Cargando…
Irinotecan plus gemcitabine vs irinotecan for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with docetaxel and cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, phase II study
To compare irinotecan (CPT-11)+gemcitabine vs CPT-11 alone as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after docetaxel–cisplatinum-based therapy. A total of 147 evaluable, pretreated patients, with NSCLC, received either gemcitabine (1000 mg m(−...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15238986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602010 |
_version_ | 1782155875445637120 |
---|---|
author | Georgoulias, V Kouroussis, C Agelidou, A Boukovinas, I Palamidas, P Stavrinidis, E Polyzos, A Syrigos, K Veslemes, M Toubis, M Ardavanis, A Tselepatiotis, E Vlachonikolis, I |
author_facet | Georgoulias, V Kouroussis, C Agelidou, A Boukovinas, I Palamidas, P Stavrinidis, E Polyzos, A Syrigos, K Veslemes, M Toubis, M Ardavanis, A Tselepatiotis, E Vlachonikolis, I |
author_sort | Georgoulias, V |
collection | PubMed |
description | To compare irinotecan (CPT-11)+gemcitabine vs CPT-11 alone as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after docetaxel–cisplatinum-based therapy. A total of 147 evaluable, pretreated patients, with NSCLC, received either gemcitabine (1000 mg m(−2), days 1 and 8)+CPT-11 (300 mg m(−2), day 8) (Group A, n=76) or CPT-11 (300 mg m(−2), day 1) (Group B, n=71), every 3 weeks. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The objective response rate was 18.4% (95% CI: 9.71–27.14%) and 4.2% (95% CI: 0–8.90%) (P=0.009) for groups A and B, respectively. No significant differences between the two groups in terms of the median duration of response, time to tumour progression, overall survival and 1-year survival were observed. The CPT-11/gemcitabine regimen significantly improved the patients' quality of life (‘general mood today’ (P=0.014), ‘coughing’ (P=0.003) and ‘intensity of symptoms’ (P=0.034)) compared with CPT-11. More cycles had to be delayed (P=0.001) and required prophylactic growth factor support (P=0.001) in Group A than B. Three (3.9%) patients in Group A and eight (11.3%) in Group B developed febrile neutropenia (P=0.09); one patient died of sepsis in each group. Three additional (Group A, n=1; Group B, n=2) treatment-related deaths were observed. Grade 3–4 haematologic toxicity was comparable in the two groups except anaemia (P=0.03 in favour of CPT-11). Other nonhaematologic toxicities were mild and similar in the two groups. CPT-11+gemcitabine resulted in a higher response rate and better control of disease-related symptoms than CPT-11 alone, but without any improvement in the overall survival. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2409833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24098332009-09-10 Irinotecan plus gemcitabine vs irinotecan for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with docetaxel and cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, phase II study Georgoulias, V Kouroussis, C Agelidou, A Boukovinas, I Palamidas, P Stavrinidis, E Polyzos, A Syrigos, K Veslemes, M Toubis, M Ardavanis, A Tselepatiotis, E Vlachonikolis, I Br J Cancer Clinical To compare irinotecan (CPT-11)+gemcitabine vs CPT-11 alone as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after docetaxel–cisplatinum-based therapy. A total of 147 evaluable, pretreated patients, with NSCLC, received either gemcitabine (1000 mg m(−2), days 1 and 8)+CPT-11 (300 mg m(−2), day 8) (Group A, n=76) or CPT-11 (300 mg m(−2), day 1) (Group B, n=71), every 3 weeks. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The objective response rate was 18.4% (95% CI: 9.71–27.14%) and 4.2% (95% CI: 0–8.90%) (P=0.009) for groups A and B, respectively. No significant differences between the two groups in terms of the median duration of response, time to tumour progression, overall survival and 1-year survival were observed. The CPT-11/gemcitabine regimen significantly improved the patients' quality of life (‘general mood today’ (P=0.014), ‘coughing’ (P=0.003) and ‘intensity of symptoms’ (P=0.034)) compared with CPT-11. More cycles had to be delayed (P=0.001) and required prophylactic growth factor support (P=0.001) in Group A than B. Three (3.9%) patients in Group A and eight (11.3%) in Group B developed febrile neutropenia (P=0.09); one patient died of sepsis in each group. Three additional (Group A, n=1; Group B, n=2) treatment-related deaths were observed. Grade 3–4 haematologic toxicity was comparable in the two groups except anaemia (P=0.03 in favour of CPT-11). Other nonhaematologic toxicities were mild and similar in the two groups. CPT-11+gemcitabine resulted in a higher response rate and better control of disease-related symptoms than CPT-11 alone, but without any improvement in the overall survival. Nature Publishing Group 2004-08-02 2004-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2409833/ /pubmed/15238986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602010 Text en Copyright © 2004 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Georgoulias, V Kouroussis, C Agelidou, A Boukovinas, I Palamidas, P Stavrinidis, E Polyzos, A Syrigos, K Veslemes, M Toubis, M Ardavanis, A Tselepatiotis, E Vlachonikolis, I Irinotecan plus gemcitabine vs irinotecan for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with docetaxel and cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, phase II study |
title | Irinotecan plus gemcitabine vs irinotecan for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with docetaxel and cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, phase II study |
title_full | Irinotecan plus gemcitabine vs irinotecan for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with docetaxel and cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, phase II study |
title_fullStr | Irinotecan plus gemcitabine vs irinotecan for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with docetaxel and cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, phase II study |
title_full_unstemmed | Irinotecan plus gemcitabine vs irinotecan for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with docetaxel and cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, phase II study |
title_short | Irinotecan plus gemcitabine vs irinotecan for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with docetaxel and cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, phase II study |
title_sort | irinotecan plus gemcitabine vs irinotecan for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with docetaxel and cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, phase ii study |
topic | Clinical |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15238986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT georgouliasv irinotecanplusgemcitabinevsirinotecanforthesecondlinetreatmentofpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpretreatedwithdocetaxelandcisplatinamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudy AT kouroussisc irinotecanplusgemcitabinevsirinotecanforthesecondlinetreatmentofpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpretreatedwithdocetaxelandcisplatinamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudy AT agelidoua irinotecanplusgemcitabinevsirinotecanforthesecondlinetreatmentofpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpretreatedwithdocetaxelandcisplatinamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudy AT boukovinasi irinotecanplusgemcitabinevsirinotecanforthesecondlinetreatmentofpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpretreatedwithdocetaxelandcisplatinamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudy AT palamidasp irinotecanplusgemcitabinevsirinotecanforthesecondlinetreatmentofpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpretreatedwithdocetaxelandcisplatinamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudy AT stavrinidise irinotecanplusgemcitabinevsirinotecanforthesecondlinetreatmentofpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpretreatedwithdocetaxelandcisplatinamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudy AT polyzosa irinotecanplusgemcitabinevsirinotecanforthesecondlinetreatmentofpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpretreatedwithdocetaxelandcisplatinamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudy AT syrigosk irinotecanplusgemcitabinevsirinotecanforthesecondlinetreatmentofpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpretreatedwithdocetaxelandcisplatinamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudy AT veslemesm irinotecanplusgemcitabinevsirinotecanforthesecondlinetreatmentofpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpretreatedwithdocetaxelandcisplatinamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudy AT toubism irinotecanplusgemcitabinevsirinotecanforthesecondlinetreatmentofpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpretreatedwithdocetaxelandcisplatinamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudy AT ardavanisa irinotecanplusgemcitabinevsirinotecanforthesecondlinetreatmentofpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpretreatedwithdocetaxelandcisplatinamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudy AT tselepatiotise irinotecanplusgemcitabinevsirinotecanforthesecondlinetreatmentofpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpretreatedwithdocetaxelandcisplatinamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudy AT vlachonikolisi irinotecanplusgemcitabinevsirinotecanforthesecondlinetreatmentofpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerpretreatedwithdocetaxelandcisplatinamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudy |