Cargando…

Phase II multicentre randomised study of docetaxel plus epirubicin vs 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus epirubicin (ET) and of 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. A total of 142 patients (intent-to-treat (ITT)) with at least one measurable le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonneterre, J, Dieras, V, Tubiana-Hulin, M, Bougnoux, P, Bonneterre, M-E, Delozier, T, Mayer, F, Culine, S, Dohoulou, N, Bendahmane, B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15381937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602179
_version_ 1782155905773600768
author Bonneterre, J
Dieras, V
Tubiana-Hulin, M
Bougnoux, P
Bonneterre, M-E
Delozier, T
Mayer, F
Culine, S
Dohoulou, N
Bendahmane, B
author_facet Bonneterre, J
Dieras, V
Tubiana-Hulin, M
Bougnoux, P
Bonneterre, M-E
Delozier, T
Mayer, F
Culine, S
Dohoulou, N
Bendahmane, B
author_sort Bonneterre, J
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus epirubicin (ET) and of 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. A total of 142 patients (intent-to-treat (ITT)) with at least one measurable lesion were randomised to receive docetaxel 75 mg m(−2) plus epirubicin 75 mg m(−2) or 5-fluorouracil 500 mg m(−2) plus epirubicin 75 mg m(−2) and cyclophosphamide 500 mg m(−2) intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Prophylactic granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor was only permitted after the first cycle, if required. Per-protocol analysis (n=132) gave an overall response rate for ET of 63.1% (95% confidence interval (CI), 50–78%) and for FEC 34.3% (95% CI, 23–47%) after a median seven and six cycles, respectively. Intent-to-treat population (n=142) gave an overall response rate for ET of 59% (95% CI, 47–70%) and for FEC 32% (95% CI, 21–43%) after a median seven and six cycles, respectively. The median response duration for ET was 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.2–9.6 months) and for FEC 7.8 months (95% CI, 6.5–10.4 months). The median time to progression (ITT) for ET was 7.8 months (95% CI, 5.8–9.6 months) and for FEC 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.6–7.8 months). After a median follow-up of 23.8 months, median survival (ITT) for ET and FEC were 34 and 28 months, respectively. Nonhaematologic grade 3–4 toxicities were infrequent in both arms. Haematologic toxicity was more common with ET and febrile neutropenia was reported in 13 patients (18.6%) in the ET group. Two deaths in the ET group were possibly related to study treatment. In conclusion, both ET and FEC were associated with acceptable toxicity. ET is a highly active first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer.
format Text
id pubmed-2409942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24099422009-09-10 Phase II multicentre randomised study of docetaxel plus epirubicin vs 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer Bonneterre, J Dieras, V Tubiana-Hulin, M Bougnoux, P Bonneterre, M-E Delozier, T Mayer, F Culine, S Dohoulou, N Bendahmane, B Br J Cancer Clinical The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus epirubicin (ET) and of 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. A total of 142 patients (intent-to-treat (ITT)) with at least one measurable lesion were randomised to receive docetaxel 75 mg m(−2) plus epirubicin 75 mg m(−2) or 5-fluorouracil 500 mg m(−2) plus epirubicin 75 mg m(−2) and cyclophosphamide 500 mg m(−2) intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Prophylactic granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor was only permitted after the first cycle, if required. Per-protocol analysis (n=132) gave an overall response rate for ET of 63.1% (95% confidence interval (CI), 50–78%) and for FEC 34.3% (95% CI, 23–47%) after a median seven and six cycles, respectively. Intent-to-treat population (n=142) gave an overall response rate for ET of 59% (95% CI, 47–70%) and for FEC 32% (95% CI, 21–43%) after a median seven and six cycles, respectively. The median response duration for ET was 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.2–9.6 months) and for FEC 7.8 months (95% CI, 6.5–10.4 months). The median time to progression (ITT) for ET was 7.8 months (95% CI, 5.8–9.6 months) and for FEC 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.6–7.8 months). After a median follow-up of 23.8 months, median survival (ITT) for ET and FEC were 34 and 28 months, respectively. Nonhaematologic grade 3–4 toxicities were infrequent in both arms. Haematologic toxicity was more common with ET and febrile neutropenia was reported in 13 patients (18.6%) in the ET group. Two deaths in the ET group were possibly related to study treatment. In conclusion, both ET and FEC were associated with acceptable toxicity. ET is a highly active first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Nature Publishing Group 2004-10-18 2004-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2409942/ /pubmed/15381937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602179 Text en Copyright © 2004 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical
Bonneterre, J
Dieras, V
Tubiana-Hulin, M
Bougnoux, P
Bonneterre, M-E
Delozier, T
Mayer, F
Culine, S
Dohoulou, N
Bendahmane, B
Phase II multicentre randomised study of docetaxel plus epirubicin vs 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer
title Phase II multicentre randomised study of docetaxel plus epirubicin vs 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer
title_full Phase II multicentre randomised study of docetaxel plus epirubicin vs 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer
title_fullStr Phase II multicentre randomised study of docetaxel plus epirubicin vs 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Phase II multicentre randomised study of docetaxel plus epirubicin vs 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer
title_short Phase II multicentre randomised study of docetaxel plus epirubicin vs 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer
title_sort phase ii multicentre randomised study of docetaxel plus epirubicin vs 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2409942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15381937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602179
work_keys_str_mv AT bonneterrej phaseiimulticentrerandomisedstudyofdocetaxelplusepirubicinvs5fluorouracilplusepirubicinandcyclophosphamideinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT dierasv phaseiimulticentrerandomisedstudyofdocetaxelplusepirubicinvs5fluorouracilplusepirubicinandcyclophosphamideinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT tubianahulinm phaseiimulticentrerandomisedstudyofdocetaxelplusepirubicinvs5fluorouracilplusepirubicinandcyclophosphamideinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT bougnouxp phaseiimulticentrerandomisedstudyofdocetaxelplusepirubicinvs5fluorouracilplusepirubicinandcyclophosphamideinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT bonneterreme phaseiimulticentrerandomisedstudyofdocetaxelplusepirubicinvs5fluorouracilplusepirubicinandcyclophosphamideinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT deloziert phaseiimulticentrerandomisedstudyofdocetaxelplusepirubicinvs5fluorouracilplusepirubicinandcyclophosphamideinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT mayerf phaseiimulticentrerandomisedstudyofdocetaxelplusepirubicinvs5fluorouracilplusepirubicinandcyclophosphamideinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT culines phaseiimulticentrerandomisedstudyofdocetaxelplusepirubicinvs5fluorouracilplusepirubicinandcyclophosphamideinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT dohouloun phaseiimulticentrerandomisedstudyofdocetaxelplusepirubicinvs5fluorouracilplusepirubicinandcyclophosphamideinmetastaticbreastcancer
AT bendahmaneb phaseiimulticentrerandomisedstudyofdocetaxelplusepirubicinvs5fluorouracilplusepirubicinandcyclophosphamideinmetastaticbreastcancer