Cargando…

How many human genes can be defined as housekeeping with current expression data?

BACKGROUND: Housekeeping (HK) genes are ubiquitously expressed in all tissue/cell types and constitute a basal transcriptome for the maintenance of basic cellular functions. Partitioning transcriptomes into HK and tissue-specific (TS) genes relatively is fundamental for studying gene expression and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Jiang, He, Fuhong, Song, Shuhui, Wang, Jing, Yu, Jun
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2396180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18416810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-172
_version_ 1782155545264783360
author Zhu, Jiang
He, Fuhong
Song, Shuhui
Wang, Jing
Yu, Jun
author_facet Zhu, Jiang
He, Fuhong
Song, Shuhui
Wang, Jing
Yu, Jun
author_sort Zhu, Jiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Housekeeping (HK) genes are ubiquitously expressed in all tissue/cell types and constitute a basal transcriptome for the maintenance of basic cellular functions. Partitioning transcriptomes into HK and tissue-specific (TS) genes relatively is fundamental for studying gene expression and cellular differentiation. Although many studies have aimed at large-scale and thorough categorization of human HK genes, a meaningful consensus has yet to be reached. RESULTS: We collected two latest gene expression datasets (both EST and microarray data) from public databases and analyzed the gene expression profiles in 18 human tissues that have been well-documented by both two data types. Benchmarked by a manually-curated HK gene collection (HK408), we demonstrated that present data from EST sampling was far from saturated, and the inadequacy has limited the gene detectability and our understanding of TS expressions. Due to a likely over-stringent threshold, microarray data showed higher false negative rate compared with EST data, leading to a significant underestimation of HK genes. Based on EST data, we found that 40.0% of the currently annotated human genes were universally expressed in at least 16 of 18 tissues, as compared to only 5.1% specifically expressed in a single tissue. Our current EST-based estimate on human HK genes ranged from 3,140 to 6,909 in number, a ten-fold increase in comparison with previous microarray-based estimates. CONCLUSION: We concluded that a significant fraction of human genes, at least in the currently annotated data depositories, was broadly expressed. Our understanding of tissue-specific expression was still preliminary and required much more large-scale and high-quality transcriptomic data in future studies. The new HK gene list categorized in this study will be useful for genome-wide analyses on structural and functional features of HK genes.
format Text
id pubmed-2396180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23961802008-05-24 How many human genes can be defined as housekeeping with current expression data? Zhu, Jiang He, Fuhong Song, Shuhui Wang, Jing Yu, Jun BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Housekeeping (HK) genes are ubiquitously expressed in all tissue/cell types and constitute a basal transcriptome for the maintenance of basic cellular functions. Partitioning transcriptomes into HK and tissue-specific (TS) genes relatively is fundamental for studying gene expression and cellular differentiation. Although many studies have aimed at large-scale and thorough categorization of human HK genes, a meaningful consensus has yet to be reached. RESULTS: We collected two latest gene expression datasets (both EST and microarray data) from public databases and analyzed the gene expression profiles in 18 human tissues that have been well-documented by both two data types. Benchmarked by a manually-curated HK gene collection (HK408), we demonstrated that present data from EST sampling was far from saturated, and the inadequacy has limited the gene detectability and our understanding of TS expressions. Due to a likely over-stringent threshold, microarray data showed higher false negative rate compared with EST data, leading to a significant underestimation of HK genes. Based on EST data, we found that 40.0% of the currently annotated human genes were universally expressed in at least 16 of 18 tissues, as compared to only 5.1% specifically expressed in a single tissue. Our current EST-based estimate on human HK genes ranged from 3,140 to 6,909 in number, a ten-fold increase in comparison with previous microarray-based estimates. CONCLUSION: We concluded that a significant fraction of human genes, at least in the currently annotated data depositories, was broadly expressed. Our understanding of tissue-specific expression was still preliminary and required much more large-scale and high-quality transcriptomic data in future studies. The new HK gene list categorized in this study will be useful for genome-wide analyses on structural and functional features of HK genes. BioMed Central 2008-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2396180/ /pubmed/18416810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-172 Text en Copyright © 2008 Zhu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhu, Jiang
He, Fuhong
Song, Shuhui
Wang, Jing
Yu, Jun
How many human genes can be defined as housekeeping with current expression data?
title How many human genes can be defined as housekeeping with current expression data?
title_full How many human genes can be defined as housekeeping with current expression data?
title_fullStr How many human genes can be defined as housekeeping with current expression data?
title_full_unstemmed How many human genes can be defined as housekeeping with current expression data?
title_short How many human genes can be defined as housekeeping with current expression data?
title_sort how many human genes can be defined as housekeeping with current expression data?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2396180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18416810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-172
work_keys_str_mv AT zhujiang howmanyhumangenescanbedefinedashousekeepingwithcurrentexpressiondata
AT hefuhong howmanyhumangenescanbedefinedashousekeepingwithcurrentexpressiondata
AT songshuhui howmanyhumangenescanbedefinedashousekeepingwithcurrentexpressiondata
AT wangjing howmanyhumangenescanbedefinedashousekeepingwithcurrentexpressiondata
AT yujun howmanyhumangenescanbedefinedashousekeepingwithcurrentexpressiondata