Cargando…
A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School
INTRODUCTION: This study investigates active-transport-to-school initiatives through the Active Living by Design Community Action Model framework. The framework outlines five strategies that influence physical activity: preparation, promotion, programs, policies, and physical projects. METHODS: A co...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2396992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18341776 |
_version_ | 1782155604717993984 |
---|---|
author | Fesperman, Carrie E Evenson, Kelly R Rodríguez, Daniel A Salvesen, David |
author_facet | Fesperman, Carrie E Evenson, Kelly R Rodríguez, Daniel A Salvesen, David |
author_sort | Fesperman, Carrie E |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This study investigates active-transport-to-school initiatives through the Active Living by Design Community Action Model framework. The framework outlines five strategies that influence physical activity: preparation, promotion, programs, policies, and physical projects. METHODS: A comparative case study was conducted to investigate active-transport-to-school initiatives at two North Carolina schools. A group of key stakeholders from each site was interviewed (N = 16), including principals, physical education teachers, public safety officers, city planners, regional transportation planners, city council members, and parent representatives. Content analysis was carried out using NVivo software, and data were evaluated using the framework. RESULTS: Applications designed around all five strategies positively influenced active-transport-to-school programs. Both schools used similar strategies including promotional tactics, policies, and physical projects; however, only one used all five strategies. The scope and duration of these strategies varied by school and ultimately seemed to influence their success. Enablers and challenges to active-transport-to-school programs were identified, including funding, school location, available infrastructure, community involvement, school support, parental buy-in, and sufficient program promotion. CONCLUSION: The quality of the strategies, not their mere presence or use, proved important in active-transport-to-school programs. These results suggest that a multidisciplinary approach that develops promotional materials, resources, school support, and environmental changes to sustain factors that influence parental buy-in will prove critical to the success of future walk-to-school initiatives. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2396992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23969922008-06-18 A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School Fesperman, Carrie E Evenson, Kelly R Rodríguez, Daniel A Salvesen, David Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: This study investigates active-transport-to-school initiatives through the Active Living by Design Community Action Model framework. The framework outlines five strategies that influence physical activity: preparation, promotion, programs, policies, and physical projects. METHODS: A comparative case study was conducted to investigate active-transport-to-school initiatives at two North Carolina schools. A group of key stakeholders from each site was interviewed (N = 16), including principals, physical education teachers, public safety officers, city planners, regional transportation planners, city council members, and parent representatives. Content analysis was carried out using NVivo software, and data were evaluated using the framework. RESULTS: Applications designed around all five strategies positively influenced active-transport-to-school programs. Both schools used similar strategies including promotional tactics, policies, and physical projects; however, only one used all five strategies. The scope and duration of these strategies varied by school and ultimately seemed to influence their success. Enablers and challenges to active-transport-to-school programs were identified, including funding, school location, available infrastructure, community involvement, school support, parental buy-in, and sufficient program promotion. CONCLUSION: The quality of the strategies, not their mere presence or use, proved important in active-transport-to-school programs. These results suggest that a multidisciplinary approach that develops promotional materials, resources, school support, and environmental changes to sustain factors that influence parental buy-in will prove critical to the success of future walk-to-school initiatives. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2008-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2396992/ /pubmed/18341776 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Fesperman, Carrie E Evenson, Kelly R Rodríguez, Daniel A Salvesen, David A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School |
title | A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School |
title_full | A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School |
title_short | A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School |
title_sort | comparative case study on active transport to and from school |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2396992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18341776 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fespermancarriee acomparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool AT evensonkellyr acomparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool AT rodriguezdaniela acomparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool AT salvesendavid acomparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool AT fespermancarriee comparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool AT evensonkellyr comparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool AT rodriguezdaniela comparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool AT salvesendavid comparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool |