Cargando…

Gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients

The aim of this study was to assess whether a combination of gemcitabine (GEM) with either paclitaxel (PTX) or vinorelbine (VNR) could be more effective than GEM or PTX alone in elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A total of 264 NSCLC patients aged >70 years wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Comella, P, Frasci, G, Carnicelli, P, Massidda, B, Buzzi, F, Filippelli, G, Maiorino, L, Guida, M, Panza, N, Mancarella, S, Cioffi, R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15266334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602011
_version_ 1782155875199221760
author Comella, P
Frasci, G
Carnicelli, P
Massidda, B
Buzzi, F
Filippelli, G
Maiorino, L
Guida, M
Panza, N
Mancarella, S
Cioffi, R
author_facet Comella, P
Frasci, G
Carnicelli, P
Massidda, B
Buzzi, F
Filippelli, G
Maiorino, L
Guida, M
Panza, N
Mancarella, S
Cioffi, R
author_sort Comella, P
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to assess whether a combination of gemcitabine (GEM) with either paclitaxel (PTX) or vinorelbine (VNR) could be more effective than GEM or PTX alone in elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A total of 264 NSCLC patients aged >70 years with ECOG performance status (PS)⩽2, or younger with PS=2, were randomly treated with: GEM 1200 mg m(−2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days; PTX 100 mg m(−2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days; GEM 1000 mg m(−2) plus PTX 80 mg m(−2) (GT) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days; GEM 1000 mg m(−2) plus VNR 25 mg m(−2) (GV) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. In all arms, an intra-patients dose escalation was applied over the first three courses, provided that no toxicity of WHO grade ⩾2 had previously occurred. At present time, 217 (82%) patients had died. The median (months) and 1-year survival probability were 5.1 and 29% for GEM, 6.4 and 25% for PTX, 9.2 and 44% for GT, and 9.7 and 32% for GV. Multivariate analysis showed that PS⩽1 (hazard ratio (HR)=0.67; 95% CI 0.51–0.90), and doublet treatments (HR=0.76; 95% CI 0.59–0.99) were significantly associated with longer survival. Doublets produced no more toxicity than single agents. GT should be considered a reference regimen for elderly NSCLC patients with PS⩽1.
format Text
id pubmed-2409832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24098322009-09-10 Gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients Comella, P Frasci, G Carnicelli, P Massidda, B Buzzi, F Filippelli, G Maiorino, L Guida, M Panza, N Mancarella, S Cioffi, R Br J Cancer Clinical The aim of this study was to assess whether a combination of gemcitabine (GEM) with either paclitaxel (PTX) or vinorelbine (VNR) could be more effective than GEM or PTX alone in elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A total of 264 NSCLC patients aged >70 years with ECOG performance status (PS)⩽2, or younger with PS=2, were randomly treated with: GEM 1200 mg m(−2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days; PTX 100 mg m(−2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days; GEM 1000 mg m(−2) plus PTX 80 mg m(−2) (GT) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days; GEM 1000 mg m(−2) plus VNR 25 mg m(−2) (GV) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. In all arms, an intra-patients dose escalation was applied over the first three courses, provided that no toxicity of WHO grade ⩾2 had previously occurred. At present time, 217 (82%) patients had died. The median (months) and 1-year survival probability were 5.1 and 29% for GEM, 6.4 and 25% for PTX, 9.2 and 44% for GT, and 9.7 and 32% for GV. Multivariate analysis showed that PS⩽1 (hazard ratio (HR)=0.67; 95% CI 0.51–0.90), and doublet treatments (HR=0.76; 95% CI 0.59–0.99) were significantly associated with longer survival. Doublets produced no more toxicity than single agents. GT should be considered a reference regimen for elderly NSCLC patients with PS⩽1. Nature Publishing Group 2004-08-02 2004-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2409832/ /pubmed/15266334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602011 Text en Copyright © 2004 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical
Comella, P
Frasci, G
Carnicelli, P
Massidda, B
Buzzi, F
Filippelli, G
Maiorino, L
Guida, M
Panza, N
Mancarella, S
Cioffi, R
Gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients
title Gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients
title_full Gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients
title_fullStr Gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients
title_short Gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients
title_sort gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15266334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602011
work_keys_str_mv AT comellap gemcitabinewitheitherpaclitaxelorvinorelbinevspaclitaxelorgemcitabinealoneforelderlyorunfitadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatients
AT frascig gemcitabinewitheitherpaclitaxelorvinorelbinevspaclitaxelorgemcitabinealoneforelderlyorunfitadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatients
AT carnicellip gemcitabinewitheitherpaclitaxelorvinorelbinevspaclitaxelorgemcitabinealoneforelderlyorunfitadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatients
AT massiddab gemcitabinewitheitherpaclitaxelorvinorelbinevspaclitaxelorgemcitabinealoneforelderlyorunfitadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatients
AT buzzif gemcitabinewitheitherpaclitaxelorvinorelbinevspaclitaxelorgemcitabinealoneforelderlyorunfitadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatients
AT filippellig gemcitabinewitheitherpaclitaxelorvinorelbinevspaclitaxelorgemcitabinealoneforelderlyorunfitadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatients
AT maiorinol gemcitabinewitheitherpaclitaxelorvinorelbinevspaclitaxelorgemcitabinealoneforelderlyorunfitadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatients
AT guidam gemcitabinewitheitherpaclitaxelorvinorelbinevspaclitaxelorgemcitabinealoneforelderlyorunfitadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatients
AT panzan gemcitabinewitheitherpaclitaxelorvinorelbinevspaclitaxelorgemcitabinealoneforelderlyorunfitadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatients
AT mancarellas gemcitabinewitheitherpaclitaxelorvinorelbinevspaclitaxelorgemcitabinealoneforelderlyorunfitadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatients
AT cioffir gemcitabinewitheitherpaclitaxelorvinorelbinevspaclitaxelorgemcitabinealoneforelderlyorunfitadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpatients