Cargando…

Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials

This study evaluates the efficacy of capecitabine using data from a large, well-characterised population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated in two identically designed phase III studies. A total of 1207 patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomised to either oral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cutsem, E Van, Hoff, P M, Harper, P, Bukowski, R M, Cunningham, D, Dufour, P, Graeven, U, Lokich, J, Madajewicz, S, Maroun, J A, Marshall, J L, Mitchell, E P, Perez-Manga, G, Rougier, P, Schmiegel, W, Schoelmerich, J, Sobrero, A, Schilsky, R L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15026800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601676
_version_ 1782155819601625088
author Cutsem, E Van
Hoff, P M
Harper, P
Bukowski, R M
Cunningham, D
Dufour, P
Graeven, U
Lokich, J
Madajewicz, S
Maroun, J A
Marshall, J L
Mitchell, E P
Perez-Manga, G
Rougier, P
Schmiegel, W
Schoelmerich, J
Sobrero, A
Schilsky, R L
author_facet Cutsem, E Van
Hoff, P M
Harper, P
Bukowski, R M
Cunningham, D
Dufour, P
Graeven, U
Lokich, J
Madajewicz, S
Maroun, J A
Marshall, J L
Mitchell, E P
Perez-Manga, G
Rougier, P
Schmiegel, W
Schoelmerich, J
Sobrero, A
Schilsky, R L
author_sort Cutsem, E Van
collection PubMed
description This study evaluates the efficacy of capecitabine using data from a large, well-characterised population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated in two identically designed phase III studies. A total of 1207 patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomised to either oral capecitabine (1250 mg m(−2) twice daily, days 1−14 every 21 days; n=603) or intravenous (i.v.) bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV; Mayo Clinic regimen; n=604). Capecitabine demonstrated a statistically significant superior response rate compared with 5-FU/LV (26 vs 17%; P<0.0002). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that capecitabine consistently resulted in superior response rates (P<0.05), even in patient subgroups with poor prognostic indicators. The median time to response and duration of response were similar and time to progression (TTP) was equivalent in the two arms (hazard ratio (HR) 0.997, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.885–1.123, P=0.95; median 4.6 vs 4.7 months with capecitabine and 5-FU/LV, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified younger age, liver metastases, multiple metastases and poor Karnofsky Performance Status as independent prognostic indicators for poor TTP. Overall survival was equivalent in the two arms (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84–1.06, P=0.48; median 12.9 vs 12.8 months, respectively). Capecitabine results in superior response rate, equivalent TTP and overall survival, an improved safety profile and improved convenience compared with i.v. 5-FU/LV as first-line treatment for MCRC. For patients in whom fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is indicated, capecitabine should be strongly considered. Following encouraging results from phase I and II trials, randomised trials are evaluating capecitabine in combination with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and radiotherapy. Capecitabine is a suitable replacement for i.v. 5-FU as the backbone of colorectal cancer therapy.
format Text
id pubmed-2409640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24096402009-09-10 Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials Cutsem, E Van Hoff, P M Harper, P Bukowski, R M Cunningham, D Dufour, P Graeven, U Lokich, J Madajewicz, S Maroun, J A Marshall, J L Mitchell, E P Perez-Manga, G Rougier, P Schmiegel, W Schoelmerich, J Sobrero, A Schilsky, R L Br J Cancer Clincal This study evaluates the efficacy of capecitabine using data from a large, well-characterised population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated in two identically designed phase III studies. A total of 1207 patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomised to either oral capecitabine (1250 mg m(−2) twice daily, days 1−14 every 21 days; n=603) or intravenous (i.v.) bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV; Mayo Clinic regimen; n=604). Capecitabine demonstrated a statistically significant superior response rate compared with 5-FU/LV (26 vs 17%; P<0.0002). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that capecitabine consistently resulted in superior response rates (P<0.05), even in patient subgroups with poor prognostic indicators. The median time to response and duration of response were similar and time to progression (TTP) was equivalent in the two arms (hazard ratio (HR) 0.997, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.885–1.123, P=0.95; median 4.6 vs 4.7 months with capecitabine and 5-FU/LV, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified younger age, liver metastases, multiple metastases and poor Karnofsky Performance Status as independent prognostic indicators for poor TTP. Overall survival was equivalent in the two arms (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84–1.06, P=0.48; median 12.9 vs 12.8 months, respectively). Capecitabine results in superior response rate, equivalent TTP and overall survival, an improved safety profile and improved convenience compared with i.v. 5-FU/LV as first-line treatment for MCRC. For patients in whom fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is indicated, capecitabine should be strongly considered. Following encouraging results from phase I and II trials, randomised trials are evaluating capecitabine in combination with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and radiotherapy. Capecitabine is a suitable replacement for i.v. 5-FU as the backbone of colorectal cancer therapy. Nature Publishing Group 2004-03-22 2004-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2409640/ /pubmed/15026800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601676 Text en Copyright © 2004 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clincal
Cutsem, E Van
Hoff, P M
Harper, P
Bukowski, R M
Cunningham, D
Dufour, P
Graeven, U
Lokich, J
Madajewicz, S
Maroun, J A
Marshall, J L
Mitchell, E P
Perez-Manga, G
Rougier, P
Schmiegel, W
Schoelmerich, J
Sobrero, A
Schilsky, R L
Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials
title Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials
title_full Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials
title_fullStr Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials
title_full_unstemmed Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials
title_short Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials
title_sort oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase iii trials
topic Clincal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15026800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601676
work_keys_str_mv AT cutsemevan oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT hoffpm oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT harperp oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT bukowskirm oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT cunninghamd oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT dufourp oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT graevenu oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT lokichj oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT madajewiczs oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT marounja oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT marshalljl oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT mitchellep oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT perezmangag oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT rougierp oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT schmiegelw oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT schoelmerichj oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT sobreroa oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials
AT schilskyrl oralcapecitabinevsintravenous5fluorouracilandleucovorinintegratedefficacydataandnovelanalysesfromtwolargerandomisedphaseiiitrials