Cargando…
The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process?
BACKGROUND: Discrepancies between the conclusions of different meta-analyses (quantitative syntheses of systematic reviews) are often ascribed to methodological differences. The objective of this study was to determine the discordance in interpretations when meta-analysts are presented with identica...
Autores principales: | Shrier, Ian, Boivin, Jean-François, Platt, Robert W, Steele, Russell J, Brophy, James M, Carnevale, Franco, Eisenberg, Mark J, Furlan, Andrea, Kakuma, Ritsuko, Macdonald, Mary Ellen, Pilote, Louise, Rossignol, Michel |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2408567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18495019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-8-19 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Interpreting Subjective and Objective Measures of Job Resources: The Importance of Sociodemographic Context
por: Schmitz, Lauren L., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
One-year test-retest reliability of ten vision tests in Canadian athletes
por: Aloosh, Mehdi, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Causal simulation experiments: Lessons from bias amplification
por: Stokes, Tyrel, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The Objective Method of Dream Interpretation
Publicado: (1948) -
Comparison of nested case-control and survival analysis methodologies for analysis of time-dependent exposure
por: Essebag, Vidal, et al.
Publicado: (2005)