Cargando…

Inter-rater agreement of comorbid DSM-IV personality disorders in substance abusers

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the inter-rater agreement of personality disorders in clinical settings. METHODS: Clinicians rated 75 patients with substance use disorders on the DSM-IV criteria of personality disorders in random order, and on rating scales representing the severity of each. RESUL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hesse, Morten, Thylstrup, Birgitte
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2396616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18485229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-37
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Little is known about the inter-rater agreement of personality disorders in clinical settings. METHODS: Clinicians rated 75 patients with substance use disorders on the DSM-IV criteria of personality disorders in random order, and on rating scales representing the severity of each. RESULTS: Convergent validity agreement was moderate (range for r = 0.55, 0.67) for cluster B disorders rated with DSM-IV criteria, and discriminant validity was moderate for eight of the ten personality disorders. Convergent validity of the rating scales was only moderate for antisocial and narcissistic personality disorder. DISCUSSION: Dimensional ratings may be used in research studies and clinical practice with some caution, and may be collected as one of several sources of information to describe the personality of a patient.