Cargando…

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in gynecological cancers: a critical review of the literature

Although it does not have a long history of sentinel node evaluation (SLN) in female genital system cancers, there is a growing number of promising study results, despite the presence of some aspects that need to be considered and developed. It has been most commonly used in vulvar and uterine cervi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayhan, Ali, Celik, Husnu, Dursun, Polat
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18492253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-6-53
_version_ 1782155752088010752
author Ayhan, Ali
Celik, Husnu
Dursun, Polat
author_facet Ayhan, Ali
Celik, Husnu
Dursun, Polat
author_sort Ayhan, Ali
collection PubMed
description Although it does not have a long history of sentinel node evaluation (SLN) in female genital system cancers, there is a growing number of promising study results, despite the presence of some aspects that need to be considered and developed. It has been most commonly used in vulvar and uterine cervivcal cancer in gynecological oncology. According to these studies, almost all of which are prospective, particularly in cases where Technetium-labeled nanocolloid is used, sentinel node detection rate sensitivity and specificity has been reported to be 100%, except for a few cases. In the studies on cervical cancer, sentinel node detection rates have been reported around 80–86%, a little lower than those in vulva cancer, and negative predictive value has been reported about 99%. It is relatively new in endometrial cancer, where its detection rate varies between 50 and 80%. Studies about vulvar melanoma and vaginal cancers are generally case reports. Although it has not been supported with multicenter randomized and controlled studies including larger case series, study results reported by various centers around the world are harmonious and mutually supportive particularly in vulva cancer, and cervix cancer. Even though it does not seem possible to replace the traditional approaches in these two cancers, it is still a serious alternative for the future. We believe that it is important to increase and support the studies that will strengthen the weaknesses of the method, among which there are detection of micrometastases and increasing detection rates, and render it usable in routine clinical practice.
format Text
id pubmed-2409335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24093352008-06-04 Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in gynecological cancers: a critical review of the literature Ayhan, Ali Celik, Husnu Dursun, Polat World J Surg Oncol Review Although it does not have a long history of sentinel node evaluation (SLN) in female genital system cancers, there is a growing number of promising study results, despite the presence of some aspects that need to be considered and developed. It has been most commonly used in vulvar and uterine cervivcal cancer in gynecological oncology. According to these studies, almost all of which are prospective, particularly in cases where Technetium-labeled nanocolloid is used, sentinel node detection rate sensitivity and specificity has been reported to be 100%, except for a few cases. In the studies on cervical cancer, sentinel node detection rates have been reported around 80–86%, a little lower than those in vulva cancer, and negative predictive value has been reported about 99%. It is relatively new in endometrial cancer, where its detection rate varies between 50 and 80%. Studies about vulvar melanoma and vaginal cancers are generally case reports. Although it has not been supported with multicenter randomized and controlled studies including larger case series, study results reported by various centers around the world are harmonious and mutually supportive particularly in vulva cancer, and cervix cancer. Even though it does not seem possible to replace the traditional approaches in these two cancers, it is still a serious alternative for the future. We believe that it is important to increase and support the studies that will strengthen the weaknesses of the method, among which there are detection of micrometastases and increasing detection rates, and render it usable in routine clinical practice. BioMed Central 2008-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2409335/ /pubmed/18492253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-6-53 Text en Copyright © 2008 Ayhan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Ayhan, Ali
Celik, Husnu
Dursun, Polat
Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in gynecological cancers: a critical review of the literature
title Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in gynecological cancers: a critical review of the literature
title_full Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in gynecological cancers: a critical review of the literature
title_fullStr Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in gynecological cancers: a critical review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in gynecological cancers: a critical review of the literature
title_short Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in gynecological cancers: a critical review of the literature
title_sort lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in gynecological cancers: a critical review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18492253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-6-53
work_keys_str_mv AT ayhanali lymphaticmappingandsentinelnodebiopsyingynecologicalcancersacriticalreviewoftheliterature
AT celikhusnu lymphaticmappingandsentinelnodebiopsyingynecologicalcancersacriticalreviewoftheliterature
AT dursunpolat lymphaticmappingandsentinelnodebiopsyingynecologicalcancersacriticalreviewoftheliterature