvili, Natia
Howell, Rebecca
Ghavidel, Shahram
Davis, Lawrence W.
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Case for Dose Escalation and Organ at Risk Toxicity Reduction
title Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Case for Dose Escalation and Organ at Risk Toxicity Reduction
title_full Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Case for Dose Escalation and Organ at Risk Toxicity Reduction
title_fullStr Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Case for Dose Escalation and Organ at Risk Toxicity Reduction
title_full_unstemmed Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Case for Dose Escalation and Organ at Risk Toxicity Reduction
title_short Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Case for Dose Escalation and Organ at Risk Toxicity Reduction
title_sort intensity modulated radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma: a case for dose escalation and organ at risk toxicity reduction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2395528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18521378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13577140310001644751
work_keys_str_mv AT koshymary intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforretroperitonealsarcomaacasefordoseescalationandorganatrisktoxicityreduction
AT landryjeromec intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforretroperitonealsarcomaacasefordoseescalationandorganatrisktoxicityreduction
AT lawsonjoshuad intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforretroperitonealsarcomaacasefordoseescalationandorganatrisktoxicityreduction
AT staleycharlesa intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforretroperitonealsarcomaacasefordoseescalationandorganatrisktoxicityreduction
AT esiashvilinatia intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforretroperitonealsarcomaacasefordoseescalationandorganatrisktoxicityreduction
AT howellrebecca intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforretroperitonealsarcomaacasefordoseescalationandorganatrisktoxicityreduction
AT ghavidelshahram intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforretroperitonealsarcomaacasefordoseescalationandorganatrisktoxicityreduction
AT davislawrencew intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforretroperitonealsarcomaacasefordoseescalationandorganatrisktoxicityreduction