Cargando…

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: the M.A.K.E. study

BACKGROUND: In the past 30 years karyotyping was the gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aberrations in the fetus. Traditional karyotyping (TKT) has a high accuracy and reliability. However, it is labor intensive, the results take 14–21 days, the costs are high and unwanted findings...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boormans, Elisabeth MA, Birnie, Erwin, Wildschut, Hajo I, Schuring-Blom, Heleen G, Oepkes, Dick, van Oppen, Carla AC, Nijhuis, Jan G, Macville, Merryn VE, Kooper, Angelique JA, Huijsdens, Karin, Hoffer, Mariëtte VJ, Go, Attie, Creemers, Johan, Bhola, Shama L, Bilardo, Katia M, Suijkerbuijk, Ron, Bouman, Katelijne, Galjaard, Robert-Jan H, Bonsel, Gouke J, van Lith, Jan MM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2405770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18492228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-8-18
_version_ 1782155648034668544
author Boormans, Elisabeth MA
Birnie, Erwin
Wildschut, Hajo I
Schuring-Blom, Heleen G
Oepkes, Dick
van Oppen, Carla AC
Nijhuis, Jan G
Macville, Merryn VE
Kooper, Angelique JA
Huijsdens, Karin
Hoffer, Mariëtte VJ
Go, Attie
Creemers, Johan
Bhola, Shama L
Bilardo, Katia M
Suijkerbuijk, Ron
Bouman, Katelijne
Galjaard, Robert-Jan H
Bonsel, Gouke J
van Lith, Jan MM
author_facet Boormans, Elisabeth MA
Birnie, Erwin
Wildschut, Hajo I
Schuring-Blom, Heleen G
Oepkes, Dick
van Oppen, Carla AC
Nijhuis, Jan G
Macville, Merryn VE
Kooper, Angelique JA
Huijsdens, Karin
Hoffer, Mariëtte VJ
Go, Attie
Creemers, Johan
Bhola, Shama L
Bilardo, Katia M
Suijkerbuijk, Ron
Bouman, Katelijne
Galjaard, Robert-Jan H
Bonsel, Gouke J
van Lith, Jan MM
author_sort Boormans, Elisabeth MA
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the past 30 years karyotyping was the gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aberrations in the fetus. Traditional karyotyping (TKT) has a high accuracy and reliability. However, it is labor intensive, the results take 14–21 days, the costs are high and unwanted findings such as abnormalities with unknown clinical relevance are not uncommon. These disadvantages challenged the practice of karyotyping. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is a new molecular genetic technique in prenatal diagnosis. Previous preclinical evidence suggests equivalence of MLPA and traditional karyotyping (TKT) regarding test performance. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is a multicentre diagnostic substitute study among pregnant women, who choose to have amniocentesis for the indication advanced maternal age and/or increased risk following prenatal screening test. In all subjects, both MLPA and karyotyping will be performed on the amniotic fluid sample. The primary outcome is diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes will be maternal quality of life, women's preferences and costs. Analysis will be intention to treat and per protocol analysis. Quality of life analysis will be carried out within the study population. The study aims to include 4500 women. DISCUSSION: The study results are expected to help decide whether MLPA can replace traditional karyotyping for 'low-risk' pregnancies in terms of diagnostic accuracy, quality of life and women's preferences. This will be the first clinical study to report on all relevant aspects of the potential replacement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol is registered in the clinical trial register number ISRCTN47252164
format Text
id pubmed-2405770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24057702008-05-30 Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: the M.A.K.E. study Boormans, Elisabeth MA Birnie, Erwin Wildschut, Hajo I Schuring-Blom, Heleen G Oepkes, Dick van Oppen, Carla AC Nijhuis, Jan G Macville, Merryn VE Kooper, Angelique JA Huijsdens, Karin Hoffer, Mariëtte VJ Go, Attie Creemers, Johan Bhola, Shama L Bilardo, Katia M Suijkerbuijk, Ron Bouman, Katelijne Galjaard, Robert-Jan H Bonsel, Gouke J van Lith, Jan MM BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In the past 30 years karyotyping was the gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aberrations in the fetus. Traditional karyotyping (TKT) has a high accuracy and reliability. However, it is labor intensive, the results take 14–21 days, the costs are high and unwanted findings such as abnormalities with unknown clinical relevance are not uncommon. These disadvantages challenged the practice of karyotyping. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is a new molecular genetic technique in prenatal diagnosis. Previous preclinical evidence suggests equivalence of MLPA and traditional karyotyping (TKT) regarding test performance. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is a multicentre diagnostic substitute study among pregnant women, who choose to have amniocentesis for the indication advanced maternal age and/or increased risk following prenatal screening test. In all subjects, both MLPA and karyotyping will be performed on the amniotic fluid sample. The primary outcome is diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes will be maternal quality of life, women's preferences and costs. Analysis will be intention to treat and per protocol analysis. Quality of life analysis will be carried out within the study population. The study aims to include 4500 women. DISCUSSION: The study results are expected to help decide whether MLPA can replace traditional karyotyping for 'low-risk' pregnancies in terms of diagnostic accuracy, quality of life and women's preferences. This will be the first clinical study to report on all relevant aspects of the potential replacement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol is registered in the clinical trial register number ISRCTN47252164 BioMed Central 2008-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2405770/ /pubmed/18492228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-8-18 Text en Copyright © 2008 Boormans et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Boormans, Elisabeth MA
Birnie, Erwin
Wildschut, Hajo I
Schuring-Blom, Heleen G
Oepkes, Dick
van Oppen, Carla AC
Nijhuis, Jan G
Macville, Merryn VE
Kooper, Angelique JA
Huijsdens, Karin
Hoffer, Mariëtte VJ
Go, Attie
Creemers, Johan
Bhola, Shama L
Bilardo, Katia M
Suijkerbuijk, Ron
Bouman, Katelijne
Galjaard, Robert-Jan H
Bonsel, Gouke J
van Lith, Jan MM
Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: the M.A.K.E. study
title Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: the M.A.K.E. study
title_full Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: the M.A.K.E. study
title_fullStr Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: the M.A.K.E. study
title_full_unstemmed Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: the M.A.K.E. study
title_short Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: the M.A.K.E. study
title_sort multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: the m.a.k.e. study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2405770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18492228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-8-18
work_keys_str_mv AT boormanselisabethma multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT birnieerwin multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT wildschuthajoi multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT schuringblomheleeng multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT oepkesdick multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT vanoppencarlaac multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT nijhuisjang multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT macvillemerrynve multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT kooperangeliqueja multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT huijsdenskarin multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT hoffermariettevj multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT goattie multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT creemersjohan multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT bholashamal multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT bilardokatiam multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT suijkerbuijkron multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT boumankatelijne multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT galjaardrobertjanh multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT bonselgoukej multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy
AT vanlithjanmm multiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationversuskaryotypinginprenataldiagnosisthemakestudy