Cargando…

Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort

This multi-centre UK study assesses the impact of predictive testing for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes (BRCA1/2) in the clinical context. In the year following predictive testing, 261 adults (59 male) from nine UK genetics centres participated; 91 gene mutation carriers and 170 nonc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watson, M, Foster, C, Eeles, R, Eccles, D, Ashley, S, Davidson, R, Mackay, J, Morrison, P J, Hopwood, P, Evans, D G R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2410052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15505627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602207
_version_ 1782155922585419776
author Watson, M
Foster, C
Eeles, R
Eccles, D
Ashley, S
Davidson, R
Mackay, J
Morrison, P J
Hopwood, P
Evans, D G R
author_facet Watson, M
Foster, C
Eeles, R
Eccles, D
Ashley, S
Davidson, R
Mackay, J
Morrison, P J
Hopwood, P
Evans, D G R
author_sort Watson, M
collection PubMed
description This multi-centre UK study assesses the impact of predictive testing for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes (BRCA1/2) in the clinical context. In the year following predictive testing, 261 adults (59 male) from nine UK genetics centres participated; 91 gene mutation carriers and 170 noncarriers. Self-report questionnaires were completed at baseline (pre-genetic testing) and 1, 4 and 12 months following the genetic test result. Men were assessed for general mental health (by general health questionnaire (GHQ)) and women for general mental health, cancer-related worry, intrusive and avoidant thoughts, perception of risk and risk management behaviour. Main comparisons were between female carriers and noncarriers on all measures and men and women for general mental health. Female noncarriers benefited psychologically, with significant reductions in cancer-related worry following testing (P<0.001). However, younger female carriers (<50 years) showed a rise in cancer-related worry 1 month post-testing (P<0.05). This returned to pre-testing baseline levels 12 months later, but worry remained significantly higher than noncarriers throughout (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in GHQ scores between males and females (both carriers and noncarriers) at any time point. Female carriers engaged in significantly more risk management strategies than noncarriers in the year following testing (e.g. mammograms; 92% carriers vs 30% noncarriers). In the 12 months post-testing, 28% carriers had bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and 31% oophorectomy. Oophorectomy was confined to older (mean 41 yrs) women who already had children. However, worry about cancer was not assuaged by surgery following genetic testing, and this requires further investigation. In all, 20% of female carriers reported insurance problems. The data show persistent worry in younger female gene carriers and confirm changes in risk management consistent with carrier status. Men were not adversely affected by genetic testing in terms of their general mental health.
format Text
id pubmed-2410052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24100522009-09-10 Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort Watson, M Foster, C Eeles, R Eccles, D Ashley, S Davidson, R Mackay, J Morrison, P J Hopwood, P Evans, D G R Br J Cancer Clinical This multi-centre UK study assesses the impact of predictive testing for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes (BRCA1/2) in the clinical context. In the year following predictive testing, 261 adults (59 male) from nine UK genetics centres participated; 91 gene mutation carriers and 170 noncarriers. Self-report questionnaires were completed at baseline (pre-genetic testing) and 1, 4 and 12 months following the genetic test result. Men were assessed for general mental health (by general health questionnaire (GHQ)) and women for general mental health, cancer-related worry, intrusive and avoidant thoughts, perception of risk and risk management behaviour. Main comparisons were between female carriers and noncarriers on all measures and men and women for general mental health. Female noncarriers benefited psychologically, with significant reductions in cancer-related worry following testing (P<0.001). However, younger female carriers (<50 years) showed a rise in cancer-related worry 1 month post-testing (P<0.05). This returned to pre-testing baseline levels 12 months later, but worry remained significantly higher than noncarriers throughout (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in GHQ scores between males and females (both carriers and noncarriers) at any time point. Female carriers engaged in significantly more risk management strategies than noncarriers in the year following testing (e.g. mammograms; 92% carriers vs 30% noncarriers). In the 12 months post-testing, 28% carriers had bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and 31% oophorectomy. Oophorectomy was confined to older (mean 41 yrs) women who already had children. However, worry about cancer was not assuaged by surgery following genetic testing, and this requires further investigation. In all, 20% of female carriers reported insurance problems. The data show persistent worry in younger female gene carriers and confirm changes in risk management consistent with carrier status. Men were not adversely affected by genetic testing in terms of their general mental health. Nature Publishing Group 2004-11-15 2004-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2410052/ /pubmed/15505627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602207 Text en Copyright © 2004 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical
Watson, M
Foster, C
Eeles, R
Eccles, D
Ashley, S
Davidson, R
Mackay, J
Morrison, P J
Hopwood, P
Evans, D G R
Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort
title Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort
title_full Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort
title_fullStr Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort
title_full_unstemmed Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort
title_short Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort
title_sort psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (brca1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a uk multi-centre clinical cohort
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2410052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15505627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602207
work_keys_str_mv AT watsonm psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort
AT fosterc psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort
AT eelesr psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort
AT ecclesd psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort
AT ashleys psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort
AT davidsonr psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort
AT mackayj psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort
AT morrisonpj psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort
AT hopwoodp psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort
AT evansdgr psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort
AT psychosocialimpactofbreastovarianbrca12cancerpredictivegenetictestinginaukmulticentreclinicalcohort