Cargando…

Do CA125 response criteria overestimate tumour response in second-line treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma?

Recent studies indicate that cancer antigen 125 (CA125) response criteria tend to overestimate a tumour reduction measured by standard WHO response criteria in recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The aim of the study was to validate the recently introduced GCIG (The Gynaecological Cancer Intergr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gronlund, B, Hansen, H H, Høgdall, C, Høgdall, E V S, Engelholm, S A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14735180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601501
_version_ 1782155801370034176
author Gronlund, B
Hansen, H H
Høgdall, C
Høgdall, E V S
Engelholm, S A
author_facet Gronlund, B
Hansen, H H
Høgdall, C
Høgdall, E V S
Engelholm, S A
author_sort Gronlund, B
collection PubMed
description Recent studies indicate that cancer antigen 125 (CA125) response criteria tend to overestimate a tumour reduction measured by standard WHO response criteria in recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The aim of the study was to validate the recently introduced GCIG (The Gynaecological Cancer Intergroup) CA125 response criteria in predicting a tumour response measured by WHO (World Health Organization) criteria. Changes in CA125 levels (GCIG criteria) were retrospectively compared with alterations in the tumour load (WHO criteria) during second-line chemotherapy with topotecan or paclitaxel–platinum in 124 consecutive patients with recurrent or refractory disease. In patients assessable by both response criteria (n=72), the overall response rate using GCIG CA125 criteria was 57% (95% confidence interval (CI): 45–69%) and significantly higher than the response rate of 39% (95% CI: 28–51%) using WHO response criteria (P=0.045). The GCIG CA125 criteria had a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI: 82–100%), a specificity of 68% (95% CI: 52–81%) and an accuracy of 79% (95% CI: 68–88%) in predicting a response measured by WHO criteria. In conclusion, the GCIG CA125 response criteria seem to overestimate a tumour response by WHO criteria when monitoring the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy with topotecan or paclitaxel–platinum in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma.
format Text
id pubmed-2409573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24095732009-09-10 Do CA125 response criteria overestimate tumour response in second-line treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma? Gronlund, B Hansen, H H Høgdall, C Høgdall, E V S Engelholm, S A Br J Cancer Clinical Recent studies indicate that cancer antigen 125 (CA125) response criteria tend to overestimate a tumour reduction measured by standard WHO response criteria in recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The aim of the study was to validate the recently introduced GCIG (The Gynaecological Cancer Intergroup) CA125 response criteria in predicting a tumour response measured by WHO (World Health Organization) criteria. Changes in CA125 levels (GCIG criteria) were retrospectively compared with alterations in the tumour load (WHO criteria) during second-line chemotherapy with topotecan or paclitaxel–platinum in 124 consecutive patients with recurrent or refractory disease. In patients assessable by both response criteria (n=72), the overall response rate using GCIG CA125 criteria was 57% (95% confidence interval (CI): 45–69%) and significantly higher than the response rate of 39% (95% CI: 28–51%) using WHO response criteria (P=0.045). The GCIG CA125 criteria had a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI: 82–100%), a specificity of 68% (95% CI: 52–81%) and an accuracy of 79% (95% CI: 68–88%) in predicting a response measured by WHO criteria. In conclusion, the GCIG CA125 response criteria seem to overestimate a tumour response by WHO criteria when monitoring the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy with topotecan or paclitaxel–platinum in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Nature Publishing Group 2004-01-26 2004-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2409573/ /pubmed/14735180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601501 Text en Copyright © 2004 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical
Gronlund, B
Hansen, H H
Høgdall, C
Høgdall, E V S
Engelholm, S A
Do CA125 response criteria overestimate tumour response in second-line treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma?
title Do CA125 response criteria overestimate tumour response in second-line treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma?
title_full Do CA125 response criteria overestimate tumour response in second-line treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma?
title_fullStr Do CA125 response criteria overestimate tumour response in second-line treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma?
title_full_unstemmed Do CA125 response criteria overestimate tumour response in second-line treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma?
title_short Do CA125 response criteria overestimate tumour response in second-line treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma?
title_sort do ca125 response criteria overestimate tumour response in second-line treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma?
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14735180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601501
work_keys_str_mv AT gronlundb doca125responsecriteriaoverestimatetumourresponseinsecondlinetreatmentofepithelialovariancarcinoma
AT hansenhh doca125responsecriteriaoverestimatetumourresponseinsecondlinetreatmentofepithelialovariancarcinoma
AT høgdallc doca125responsecriteriaoverestimatetumourresponseinsecondlinetreatmentofepithelialovariancarcinoma
AT høgdallevs doca125responsecriteriaoverestimatetumourresponseinsecondlinetreatmentofepithelialovariancarcinoma
AT engelholmsa doca125responsecriteriaoverestimatetumourresponseinsecondlinetreatmentofepithelialovariancarcinoma