Cargando…

Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: monitoring tumour shrinkage and molecular profile on magnetic resonance and assessment of 3-year outcome

The objective of this study is to assess tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer using magnetic resonance (MR) to monitor tumour volume and changes in molecular profile and to compare the survival to that of a control group. Eligibility included S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: deSouza, N M, Soutter, W P, Rustin, G, Mahon, M M, Jones, B, Dina, R, McIndoe, G A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15162152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601870
_version_ 1782155786396368896
author deSouza, N M
Soutter, W P
Rustin, G
Mahon, M M
Jones, B
Dina, R
McIndoe, G A
author_facet deSouza, N M
Soutter, W P
Rustin, G
Mahon, M M
Jones, B
Dina, R
McIndoe, G A
author_sort deSouza, N M
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study is to assess tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer using magnetic resonance (MR) to monitor tumour volume and changes in molecular profile and to compare the survival to that of a control group. Eligibility included Stage Ib–IIb previously untreated cervical tumours >10 cm(3). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 22 patients (methotrexate 300 mg m(−2) (with folinic acid rescue), bleomycin 30 mg m(−2), cisplatin 60 mg m(−2)) was repeated twice weekly for three courses and followed by radical hysterectomy. Post-operative radiotherapy was given in 14 cases. A total of 23 patients treated either with radical surgery or chemoradiotherapy over the same time period comprised the nonrandomised control group. MR scans before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and in the control group documented tumour volume on imaging and metabolites on in vivo spectroscopy. Changes were compared using a paired t-test. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. There were no significant differences between the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and control groups in age (mean, s.d. 43.3±10, 44.7±8.5 years, respectively, P=0.63) or tumour volume (medians, quartiles 35.8, 17.8, 57.7 cm(3) vs 23.0, 15.0, 37.0 cm(3), respectively, P=0.068). The reduction in tumour volume post-chemotherapy (median, quartiles 7.5, 3.0, 19.0 cm(3)) was significant (P=0.002). The reduction in –CH(2) triglyceride approached significance (P=0.05), but other metabolites were unchanged. The 3-year survival in the chemotherapy group (49.1%) was not significantly different from the control group (46%, P=0.94). There is a significant reduction in tumour volume and –CH(2) triglyceride levels after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but there is no survival advantage.
format Text
id pubmed-2409522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24095222009-09-10 Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: monitoring tumour shrinkage and molecular profile on magnetic resonance and assessment of 3-year outcome deSouza, N M Soutter, W P Rustin, G Mahon, M M Jones, B Dina, R McIndoe, G A Br J Cancer Clinical The objective of this study is to assess tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer using magnetic resonance (MR) to monitor tumour volume and changes in molecular profile and to compare the survival to that of a control group. Eligibility included Stage Ib–IIb previously untreated cervical tumours >10 cm(3). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 22 patients (methotrexate 300 mg m(−2) (with folinic acid rescue), bleomycin 30 mg m(−2), cisplatin 60 mg m(−2)) was repeated twice weekly for three courses and followed by radical hysterectomy. Post-operative radiotherapy was given in 14 cases. A total of 23 patients treated either with radical surgery or chemoradiotherapy over the same time period comprised the nonrandomised control group. MR scans before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and in the control group documented tumour volume on imaging and metabolites on in vivo spectroscopy. Changes were compared using a paired t-test. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. There were no significant differences between the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and control groups in age (mean, s.d. 43.3±10, 44.7±8.5 years, respectively, P=0.63) or tumour volume (medians, quartiles 35.8, 17.8, 57.7 cm(3) vs 23.0, 15.0, 37.0 cm(3), respectively, P=0.068). The reduction in tumour volume post-chemotherapy (median, quartiles 7.5, 3.0, 19.0 cm(3)) was significant (P=0.002). The reduction in –CH(2) triglyceride approached significance (P=0.05), but other metabolites were unchanged. The 3-year survival in the chemotherapy group (49.1%) was not significantly different from the control group (46%, P=0.94). There is a significant reduction in tumour volume and –CH(2) triglyceride levels after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but there is no survival advantage. Nature Publishing Group 2004-06-14 2004-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2409522/ /pubmed/15162152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601870 Text en Copyright © 2004 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical
deSouza, N M
Soutter, W P
Rustin, G
Mahon, M M
Jones, B
Dina, R
McIndoe, G A
Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: monitoring tumour shrinkage and molecular profile on magnetic resonance and assessment of 3-year outcome
title Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: monitoring tumour shrinkage and molecular profile on magnetic resonance and assessment of 3-year outcome
title_full Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: monitoring tumour shrinkage and molecular profile on magnetic resonance and assessment of 3-year outcome
title_fullStr Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: monitoring tumour shrinkage and molecular profile on magnetic resonance and assessment of 3-year outcome
title_full_unstemmed Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: monitoring tumour shrinkage and molecular profile on magnetic resonance and assessment of 3-year outcome
title_short Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: monitoring tumour shrinkage and molecular profile on magnetic resonance and assessment of 3-year outcome
title_sort use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: monitoring tumour shrinkage and molecular profile on magnetic resonance and assessment of 3-year outcome
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15162152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601870
work_keys_str_mv AT desouzanm useofneoadjuvantchemotherapypriortoradicalhysterectomyincervicalcancermonitoringtumourshrinkageandmolecularprofileonmagneticresonanceandassessmentof3yearoutcome
AT soutterwp useofneoadjuvantchemotherapypriortoradicalhysterectomyincervicalcancermonitoringtumourshrinkageandmolecularprofileonmagneticresonanceandassessmentof3yearoutcome
AT rusting useofneoadjuvantchemotherapypriortoradicalhysterectomyincervicalcancermonitoringtumourshrinkageandmolecularprofileonmagneticresonanceandassessmentof3yearoutcome
AT mahonmm useofneoadjuvantchemotherapypriortoradicalhysterectomyincervicalcancermonitoringtumourshrinkageandmolecularprofileonmagneticresonanceandassessmentof3yearoutcome
AT jonesb useofneoadjuvantchemotherapypriortoradicalhysterectomyincervicalcancermonitoringtumourshrinkageandmolecularprofileonmagneticresonanceandassessmentof3yearoutcome
AT dinar useofneoadjuvantchemotherapypriortoradicalhysterectomyincervicalcancermonitoringtumourshrinkageandmolecularprofileonmagneticresonanceandassessmentof3yearoutcome
AT mcindoega useofneoadjuvantchemotherapypriortoradicalhysterectomyincervicalcancermonitoringtumourshrinkageandmolecularprofileonmagneticresonanceandassessmentof3yearoutcome