Cargando…

Spatial encoding in spinal sensorimotor circuits differs in different wild type mice strains

BACKGROUND: Previous studies in the rat have shown that the spatial organisation of the receptive fields of nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) system are functionally adapted through experience dependent mechanisms, termed somatosensory imprinting, during postnatal development. Here we wanted to cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thelin, Jonas, Schouenborg, Jens
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18495020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-45
_version_ 1782155758029242368
author Thelin, Jonas
Schouenborg, Jens
author_facet Thelin, Jonas
Schouenborg, Jens
author_sort Thelin, Jonas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies in the rat have shown that the spatial organisation of the receptive fields of nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) system are functionally adapted through experience dependent mechanisms, termed somatosensory imprinting, during postnatal development. Here we wanted to clarify 1) if mice exhibit a similar spatial encoding of sensory input to NWR as previously found in the rat and 2) if mice strains with a poor learning capacity in various behavioural tests, associated with deficient long term potention, also exhibit poor adaptation of NWR. The organisation of the NWR system in two adult wild type mouse strains with normal long term potentiation (LTP) in hippocampus and two adult wild type mouse strains exhibiting deficiencies in corresponding LTP were used and compared to previous results in the rat. Receptive fields of reflexes in single hindlimb muscles were mapped with CO(2 )laser heat pulses. RESULTS: While the spatial organisation of the nociceptive receptive fields in mice with normal LTP were very similar to those in rats, the LTP impaired strains exhibited receptive fields of NWRs with aberrant sensitivity distributions. However, no difference was found in NWR thresholds or onset C-fibre latencies suggesting that the mechanisms determining general reflex sensitivity and somatosensory imprinting are different. CONCLUSION: Our results thus confirm that sensory encoding in mice and rat NWR is similar, provided that mice strains with a good learning capability are studied and raise the possibility that LTP like mechanisms are involved in somatosensory imprinting.
format Text
id pubmed-2409357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24093572008-06-04 Spatial encoding in spinal sensorimotor circuits differs in different wild type mice strains Thelin, Jonas Schouenborg, Jens BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies in the rat have shown that the spatial organisation of the receptive fields of nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) system are functionally adapted through experience dependent mechanisms, termed somatosensory imprinting, during postnatal development. Here we wanted to clarify 1) if mice exhibit a similar spatial encoding of sensory input to NWR as previously found in the rat and 2) if mice strains with a poor learning capacity in various behavioural tests, associated with deficient long term potention, also exhibit poor adaptation of NWR. The organisation of the NWR system in two adult wild type mouse strains with normal long term potentiation (LTP) in hippocampus and two adult wild type mouse strains exhibiting deficiencies in corresponding LTP were used and compared to previous results in the rat. Receptive fields of reflexes in single hindlimb muscles were mapped with CO(2 )laser heat pulses. RESULTS: While the spatial organisation of the nociceptive receptive fields in mice with normal LTP were very similar to those in rats, the LTP impaired strains exhibited receptive fields of NWRs with aberrant sensitivity distributions. However, no difference was found in NWR thresholds or onset C-fibre latencies suggesting that the mechanisms determining general reflex sensitivity and somatosensory imprinting are different. CONCLUSION: Our results thus confirm that sensory encoding in mice and rat NWR is similar, provided that mice strains with a good learning capability are studied and raise the possibility that LTP like mechanisms are involved in somatosensory imprinting. BioMed Central 2008-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2409357/ /pubmed/18495020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-45 Text en Copyright © 2008 Thelin and Schouenborg; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thelin, Jonas
Schouenborg, Jens
Spatial encoding in spinal sensorimotor circuits differs in different wild type mice strains
title Spatial encoding in spinal sensorimotor circuits differs in different wild type mice strains
title_full Spatial encoding in spinal sensorimotor circuits differs in different wild type mice strains
title_fullStr Spatial encoding in spinal sensorimotor circuits differs in different wild type mice strains
title_full_unstemmed Spatial encoding in spinal sensorimotor circuits differs in different wild type mice strains
title_short Spatial encoding in spinal sensorimotor circuits differs in different wild type mice strains
title_sort spatial encoding in spinal sensorimotor circuits differs in different wild type mice strains
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18495020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-45
work_keys_str_mv AT thelinjonas spatialencodinginspinalsensorimotorcircuitsdiffersindifferentwildtypemicestrains
AT schouenborgjens spatialencodinginspinalsensorimotorcircuitsdiffersindifferentwildtypemicestrains