Cargando…

Survival results of a multicentre phase II study to evaluate D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Curative resection is the treatment of choice for potentially curable gastric cancer. Two major Western studies in the 1990s failed to show a benefit from D2 dissection. They showed extremely high postoperative mortality after D2 dissection, and were criticised for the potential inadequacy of the pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Degiuli, M, Sasako, M, Ponti, A, Calvo, F
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15150592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601761
_version_ 1782155850057515008
author Degiuli, M
Sasako, M
Ponti, A
Calvo, F
author_facet Degiuli, M
Sasako, M
Ponti, A
Calvo, F
author_sort Degiuli, M
collection PubMed
description Curative resection is the treatment of choice for potentially curable gastric cancer. Two major Western studies in the 1990s failed to show a benefit from D2 dissection. They showed extremely high postoperative mortality after D2 dissection, and were criticised for the potential inadequacy of the pretrial training in the new technique of D2 dissection, prior to the phase III studies being initiated. The inclusion of pancreatectomy and splenectomy in D2 dissection was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Following these results, we started a phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pancreas-preserving D2 dissection. The results of this trial regarding the safety of pancreas preserving D2 dissection were published in 1998. In this paper, we present the survival results of this phase II trial to confirm the rationale of carrying out a phase III study comparing D1 vs D2 dissection for curable gastric cancer. Italian patients with histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma were registered in the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group Multicenter trial. The study was carried out based on the General Rules of the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. A strict quality control system was achieved by a supervising surgeon of the reference centre who had stayed at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, to learn the standard D2 gastrectomy and the postoperative management. The standard procedure entailed removal of the first and second tier lymph nodes. During total gastrectomy, the pancreas was preserved according to the Maruyama technique. Complete follow-up was available to death or 5 years in 100% of patients and the median follow-up time was 4.38 years. Out of 297 consecutive patients registered, 191 patients were enrolled in the study between May 1994 and December 1996. The overall morbidity rate was 20.9%. The postoperative in-hospital mortality was 3.1%. The overall 5-year survival rate among all eligible patients was 55%. Survival was strictly related to stage, depth of wall invasion, lymph node involvement and type of gastrectomy (distal vs total). Our results suggest a survival benefit for pancreas-preserving D2 dissection in Italian patients with gastric cancer if performed in experienced centres. A phase III trial among exclusively experienced centres is urgently needed.
format Text
id pubmed-2409745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24097452009-09-10 Survival results of a multicentre phase II study to evaluate D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer Degiuli, M Sasako, M Ponti, A Calvo, F Br J Cancer Clinical Curative resection is the treatment of choice for potentially curable gastric cancer. Two major Western studies in the 1990s failed to show a benefit from D2 dissection. They showed extremely high postoperative mortality after D2 dissection, and were criticised for the potential inadequacy of the pretrial training in the new technique of D2 dissection, prior to the phase III studies being initiated. The inclusion of pancreatectomy and splenectomy in D2 dissection was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Following these results, we started a phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pancreas-preserving D2 dissection. The results of this trial regarding the safety of pancreas preserving D2 dissection were published in 1998. In this paper, we present the survival results of this phase II trial to confirm the rationale of carrying out a phase III study comparing D1 vs D2 dissection for curable gastric cancer. Italian patients with histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma were registered in the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group Multicenter trial. The study was carried out based on the General Rules of the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. A strict quality control system was achieved by a supervising surgeon of the reference centre who had stayed at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, to learn the standard D2 gastrectomy and the postoperative management. The standard procedure entailed removal of the first and second tier lymph nodes. During total gastrectomy, the pancreas was preserved according to the Maruyama technique. Complete follow-up was available to death or 5 years in 100% of patients and the median follow-up time was 4.38 years. Out of 297 consecutive patients registered, 191 patients were enrolled in the study between May 1994 and December 1996. The overall morbidity rate was 20.9%. The postoperative in-hospital mortality was 3.1%. The overall 5-year survival rate among all eligible patients was 55%. Survival was strictly related to stage, depth of wall invasion, lymph node involvement and type of gastrectomy (distal vs total). Our results suggest a survival benefit for pancreas-preserving D2 dissection in Italian patients with gastric cancer if performed in experienced centres. A phase III trial among exclusively experienced centres is urgently needed. Nature Publishing Group 2004-05-04 2004-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2409745/ /pubmed/15150592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601761 Text en Copyright © 2004 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical
Degiuli, M
Sasako, M
Ponti, A
Calvo, F
Survival results of a multicentre phase II study to evaluate D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title Survival results of a multicentre phase II study to evaluate D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title_full Survival results of a multicentre phase II study to evaluate D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title_fullStr Survival results of a multicentre phase II study to evaluate D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Survival results of a multicentre phase II study to evaluate D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title_short Survival results of a multicentre phase II study to evaluate D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer
title_sort survival results of a multicentre phase ii study to evaluate d2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15150592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601761
work_keys_str_mv AT degiulim survivalresultsofamulticentrephaseiistudytoevaluated2gastrectomyforgastriccancer
AT sasakom survivalresultsofamulticentrephaseiistudytoevaluated2gastrectomyforgastriccancer
AT pontia survivalresultsofamulticentrephaseiistudytoevaluated2gastrectomyforgastriccancer
AT calvof survivalresultsofamulticentrephaseiistudytoevaluated2gastrectomyforgastriccancer