Cargando…

New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization

The allocation of funding for new anticancer treatments within the UK has not kept pace with demand. Clinicians find themselves restricted in the use of licensed drugs which they feel are in the best interests of individual patients. Against this, health authorities have a duty to ensure that scarce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferguson, J S J, Summerhayes, M, Masters, S, Schey, S, Smith, I E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2408788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11044348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1406
_version_ 1782155706996097024
author Ferguson, J S J
Summerhayes, M
Masters, S
Schey, S
Smith, I E
author_facet Ferguson, J S J
Summerhayes, M
Masters, S
Schey, S
Smith, I E
author_sort Ferguson, J S J
collection PubMed
description The allocation of funding for new anticancer treatments within the UK has not kept pace with demand. Clinicians find themselves restricted in the use of licensed drugs which they feel are in the best interests of individual patients. Against this, health authorities have a duty to ensure that scarce resources are used equitably to meet the needs of the local population as a whole. Differential levels of funding for new treatments across the country have led to concerns about rationing by postcode. This paper outlines an approach to the prioritization of new treatment for advanced cancer developed jointly by clinicians and health authorities in South London. The approach involves evidence reviews and consensus meetings. Existing and new treatments are rated on a four-point ‘relative effectiveness scale’, which takes account of the impact of the treatment on quality of life and on survival. The strength of evidence supporting each effectiveness rating is also classified. Health Authorities have used these ratings to determine overall funding levels, while leaving decisions on individual patients to the relevant Trusts. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign
format Text
id pubmed-2408788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2000
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24087882009-09-10 New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization Ferguson, J S J Summerhayes, M Masters, S Schey, S Smith, I E Br J Cancer Regular Article The allocation of funding for new anticancer treatments within the UK has not kept pace with demand. Clinicians find themselves restricted in the use of licensed drugs which they feel are in the best interests of individual patients. Against this, health authorities have a duty to ensure that scarce resources are used equitably to meet the needs of the local population as a whole. Differential levels of funding for new treatments across the country have led to concerns about rationing by postcode. This paper outlines an approach to the prioritization of new treatment for advanced cancer developed jointly by clinicians and health authorities in South London. The approach involves evidence reviews and consensus meetings. Existing and new treatments are rated on a four-point ‘relative effectiveness scale’, which takes account of the impact of the treatment on quality of life and on survival. The strength of evidence supporting each effectiveness rating is also classified. Health Authorities have used these ratings to determine overall funding levels, while leaving decisions on individual patients to the relevant Trusts. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign Nature Publishing Group 2000-11 2000-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2408788/ /pubmed/11044348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1406 Text en Copyright © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Ferguson, J S J
Summerhayes, M
Masters, S
Schey, S
Smith, I E
New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization
title New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization
title_full New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization
title_fullStr New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization
title_full_unstemmed New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization
title_short New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization
title_sort new treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2408788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11044348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1406
work_keys_str_mv AT fergusonjsj newtreatmentsforadvancedcanceranapproachtoprioritization
AT summerhayesm newtreatmentsforadvancedcanceranapproachtoprioritization
AT masterss newtreatmentsforadvancedcanceranapproachtoprioritization
AT scheys newtreatmentsforadvancedcanceranapproachtoprioritization
AT smithie newtreatmentsforadvancedcanceranapproachtoprioritization