Cargando…
New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization
The allocation of funding for new anticancer treatments within the UK has not kept pace with demand. Clinicians find themselves restricted in the use of licensed drugs which they feel are in the best interests of individual patients. Against this, health authorities have a duty to ensure that scarce...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2000
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2408788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11044348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1406 |
_version_ | 1782155706996097024 |
---|---|
author | Ferguson, J S J Summerhayes, M Masters, S Schey, S Smith, I E |
author_facet | Ferguson, J S J Summerhayes, M Masters, S Schey, S Smith, I E |
author_sort | Ferguson, J S J |
collection | PubMed |
description | The allocation of funding for new anticancer treatments within the UK has not kept pace with demand. Clinicians find themselves restricted in the use of licensed drugs which they feel are in the best interests of individual patients. Against this, health authorities have a duty to ensure that scarce resources are used equitably to meet the needs of the local population as a whole. Differential levels of funding for new treatments across the country have led to concerns about rationing by postcode. This paper outlines an approach to the prioritization of new treatment for advanced cancer developed jointly by clinicians and health authorities in South London. The approach involves evidence reviews and consensus meetings. Existing and new treatments are rated on a four-point ‘relative effectiveness scale’, which takes account of the impact of the treatment on quality of life and on survival. The strength of evidence supporting each effectiveness rating is also classified. Health Authorities have used these ratings to determine overall funding levels, while leaving decisions on individual patients to the relevant Trusts. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2408788 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2000 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24087882009-09-10 New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization Ferguson, J S J Summerhayes, M Masters, S Schey, S Smith, I E Br J Cancer Regular Article The allocation of funding for new anticancer treatments within the UK has not kept pace with demand. Clinicians find themselves restricted in the use of licensed drugs which they feel are in the best interests of individual patients. Against this, health authorities have a duty to ensure that scarce resources are used equitably to meet the needs of the local population as a whole. Differential levels of funding for new treatments across the country have led to concerns about rationing by postcode. This paper outlines an approach to the prioritization of new treatment for advanced cancer developed jointly by clinicians and health authorities in South London. The approach involves evidence reviews and consensus meetings. Existing and new treatments are rated on a four-point ‘relative effectiveness scale’, which takes account of the impact of the treatment on quality of life and on survival. The strength of evidence supporting each effectiveness rating is also classified. Health Authorities have used these ratings to determine overall funding levels, while leaving decisions on individual patients to the relevant Trusts. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign Nature Publishing Group 2000-11 2000-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2408788/ /pubmed/11044348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1406 Text en Copyright © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Ferguson, J S J Summerhayes, M Masters, S Schey, S Smith, I E New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization |
title | New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization |
title_full | New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization |
title_fullStr | New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization |
title_full_unstemmed | New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization |
title_short | New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization |
title_sort | new treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2408788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11044348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1406 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fergusonjsj newtreatmentsforadvancedcanceranapproachtoprioritization AT summerhayesm newtreatmentsforadvancedcanceranapproachtoprioritization AT masterss newtreatmentsforadvancedcanceranapproachtoprioritization AT scheys newtreatmentsforadvancedcanceranapproachtoprioritization AT smithie newtreatmentsforadvancedcanceranapproachtoprioritization |