Cargando…
Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort
This multi-centre UK study assesses the impact of predictive testing for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes (BRCA1/2) in the clinical context. In the year following predictive testing, 261 adults (59 male) from nine UK genetics centres participated; 91 gene mutation carriers and 170 nonc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2410052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15505627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602207 |
_version_ | 1782155922585419776 |
---|---|
author | Watson, M Foster, C Eeles, R Eccles, D Ashley, S Davidson, R Mackay, J Morrison, P J Hopwood, P Evans, D G R |
author_facet | Watson, M Foster, C Eeles, R Eccles, D Ashley, S Davidson, R Mackay, J Morrison, P J Hopwood, P Evans, D G R |
author_sort | Watson, M |
collection | PubMed |
description | This multi-centre UK study assesses the impact of predictive testing for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes (BRCA1/2) in the clinical context. In the year following predictive testing, 261 adults (59 male) from nine UK genetics centres participated; 91 gene mutation carriers and 170 noncarriers. Self-report questionnaires were completed at baseline (pre-genetic testing) and 1, 4 and 12 months following the genetic test result. Men were assessed for general mental health (by general health questionnaire (GHQ)) and women for general mental health, cancer-related worry, intrusive and avoidant thoughts, perception of risk and risk management behaviour. Main comparisons were between female carriers and noncarriers on all measures and men and women for general mental health. Female noncarriers benefited psychologically, with significant reductions in cancer-related worry following testing (P<0.001). However, younger female carriers (<50 years) showed a rise in cancer-related worry 1 month post-testing (P<0.05). This returned to pre-testing baseline levels 12 months later, but worry remained significantly higher than noncarriers throughout (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in GHQ scores between males and females (both carriers and noncarriers) at any time point. Female carriers engaged in significantly more risk management strategies than noncarriers in the year following testing (e.g. mammograms; 92% carriers vs 30% noncarriers). In the 12 months post-testing, 28% carriers had bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and 31% oophorectomy. Oophorectomy was confined to older (mean 41 yrs) women who already had children. However, worry about cancer was not assuaged by surgery following genetic testing, and this requires further investigation. In all, 20% of female carriers reported insurance problems. The data show persistent worry in younger female gene carriers and confirm changes in risk management consistent with carrier status. Men were not adversely affected by genetic testing in terms of their general mental health. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2410052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24100522009-09-10 Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort Watson, M Foster, C Eeles, R Eccles, D Ashley, S Davidson, R Mackay, J Morrison, P J Hopwood, P Evans, D G R Br J Cancer Clinical This multi-centre UK study assesses the impact of predictive testing for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes (BRCA1/2) in the clinical context. In the year following predictive testing, 261 adults (59 male) from nine UK genetics centres participated; 91 gene mutation carriers and 170 noncarriers. Self-report questionnaires were completed at baseline (pre-genetic testing) and 1, 4 and 12 months following the genetic test result. Men were assessed for general mental health (by general health questionnaire (GHQ)) and women for general mental health, cancer-related worry, intrusive and avoidant thoughts, perception of risk and risk management behaviour. Main comparisons were between female carriers and noncarriers on all measures and men and women for general mental health. Female noncarriers benefited psychologically, with significant reductions in cancer-related worry following testing (P<0.001). However, younger female carriers (<50 years) showed a rise in cancer-related worry 1 month post-testing (P<0.05). This returned to pre-testing baseline levels 12 months later, but worry remained significantly higher than noncarriers throughout (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in GHQ scores between males and females (both carriers and noncarriers) at any time point. Female carriers engaged in significantly more risk management strategies than noncarriers in the year following testing (e.g. mammograms; 92% carriers vs 30% noncarriers). In the 12 months post-testing, 28% carriers had bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and 31% oophorectomy. Oophorectomy was confined to older (mean 41 yrs) women who already had children. However, worry about cancer was not assuaged by surgery following genetic testing, and this requires further investigation. In all, 20% of female carriers reported insurance problems. The data show persistent worry in younger female gene carriers and confirm changes in risk management consistent with carrier status. Men were not adversely affected by genetic testing in terms of their general mental health. Nature Publishing Group 2004-11-15 2004-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2410052/ /pubmed/15505627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602207 Text en Copyright © 2004 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Watson, M Foster, C Eeles, R Eccles, D Ashley, S Davidson, R Mackay, J Morrison, P J Hopwood, P Evans, D G R Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort |
title | Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort |
title_full | Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort |
title_fullStr | Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort |
title_short | Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort |
title_sort | psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (brca1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a uk multi-centre clinical cohort |
topic | Clinical |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2410052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15505627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602207 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watsonm psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort AT fosterc psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort AT eelesr psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort AT ecclesd psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort AT ashleys psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort AT davidsonr psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort AT mackayj psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort AT morrisonpj psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort AT hopwoodp psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort AT evansdgr psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort AT psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort |