Cargando…
The efficacy of 'Radio guided Occult Lesion Localization' (ROLL) versus 'Wire-guided Localization' (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial – ROLL study
BACKGROUND: With the increasing number of non palpable breast carcinomas, the need of a good and reliable localization method increases. Currently the wire guided localization (WGL) is the standard of care in most countries. Radio guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) is a new technique that may...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18495027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-9 |
_version_ | 1782155740391145472 |
---|---|
author | van Esser, Stijn Hobbelink, Monique GG Peeters, Petra HM Buskens, Erik van der Ploeg, Iris M Mali, Willem PTHM Rinkes, Inne H M Borel van Hillegersberg, Richard |
author_facet | van Esser, Stijn Hobbelink, Monique GG Peeters, Petra HM Buskens, Erik van der Ploeg, Iris M Mali, Willem PTHM Rinkes, Inne H M Borel van Hillegersberg, Richard |
author_sort | van Esser, Stijn |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the increasing number of non palpable breast carcinomas, the need of a good and reliable localization method increases. Currently the wire guided localization (WGL) is the standard of care in most countries. Radio guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) is a new technique that may improve the oncological outcome, cost effectiveness, patient comfort and cosmetic outcome. However, the studies published hitherto are of poor quality providing less than convincing evidence to change the current standard of care. The aim of this study is to compare the ROLL technique with the standard of care (WGL) regarding the percentage of tumour free margins, cost effectiveness, patient comfort and cosmetic outcome. METHODS/DESIGN: The ROLL trial is a multi center randomized clinical trial. Over a period of 2–3 years 316 patients will be randomized between the ROLL and the WGL technique. With this number, the expected 15% difference in tumour free margins can be detected with a power of 80%. Other endpoints include cosmetic outcome, cost effectiveness, patient (dis)comfort, degree of difficulty of the procedures and the success rate of the sentinel node procedure. The rationale, study design and planned analyses are described. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (, study protocol number NCT00539474) |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2409294 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24092942008-06-04 The efficacy of 'Radio guided Occult Lesion Localization' (ROLL) versus 'Wire-guided Localization' (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial – ROLL study van Esser, Stijn Hobbelink, Monique GG Peeters, Petra HM Buskens, Erik van der Ploeg, Iris M Mali, Willem PTHM Rinkes, Inne H M Borel van Hillegersberg, Richard BMC Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: With the increasing number of non palpable breast carcinomas, the need of a good and reliable localization method increases. Currently the wire guided localization (WGL) is the standard of care in most countries. Radio guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) is a new technique that may improve the oncological outcome, cost effectiveness, patient comfort and cosmetic outcome. However, the studies published hitherto are of poor quality providing less than convincing evidence to change the current standard of care. The aim of this study is to compare the ROLL technique with the standard of care (WGL) regarding the percentage of tumour free margins, cost effectiveness, patient comfort and cosmetic outcome. METHODS/DESIGN: The ROLL trial is a multi center randomized clinical trial. Over a period of 2–3 years 316 patients will be randomized between the ROLL and the WGL technique. With this number, the expected 15% difference in tumour free margins can be detected with a power of 80%. Other endpoints include cosmetic outcome, cost effectiveness, patient (dis)comfort, degree of difficulty of the procedures and the success rate of the sentinel node procedure. The rationale, study design and planned analyses are described. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (, study protocol number NCT00539474) BioMed Central 2008-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2409294/ /pubmed/18495027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-9 Text en Copyright © 2008 van Esser et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol van Esser, Stijn Hobbelink, Monique GG Peeters, Petra HM Buskens, Erik van der Ploeg, Iris M Mali, Willem PTHM Rinkes, Inne H M Borel van Hillegersberg, Richard The efficacy of 'Radio guided Occult Lesion Localization' (ROLL) versus 'Wire-guided Localization' (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial – ROLL study |
title | The efficacy of 'Radio guided Occult Lesion Localization' (ROLL) versus 'Wire-guided Localization' (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial – ROLL study |
title_full | The efficacy of 'Radio guided Occult Lesion Localization' (ROLL) versus 'Wire-guided Localization' (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial – ROLL study |
title_fullStr | The efficacy of 'Radio guided Occult Lesion Localization' (ROLL) versus 'Wire-guided Localization' (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial – ROLL study |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of 'Radio guided Occult Lesion Localization' (ROLL) versus 'Wire-guided Localization' (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial – ROLL study |
title_short | The efficacy of 'Radio guided Occult Lesion Localization' (ROLL) versus 'Wire-guided Localization' (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial – ROLL study |
title_sort | efficacy of 'radio guided occult lesion localization' (roll) versus 'wire-guided localization' (wgl) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial – roll study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18495027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanesserstijn theefficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy AT hobbelinkmoniquegg theefficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy AT peeterspetrahm theefficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy AT buskenserik theefficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy AT vanderploegirism theefficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy AT maliwillempthm theefficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy AT rinkesinnehmborel theefficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy AT vanhillegersbergrichard theefficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy AT vanesserstijn efficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy AT hobbelinkmoniquegg efficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy AT peeterspetrahm efficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy AT buskenserik efficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy AT vanderploegirism efficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy AT maliwillempthm efficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy AT rinkesinnehmborel efficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy AT vanhillegersbergrichard efficacyofradioguidedoccultlesionlocalizationrollversuswireguidedlocalizationwglinbreastconservingsurgeryfornonpalpablebreastcancerarandomizedclinicaltrialrollstudy |