Cargando…

Pregnancy postponement and childlessness leads to chronic hypervascularity of the breasts and cancer risk

Epidemiologists have established that women with small families, and particularly nulliparae, are prone to develop breast cancer later in life. We report that physiological mammary hypervascularity may be an intermediate reason against the background that breast-core vascularity is normal in pregnan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simpson, H W, McArdle, C S, George, W D, Griffiths, K, Turkes, A, Pauson, A W
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2408917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12439713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600600
Descripción
Sumario:Epidemiologists have established that women with small families, and particularly nulliparae, are prone to develop breast cancer later in life. We report that physiological mammary hypervascularity may be an intermediate reason against the background that breast-core vascularity is normal in pregnancy but pathological in the vascularisation of cancer. We examined breast ‘core’ vascularity in nulliparae during their potential reproductive life and in parous women after their last birth but before their menopause. Fifty clinically normal pre-menopausal non-pregnant women (100 breasts) were studied daily for one ‘luteal positive’ menstrual cycle. Their parity history varied from zero to five babies. Under controlled domestic conditions each wore a special electronic thermometric bra to automatically record breast ‘core’ temperature changes as a measure of mammary tissue blood flow. In the nulliparae there was a rise of breast vascularity throughout reproductive life. In the parous women, a year or so after each birth, breast vascularity was reset at a lower level than before the pregnancy; thereafter, as in nulliparae, there was progressive increase in mammary vascularity until the menopause. British Journal of Cancer (2002) 87, 1246–1252. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600600 www.bjcancer.com © 2002 Cancer Research UK