Cargando…
Prospective comparison of D1 vs modified D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma
To compare the outcomes after D1 gastrectomy with those after modified D2 gastrectomy (preserving pancreas and spleen) performed by specialist surgeons for gastric cancer in a large UK NHS Trust. In all, 118 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were referred by postcode, to undergo eithe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15138467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601790 |
_version_ | 1782155772783755264 |
---|---|
author | Edwards, P Blackshaw, G R J C Lewis, W G Barry, J D Allison, M C Jones, D R B |
author_facet | Edwards, P Blackshaw, G R J C Lewis, W G Barry, J D Allison, M C Jones, D R B |
author_sort | Edwards, P |
collection | PubMed |
description | To compare the outcomes after D1 gastrectomy with those after modified D2 gastrectomy (preserving pancreas and spleen) performed by specialist surgeons for gastric cancer in a large UK NHS Trust. In all, 118 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were referred by postcode, to undergo either a D1 gastrectomy (North Gwent (RJ), n=36, median age 76 years, 21 m) or a modified D2 gastrectomy (South Gwent (WL), n=82, 70 years, 57 m). Operative mortality in the two groups of patients was similar (D1 8.3% vs D2 7.3%, χ(2) 0.286, DF 1, P=0.593). Overall cumulative survival at 5 years was 32% after D1 gastrectomy compared to 59% after D2 gastrectomy (χ(2) 4.25, DF 1, P=0.0392). In patients with stage III cancers, survival was 8% after D1, compared with 33% after D2 gastrectomy (χ(2) 6.43, DF 1, P=0.0112). In a multivariate analysis, T stage (hazard ratio 2.339, 95% CI 1.683–2.995, P=0.01), N stage (hazard ratio 4.026, 95% CI 3.536–4.516, P=0.0001) and the extent of lymphadenectomy (hazard ratio 0.258, 95% CI –0.426–0.942, P=0.0001) were independently associated with durations of survival. In conclusion, modified D2 gastrectomy can improve survival four-fold for patients with stage III gastric cancer, without significantly increasing morbidity and mortality when compared with a D1 gastrectomy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2409472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24094722009-09-10 Prospective comparison of D1 vs modified D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma Edwards, P Blackshaw, G R J C Lewis, W G Barry, J D Allison, M C Jones, D R B Br J Cancer Clinical To compare the outcomes after D1 gastrectomy with those after modified D2 gastrectomy (preserving pancreas and spleen) performed by specialist surgeons for gastric cancer in a large UK NHS Trust. In all, 118 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were referred by postcode, to undergo either a D1 gastrectomy (North Gwent (RJ), n=36, median age 76 years, 21 m) or a modified D2 gastrectomy (South Gwent (WL), n=82, 70 years, 57 m). Operative mortality in the two groups of patients was similar (D1 8.3% vs D2 7.3%, χ(2) 0.286, DF 1, P=0.593). Overall cumulative survival at 5 years was 32% after D1 gastrectomy compared to 59% after D2 gastrectomy (χ(2) 4.25, DF 1, P=0.0392). In patients with stage III cancers, survival was 8% after D1, compared with 33% after D2 gastrectomy (χ(2) 6.43, DF 1, P=0.0112). In a multivariate analysis, T stage (hazard ratio 2.339, 95% CI 1.683–2.995, P=0.01), N stage (hazard ratio 4.026, 95% CI 3.536–4.516, P=0.0001) and the extent of lymphadenectomy (hazard ratio 0.258, 95% CI –0.426–0.942, P=0.0001) were independently associated with durations of survival. In conclusion, modified D2 gastrectomy can improve survival four-fold for patients with stage III gastric cancer, without significantly increasing morbidity and mortality when compared with a D1 gastrectomy. Nature Publishing Group 2004-05-17 2004-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2409472/ /pubmed/15138467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601790 Text en Copyright © 2004 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Edwards, P Blackshaw, G R J C Lewis, W G Barry, J D Allison, M C Jones, D R B Prospective comparison of D1 vs modified D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma |
title | Prospective comparison of D1 vs modified D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma |
title_full | Prospective comparison of D1 vs modified D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Prospective comparison of D1 vs modified D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective comparison of D1 vs modified D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma |
title_short | Prospective comparison of D1 vs modified D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma |
title_sort | prospective comparison of d1 vs modified d2 gastrectomy for carcinoma |
topic | Clinical |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15138467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601790 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edwardsp prospectivecomparisonofd1vsmodifiedd2gastrectomyforcarcinoma AT blackshawgrjc prospectivecomparisonofd1vsmodifiedd2gastrectomyforcarcinoma AT lewiswg prospectivecomparisonofd1vsmodifiedd2gastrectomyforcarcinoma AT barryjd prospectivecomparisonofd1vsmodifiedd2gastrectomyforcarcinoma AT allisonmc prospectivecomparisonofd1vsmodifiedd2gastrectomyforcarcinoma AT jonesdrb prospectivecomparisonofd1vsmodifiedd2gastrectomyforcarcinoma |