Cargando…

A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School

INTRODUCTION: This study investigates active-transport-to-school initiatives through the Active Living by Design Community Action Model framework. The framework outlines five strategies that influence physical activity: preparation, promotion, programs, policies, and physical projects. METHODS: A co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fesperman, Carrie E, Evenson, Kelly R, Rodríguez, Daniel A, Salvesen, David
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2396992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18341776
_version_ 1782155604717993984
author Fesperman, Carrie E
Evenson, Kelly R
Rodríguez, Daniel A
Salvesen, David
author_facet Fesperman, Carrie E
Evenson, Kelly R
Rodríguez, Daniel A
Salvesen, David
author_sort Fesperman, Carrie E
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study investigates active-transport-to-school initiatives through the Active Living by Design Community Action Model framework. The framework outlines five strategies that influence physical activity: preparation, promotion, programs, policies, and physical projects. METHODS: A comparative case study was conducted to investigate active-transport-to-school initiatives at two North Carolina schools. A group of key stakeholders from each site was interviewed (N = 16), including principals, physical education teachers, public safety officers, city planners, regional transportation planners, city council members, and parent representatives. Content analysis was carried out using NVivo software, and data were evaluated using the framework. RESULTS: Applications designed around all five strategies positively influenced active-transport-to-school programs. Both schools used similar strategies including promotional tactics, policies, and physical projects; however, only one used all five strategies. The scope and duration of these strategies varied by school and ultimately seemed to influence their success. Enablers and challenges to active-transport-to-school programs were identified, including funding, school location, available infrastructure, community involvement, school support, parental buy-in, and sufficient program promotion. CONCLUSION: The quality of the strategies, not their mere presence or use, proved important in active-transport-to-school programs. These results suggest that a multidisciplinary approach that develops promotional materials, resources, school support, and environmental changes to sustain factors that influence parental buy-in will prove critical to the success of future walk-to-school initiatives.
format Text
id pubmed-2396992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23969922008-06-18 A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School Fesperman, Carrie E Evenson, Kelly R Rodríguez, Daniel A Salvesen, David Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: This study investigates active-transport-to-school initiatives through the Active Living by Design Community Action Model framework. The framework outlines five strategies that influence physical activity: preparation, promotion, programs, policies, and physical projects. METHODS: A comparative case study was conducted to investigate active-transport-to-school initiatives at two North Carolina schools. A group of key stakeholders from each site was interviewed (N = 16), including principals, physical education teachers, public safety officers, city planners, regional transportation planners, city council members, and parent representatives. Content analysis was carried out using NVivo software, and data were evaluated using the framework. RESULTS: Applications designed around all five strategies positively influenced active-transport-to-school programs. Both schools used similar strategies including promotional tactics, policies, and physical projects; however, only one used all five strategies. The scope and duration of these strategies varied by school and ultimately seemed to influence their success. Enablers and challenges to active-transport-to-school programs were identified, including funding, school location, available infrastructure, community involvement, school support, parental buy-in, and sufficient program promotion. CONCLUSION: The quality of the strategies, not their mere presence or use, proved important in active-transport-to-school programs. These results suggest that a multidisciplinary approach that develops promotional materials, resources, school support, and environmental changes to sustain factors that influence parental buy-in will prove critical to the success of future walk-to-school initiatives. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2008-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2396992/ /pubmed/18341776 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Fesperman, Carrie E
Evenson, Kelly R
Rodríguez, Daniel A
Salvesen, David
A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School
title A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School
title_full A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School
title_fullStr A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School
title_short A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and From School
title_sort comparative case study on active transport to and from school
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2396992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18341776
work_keys_str_mv AT fespermancarriee acomparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool
AT evensonkellyr acomparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool
AT rodriguezdaniela acomparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool
AT salvesendavid acomparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool
AT fespermancarriee comparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool
AT evensonkellyr comparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool
AT rodriguezdaniela comparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool
AT salvesendavid comparativecasestudyonactivetransporttoandfromschool